Telangana High Court
WP/15028/2014 of Tulasinagar Residents Welfare Association, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh- on 31 December 2021
THE SIr"il o i 615,;'j l,lfjif,flf Ar HvDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIR ,wo r,,o jdllsTil myEflffscErv8 E R PRESENT THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER wRtTPETfTlON No: 150 280F 2014 Between: Tulasinagar Residents Wr *iq*iit*{[i:6_ifu i;{*i}fl $,$[i$nd,":ry#i{?#i}Li* ...PETITIONER 1. The
HIGH COURT FOR THE SI
THE SISIr"il o i 615,;'j Ar HvDERABADl,lfjif,flf FRIDAY, THE THIR
THIR,wo r,,o jdllsTil myEflffscErv8
E R
PRESENT
THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
wRtTPETfTlON No: 150 280F 2014
Between:
Tulasinagar Residents Wr*iq*iit*{[i:6_ifu i;{*i}fl $,$[i$nd,":ry#i{?#i}Li*
...PETITIONER
AND
1. The Government of Anrnorini-ri,itlii'i:'d;;#l11',1iJ3?,r",ii'a.Rep [bv its ][Principal ][secretary' ]Municiparnorini-ri,itlii'i:'d;;#l11',1iJ3?,r",ii'a.Rep [bv its ][Principal ][secretary' ]Municipar
2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District
3. The Greater Hvderabad Commissioner, CtilttC, HyOerab;; .of .Municipal Corporation, [-''-' ][vvrvvrqrr]Rep. by its A/unicipalCommissioner, CtilttC, HyOerab;; .of .Municipal Corporation, [-''-' ][vvrvvrqrr]Rep. by its A/unicipal4' smt A.Jhansi. w/o sri A.phanindra, prot No.50, H.No.2-23-s22tB, Turasi 'Nagar,HMT Hiils, Kukatpaily, uvoeraOJJ_sbo olb' ['" ][""' ][' ][' ]HMT Hiils, Kukatpaily, uvoeraOJJ_sbo olb' ['" ][""' ][' ][' ]
5M/s. lntus Towers Ltd., Rep.byits^,Managing Direclor. Aravali Crescent,l,Nelson Crescent Road, VasavntKunJ, Phase ll, New Delhi 110 070.Nelson Crescent Road, VasavntKunJ, Phase ll, New Delhi 110 070.
,,.RESPONDENTS
Page 1 of 3
Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be preasedto issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of lvandamusto issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of lvandamusdeclaring the action of the Respondents No.2 & 3 in granting permission to the 5thRespondent for erection of Roof rop Tower(RTT) on the buirding of 4th Respondentin the residential area without following objections from the public, and the petitioner,there by causing damage to the hearth of the pubric residing, which is arbitrary, badand illegal and violation of Article-14 and Article-21 of the constitution of lndia,in the residential area without following objections from the public, and the petitioner,there by causing damage to the hearth of the pubric residing, which is arbitrary, badand illegal and violation of Article-14 and Article-21 of the constitution of lndia,consequently direct the Respondents No's 2 & 3 not to allow the sth Respondent forerection of Roof rop Tower(RTT) on the building of 4th Respondent situated at plotNo.50, H.No.2-23-52218, Tulasi Nagar, HIVT Hiils, Kukatpaily, Hyderabad-500072 inthe interest of justiceNo.50, H.No.2-23-52218, Tulasi Nagar, HIVT Hiils, Kukatpaily, Hyderabad-500072 inthe interest of justice WPMP.[NO:1][ 8623 OF][ 2014]
petition under section 151 [cpc ][praying ][that in the ][circumstances ][stated ][in]the affidavit [filed in ][support of ][the ][petition' ][the ][High Court may ][be ][pleased ][to ][Direct]theRespondentsNo's2&3nottoallowtheSthRespondentforerectionofRoofTopTowe(RTT)onthebuildingof4thRespondentsituatedatPlotNo.50,H.No.2-23-S22lE,TulasiNagar'HMTHi|ls'Kukatpally,Hyderabad-soo0T2intheinterestofjustice Counsel for the Petitioner: [SRI ][S. M. ][SUBHAN]
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: [GP ][FOR ][MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND]URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent N6.3: SR! SAMPATH PRABHAKAR REDDY,S.C. FOR GHMC
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5: Mr. MOHD ISLAMUDDIN ANSARI
The Couft made the following: ORDER
ORDER
Page 2 of 3
THE HON,BLE DT, JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
PF
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that thesubject matter oF this Writ Petition has become infructuous.
2Recording the said submission, the Writ petition is dismissedas infructuous.as infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ petitionshall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/-K.SAILESHIASSISTANT REGISTRAPlrr_,,SECTION OFFICER
/irRUE COPY// t
To,
1. One CC to SRI S. tV. SUBHAN, Advocate [OPUC]2. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration and Urban [Development, ][High Court]for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]2. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration and Urban [Development, ][High Court]for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]3. Two CCs to GP for [Revenue, ][High Court ][for ][the ][State ][of ][Telangana ][at]Hyderabad. [OUT]Hyderabad. [OUT]4. One CC to Sri Sampath Prabhakar [Reddy, S.C. ][for ][GHlt4C ][OPUC]5. One CC to [tr/lr. ]MOHD [ISLAI\4UDDIN ][ANSARI, Advocate ]IOPUC]6. Two CD Copies.5. One CC to [tr/lr. ]MOHD [ISLAI\4UDDIN ][ANSARI, Advocate ]IOPUC]6. Two CD Copies.
7. One Spare Copy.*r{
HIGH [COURT]
i
DATED:31 [11'212021]
ORDER
WP.No.15028 of [2014]
oF ['l L].:9/s'oIu,Cr'uu)"\")'1.lratrl +
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION [AS ][INFRUCTUOUS]WITHOUT COSTS
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…