Telangana High Court
WP/37148/2021 of Dr. K. Ravindranath Vs Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited on 31 December 2021
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 37148 OF 2021 Between: AND 1 Dr. K. Ravindranath, S/o K. Chandrasekhara Rao, aged about 69
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIUBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 37148 OF 2021
Between:
Dr. K. Ravindranath, S/o K. Chandrasekhara Rao, aged about 69 years, Occ:Doctor, Rl/o 2-1 -390 I 1 1, Nallakunta, Hyderabad.Doctor, Rl/o 2-1 -390 I 1 1, Nallakunta, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
1Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited, VidyuthSoudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad Rep. by its Chaiiman-cum-Managing[ Director.Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad Rep. by its Chaiiman-cum-Managing[ Director.
2The Superintending Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power DistributionCorporation Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad.Corporation Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad.
aJThe Divisional Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power DistributionCorporation Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Kukatplly, Hyderabad.JThe Divisional Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power DistributionCorporation Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Kukatplly, Hyderabad.
4The Asst. Divisional Engineer, Telangana State Southern power DistributionCorporation Limited, Ayyappa Society, Madhapur, Hyderabad.Corporation Limited, Ayyappa Society, Madhapur, Hyderabad.
5Greater Hydera.bad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad Circle, Tank Bund, Rep.by its Commissioner.by its Commissioner.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 oI the constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleasedto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of[,4andamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not receiving the applicationform and not releasing the power supply to the petitioner House Bearing plot No.176in Sy.No.SP 6P 7P, admeasuring 620 sq yards, Situated at Guttala BegumpetVillage, serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as illegal, null, void, arbitraryand consequently direct the respondents to release the power supply without beinginfluenced by the instructions of the sth respondent.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased ro directthe Respondents 1 to 4 to receive the apprication form and rerease the power suppryto the petitioner House Bearing prot No.176 in sy.No.5p 6p 7p, admeasuring 620 sqyards, Situated at Guttara Begumpet viilage, seriringampaily Mandar, Ranga ReddyDistrict.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B. MANOJ KUMAR
Counsel for the Resg ondent Nos. 1 to 4: SRI R. VINOD REDDY,S,3 FOR TSSPDCL
Counsel for the Resl ondent Nos. 5: SRI SAMPATH PRABHAKAR REDDY,SC FORGHMC
The Court made the [' ]rllowing: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.37148 of 2O2l
ORDDR;
This Writ Petition is filed aggrieved by the inaction of therespondents in receiving the application and releasing thepower supply to the petitioner,s house constructed in plotNo. 176 in Sy.No.SP, 6P and 7p admeasuring 620 sq. yardssituated at Guttala Begumpet Village, SerilingampallyMandal, Ranga Reddy District.
2. When the matter is taken up, it is submitted by thelearned counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised in thepresent Writ Petition is squarely covered by the orders passedby this Court in Wp.No.264Ot of 2O2t dt.25.10.202 I andWP.No.2 1 100 of 2019 dt.25.09.2Or9.
3. Sri R. Vinod Reddy, learned Standing Counsel forTelangana State Power Distribution Company Limitedappearing for respondents I to 4 and Sri Sampath prabhakarReddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater HyderabadMunicipal Corporation, appearing for respondent No.5, do notdispute the aforesaid submission.
4, In view of the above, and for reasons alike in the saidorder, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing therespondents to receive the application of the petitioner andrelease service connection to the petitioner within a period offour (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order,and the same shall be subject to further direction that mav be i \
issued by he State of Telangana or the Ape x C ourt in tl.relitigation r rending before it arising out of the orderdt.l2.O9.2C 12 in Writ Petition No.20407 of 2C0B and batchNo costs.litigation r rending before it arising out of the orderdt.l2.O9.2C 12 in Writ Petition No.20407 of 2C0B and batchNo costs.
5Conse luently, miscellaneous petitrons pr:nding, if anr,,sha1l stand :losed.
SD/. K, AMMAJIASSIST,\NT REGISTRAR
tt-
,TRUE COPY//
SE,CTION OFFICER
To,
1. The Chairman-c rm-Managing Director, Telangana State Scuthern PowerDistribution Corl cration Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda,'lyderabad.Distribution Corl cration Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda,'lyderabad.
2. The Superintenc ng Engineer, Telangana State Southern Powei' DistributionCorporation Lim ed, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad.Corporation Lim ed, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad.
3. The Divisional E rgineer, Telangana State Southern Power DistributionCorporation Limi ed, Vidyuth Soudha, Kukatplly, HyderabadCorporation Limi ed, Vidyuth Soudha, Kukatplly, Hyderabad
4. The Asst. Divisic tal Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power DistributionCorporation Limi ed, Ayyappa Society, Madhapur, Hyderabad.Corporation Limi ed, Ayyappa Society, Madhapur, Hyderabad.
5. The Commissior rr, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, HyderabadCircle, Tank Bun l.Circle, Tank Bun l.
6. One CC to SRl. t [I ]MANOJ KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC]
7. One CC to SRI F VINOD REDDY, SC FOR TSSPDCL IOPLTC]
8. One CC to SRI S cMPATH PRABHAKAR REDDY, SC [FOR ][3Hl/C ][OPUC]
9. Two CD Copies.
10.One spare copy.
( Along with the order c( py dated 25.1O.2021 in W.P.No. 26401 of [i1021 ][and dated]25.09.2019 inW.P.No. 1'1 100 of 2019)
25.09.2019 1NPJt V\
HIGH COURT
TVKJ
DATED:311121 [,-021]
ORDERWP.No.37148 o12021
HE [S ][)41]+ita0 6 JAI\, [20:12]t:,:. ,!'/
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT [PETITION]
WITHOUT COS"S./o*s
TTIE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
WRIT PETITION No.264Ol OF 2O2l
This Writ Petition is filed for the following relief:
"... to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction moreparticularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directingthe respondents to act in accordance with law and to provideservice connections along with electrical metres to the buildingconstructed on Plot bearing No.879, admeasuring 333 Sq.Yards in Sy. No.1 1ll4 to l1l18 Part of Sy. No.l I situated in SriSwamy Ayyappa Cooperative Housing Society Limited,Khanamet village, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R. District,without being influenced by the instructions of the 5'r'respondent. . ..."
When the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learnedCounsel for the petitioner that the issue raised in the present WritPetition is squarely covered by the order dated25.09.2019 passed bythis Court in W.P. No.21 I 00 of 201 9.Counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised in the present WritPetition is squarely covered by the order dated25.09.2019 passed bythis Court in W.P. No.21 I 00 of 201 9.
Learned Government Pleader appearing for Energy/respondentNo.1, Sri R. Vinod Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TelanganaState Power Distribution Company Limited appearing for respondents2 to 4 and, Sri Sampath Prabhakar Reddy, learned Standing Counselfor Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, appearing forState Power Distribution Company Limited appearing for respondents2 to 4 and, Sri Sampath Prabhakar Reddy, learned Standing Counselfor Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, appearing forrespondent No.5, do not dispute the aforesaid submission.
In view ofthe above, for the reasons alike in the said order, thisWril Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to releaseindividual service connection to the petitioner within a period of four(4) weeks lrom the date of receipt of a copy of this order, and the same shall be subject to [further ][direction ][that ][may ][be ][issued ][by ][the]State of Telan Iana [or ][the ][Apex ][Court ][in ][the ][litigation ][pending before]it arising out c'f the order [dated ][12.09.2012 ][in ][Writ ][Petition ][No'20407]of 2008 and ba tch. [No ][costs.]
Miscellt oeous [petitions pending ][if ][any, ][shall ][stand closed']
Date:25.10.2{ 21.MRIiR
(T. VINoD KUMAR, [J)]
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDYWRIT PETITION No.211oo OF 2019
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed aggrieved by action ofrespondents1n not receiving the application and notrespondents1n not receiving the application and notreleasing the power supply to the petitioner's house atpremises bearing Plot No.350, admeasuring 417 squa.reyards in Sy.No.lIl14 to 11118 situated at KhanametVillage, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits thatin similar circumstances, this Court disposed ofWP.No.22849 of 2018, dated 05-07-2O18.in similar circumstances, this Court disposed ofWP.No.22849 of 2018, dated 05-07-2O18.
Heard Sri R.Vinod Reddy, learned Standing Counselfor respondents 2 to 5 and Sri Sampath PrabhakarReddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.6.Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.6.
In view of the satne, for the reasons alike in thesaid order, the writ petition is disposed of directing therespondents to receive the application of the petitioner forelectric power supply connection by complying all thenorms asrequired by the respondent-Company.As and when such application is made, the respondent-Company is directed to provide individual serviceconnection to the petitioner within a period of four weeksfrom the date of submission of such application and provision o[ such [power ][supply ]"snnssfion [shaIl ][be]to [jurther ][direction ][that ][may be ][issued ][by ][the]subject State of Tekmgana [or the ][Supreme ][Court ][in ][the ][litigation]b:fore [it ][arising ][out of the ][judgment]pending dated 12-0tt-2O12 [in ][WP'No'2O4O7 ][of ][2008 ][and ][batch']Pending [mj ][scellaneous ][applications ][if ][any shall ][stand]closed.
25-O9-2019Nv1
A.RAJASHEKER [REDDY'J]