Telangana High Court

WP/26738/2005 of A. Padmavathi, Vs The Station House Officer, on 26 December 2005

Cites 0, Cited by 0

MRS. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K .C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 26738 OF 2005 Dated 26-12-2005 Between : A . Padmavathi, wife of A . Bhaskar. PETITIONER. AND : 1. The Station House Officer, Gajulamandyam Police Station, Chittoor District and another. RESPONDENTS ORDER

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI

&

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K .C. BHANU

WRIT PETITION NO : 26738 OF 2005

Between :

Dated 26-12-2005

A. Padmavathi, wife of A. Bhaskar.AND :

PETITIONER.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The Station House Officer, Gajulamandyam Police Station, Chittoor District andanother.

RESPONDENTS

ORDER : (Per the Honourable Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari)

This is a taken up writ petition on the telegram dated 12-12-2005 seeking a directionto the respondents to produce the husband of the petitioner viz., A. Bhaskar ofVikratmala village, before this Court, who was illegally detained by Anjaneyulu, theSub-Inspector of Police, Gajulamandyam Police Station, Chitoor District and set himat liberty forthwith.

The 1st respondent has filed the counter denying the allegations in the Telegram. Itis contended in the counter that on the complaint given by the Mandal RevenueOfficer, Renigunta, a case in Cr. No : 53 of 2005 for the offence under section 430I.P.C. was registered and during the course of investigation, the alleged detenu andthe other accused surrendered before the III Additional J.F.C. Magistrate, Tirupathiand they were released on bail.

It is submitted across the Bar by the learned Advocate General that in view ofregistering the F.I.R. in Crime No: 53 of 2005 on the complaint given by the MandalRevenue Officer, Renigunta, the question of illegal detention does not arise.

In view of the submission made by the learned Advocate General and in viewof the averments made in the counter to the effect that on the complaint given bytheMandal Revenue Officer, a case was registered and the alleged detenu and otheraccused surrendered before the III Additional J.F.C. Magistrate, Tirupathi and theywere released on bail, We are of the view that no further orders are necessary in thiswrit petition.

In the result, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

_____________________

Justice T.MEENA KUMARI

_____________________

Date : 26-12-2005.

Dvs/Gurc

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI

&

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K .C. BHANU

WRIT PETITION NO : 26738 OF 2005

(Order delivered by the Honourable Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari)

Dated 26-12-2005

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead