Telangana High Court

WP/25738/2007 of Mr.B.Motilal, Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer, on 24 December 2007

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN : PRESENT : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE: P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No. 25738 of 2007 Between: Mr. B.Motilal, S/o. B.Bhavanya Nayak. .....

TUESDAY THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN: PRESENT :

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE: P.S.NARAYANA

WRIT PETITION No. 25738 of 2007

Between:

Mr. B.Motilal, S/o. B.Bhavanya Nayak.

..... Petitioner

AND

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Bhodan, Nizamabad District.

Respondent

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavitfiled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in thenature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent in not passing the final order be subsequent to theorder in No. E1/1484/2006 dt. 18-4-06 as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Petitioner’s Fundamental rights guaranteed underArticle 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India in the interest of justice.

The Petition coming on for admission upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed herein and upon hearing thearguments of Sri Ravi Chander for Milind G.Gokhale, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Addl. G.P. for Civil Supplies for theRespondent.

The Court made the following ORDER:

“ Rule nisi. Call for records. List WPMP on 24-12-2007.

Sri Ravi Chander, the learned counsel representing the Writ Petitioner had placed strong reliance on thedecision of the Division Bench in Joint Collector, Kurnool Vs. A.Neelima (1996 (1) APLJ 285) and would maintainthat there is inordinate delay in completing the enquiry relating to the suspension pending enquiry. However,instructions are placed before this court by the learned AGP for Civil Supplies that on 30-10-2007 the authorizationin fact was cancelled. Sri Ravi Chander would submit this order was not communicated and only with a view to getover the inordinate delay, this order might have been thought of.

In the light of the facts and circumstances, let the RDO, Bodhan, Nizamabad, be present before this court on24-12-07. In the meanwhile no alternative arrangements to be made.”

SD/- P.SESHAGIRI RAO

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

// TRUE COPY //

for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

To

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Bodhan, Nizamabad District. (By Speed Post with a direction to be presentbefore this Court on 24-12-2007 at 10.30 A.M.)

2.Two CCs to Addl. G.P. for Civil Supplies, High Court of A.P.Hyd(OUT)

3.One CC to Sri Ravi Chander, Advocate(OPUC)

4.One spare copy.

SAH

HIGH COURT

PSNJ

NOTE: POST ON 24-12-2007

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

WP.NO. 25738 OF 2007

DIRECTION

DRAFTED BY: SAHAPPROVED BY: DRAFTED ON: 13-12-2007

HIGH COURT

PSNJDATED: 11-12-2007

NOTE: POST ON 24-12-2007

ORDERWP.NO. 25738 OF 2007

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead