Telangana High Court
CRP/1365/2006 of Shagam Jagan Mohan Reddy, Vs Shagam Siva Sagara Kumari, on 22 December 2006
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND SIX : PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE: R. SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 1365 of 2006 (Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to revise the order of the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND SIX
: PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE: R. SUBHASH REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 1365 of 2006
(Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to revise theorder of the Court of the Principal District Judge at Khammam made inIA.No. 2616 of 2005 in A.S. No. 68 of 2005 dated 05-12-2005)
Between:
Shagam Jagan Mohan Reddy, S/o. Lakshma Reddy.
Petitioner
AND
1. Shagam Siva Sagara Kumari, W/o. Jagan Mohan Reddy, R/o.Sathupally Village and Mandal, Khammam District.Sathupally Village and Mandal, Khammam District.
2. Shagam Girish Reddy, S/o. Jagan Mohan Reddy, R/o. SathupalliVillage and Mandal, Khammam District, being minor, rep. by his nextfriend and mother ie., 1[st] respondent.Village and Mandal, Khammam District, being minor, rep. by his nextfriend and mother ie., 1[st] respondent.
Respondents
The Petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the petition andgrounds filed herein and the order of the High Court dated. 10-04-2006 madeherein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri J.U.M.V.Prasad, Advocate forthe Petitioner and of Sri Kowturu Vinaya Kumar Advocate on behalf of theRespondents.
The Court made the following ORDER:
“ This Court by order dated. 10-04-2006 granted interim ordersubject to condition of petitioner depositing half of the arrears ofmaintenance granted by the trial court and also continuing to pay a sumof Rs. 3000/- towards maintenance of first and second respondents. It is submitted by the learned counsel for parties that thoughsuch a condition is imposed in the order dated. 10-4-2006, no amount isdeposited as ordered by this court towards the arrears of maintenance.
In that view of the matter I do not find any valid ground tocontinue the interim order dated. 10-4-2004 and the same is vacated. It isopen for the first appellate court to dispose of the appeal. Post after 3 weeks.”
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1. The Principal District Judge at Khammam.
2. Shagam Siva Sagara Kumari, W/o. Jagan Mohan Reddy, R/o.Sathupally Village and Mandal, Khammam District. (for herself and onbehalf of Shagam Girish Reddy, being minor)Sathupally Village and Mandal, Khammam District. (for herself and onbehalf of Shagam Girish Reddy, being minor)
3. One CC to Sri J.U.M.V.Prasad, Advocate (OPUC)4. One spare copy.
SAH
HIGH COURT
RSRJ
DATED: 10-11-2006
NOTE: POST AFTER 3 WEEKS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
CRP.NO. 1365 OF 2006
DRAFTED BY: SAHAPPROVED BY: DRAFTED ON: 14-11-2006
HIGH COURT
RSRJ
DATED: 10-11-2006
ORDER
CRP.NO. 1365 OF 2006