Telangana High Court

WP/25559/2009 of BHIMA AND BROTHERS JEWELERS Vs The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation on 31 December 2009

COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 25559 of 2009 Between: BHIMA & BROTHERS JEWELERS, Beside Punjab National

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE

:PRESENT:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY

WRIT PETITION NO : 25559 of 2009

Between:

BHIMA & BROTHERS JEWELERS, Beside Punjab National Bank, Road No. 1, Housing Board Colony, Kukatpally, Rep.by its Partner, Mr N.Harish S/o Late Natarajan, aged 39 Years R/o Flat No 302,B Block, Fore Front Royal, Indian Airlines Colony, Begumpet, Hyderabad

..... Petitioner

AND

1 The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep.by its Special Officer &

Commissioner, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad

2 The Additional Commissioner, Advertisement, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad 3 U.S.M Business Systems Private Ltd 1-8-319/2, Patigadda Road, behind Ford Showroom, Secunderabad

.....Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstancesstated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order ordirection more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of therespondents in issuing the notices on 07-10-2009 vide proceedings in Serial Nos. 84539 foradvertisement fee for the Year 2009-2010 under Section 421 R/w section 622 of theMunicipal Corporation Act 1955 treating the name of Board/board frames fixed by thepetitioner on the parapet wall of its business place and consequently demanding the fee forthe same is illegal,arbitrary capricious and violation of the principles of natural justice.

Page 1 of 2

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed insupport there of and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P.SRIHARI, Advocate for thePetitioner and Smt. Kalpana Ekbote, SC for GHMC for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, theCourt made the following:

ORDER:

In the meanwhile, there shall be interim stay for a period of two weeks.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

// TRUE COPY //

for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

To

1 The Special Officer & Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad 2 The Additional Commissioner, Advertisement, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad 3 U.S.M Business Systems Private Ltd 1-8-319/2, Patigadda Road, behind Ford Showroom, Secunderabad(RR 1 to 3 by RPAD)

4. One CC to Sri P.SRIHARI, Advocate (OPUC)

5. One spare copy.

HIGH COURT

LNRJ

DT. 25.11.2009

POST ON 30.11.2009 IN THE MOTION LIST.

ORDER

WP NO. 25559/2009

INTERIM STAY.

Drafted by JUDt. 27.11.2009.

HIGH COURT

DT. 25.11.2009

POST ON 30.11.2009 IN THE MOTION LIST.

ORDER

WP NO. 25559/2009

INTERIM STAY.

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead