Telangana High Court
WP/28095/2007 of Adabala Satyanarayana Murthy S/o Rama Murthy Vs Government of A.P., Irrigation and Drainage Department, on 31 December 2007
SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.28095 OF 2007 Date: 31-12-2007 Between: Adabala Satyanarayana Murthy … Petitioner And 1. The Government of A.P. Irrigation and Drainage Department, rep.by its Executive Engineer, Amalapuram. and others … Respondents THE
WRIT PETITION NO.28095 OF 2007
Date:31-12-2007
Between:
Adabala Satyanarayana Murthy … Petitioner
And
1. The Government of A.P.
Irrigation and Drainage Department,
rep.by its Executive Engineer,
Amalapuram.
and others … Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION NO.28095 OF 2007
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
Heard the counsel for the petitioner, the learned A.G.P. for Irrigation andthe learned A.G.P. for R & B.
2. The instructions are placed before this court. It is stated by the learnedA.G.P. for R&B appearing for respondents 2 and 3 that respondents 2 and 3are not touching the subject matter of the writ petition. The same is herebyrecorded. The brief notes placed before this court is also hereby recorded.
3. The writ petition is filed praying for a Writ of Mandamus, declaring theaction of the respondents in taking steps to dispossess the petitioner from theproperty in an extent of 1.09 cents in R.S.No.385/1 of Gudapalli village ofMalkipuram Mandal, East Godavari District and meddling with the samewithout recourse to law relating to the construction of bridge over thedrainage called as “Shankaraguptam Drainage” of Malkipuram Mandal, EastGodavari District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Fundamental Rightsguaranteed under the Constitution of India and consequently directing therespondents not to interfere with the possession of the said property of thepetitioners in any manner and pass such other further reliefs.
4. Recording the statement made before this court that respondents arenot touching the subject property at all and also the brief notes, the writpetition is disposed of. No order as to costs. It is needless to say that in the event of the respondents claiming interest over the subject property, therespondents to follow due process of law.
31[st] December, 2007.
_________________P.S.NARAYANA,J
PNV
WRIT PETITION NO.28095OF 2007
Date: 31-12-2007