Telangana High Court
WP/37379/2013 of M/s.K.J.Quarries Private Limited, Vs The Government of A.P. on 30 December 2013
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN Present HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.37379 of 2013 Between: M/s. K.J. Quarries Private Limited .. Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN
PresentHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.37379 of 2013
Between:
M/s. K.J. Quarries Private Limited
.. Petitioner
And The Government of Andhra Pradesh,Rep. by Principal Secretary,Home Affairs, Secretariat,Hyderabad & 4 others
.. Respondents
This Court made the following :
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner company submits that though mining lease wasentirely granted to the petitioner company, some local people are interfering with the miningoperations and also intimidating the employees as well as the owners of the petitionercompany. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner company filed a complaint to theSuperintendent of Police, Guntur Rural Mandal, Guntur (2[nd] respondent), on 16.11.2013and so far, no action is taken on its complaint. The petitioner company seeks disposal ofthe writ petition directing the second respondent to consider its representation and takeappropriate action as warranted by law.
2. Learned Government Pleader agrees for disposal of the writ petition as per theabove request of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, without expressing any opinion onmerits, directing the second respondent to consider and take appropriate decision, aswarranted by law, on the representation submitted to him on 16.11.2013 within a period ofthree (3) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. There shall be no order as tocosts. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed.
_____________________
JUSTICEP.NAVEEN RAO
Date: 30[th] December, 2013
KL
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
KL
Date: 30[th] December, 2013