Telangana High Court
WP/15726/2014 of M/s GMR Vemagiri Power Generation Limited Vs Electricity Regulatory Commission for for State of on 30 December 2014
C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.15726 of 2014 Date : 30-12-2014 Between : M/s. GMR Vemagiri Power Generation Ltd., Bangalore .. Petitioners And Electricity Regulatory Commission for The State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Secretary, Hyderabad and others ..
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY
W.P.No.15726 of 2014
Date : 30-12-2014
Between :
M/s. GMR Vemagiri Power Generation Ltd., Bangalore ..
Petitioners
And
Electricity Regulatory Commission for
The State of Telangana and the State of
Andhra Pradesh, represented by its
Secretary, Hyderabad and others ..
Respondents
Counsel for petitioner : Ms. Avani Reddy for Mr. AvinashDesai Counsel for respondent No.1 : Mr. Srinivasa Rao PutluriCounsel for respondent Nos.2, 3, & 4 : None appearedCounsel for respondent No.5 : Mr. P. Anand SeshuCounsel for respondent Nos.5 & 6 : Mr. O. Manohar Reddy The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantiverelief :
“ … to issue an appropriate writ, order ordirection, more particularly one in the nature of writof mandamus directing the 1[st]respondentcommission to expeditiously take up forconsideration and dispose of O.P. No.72 of 2012pending on the file of 1[st] respondent within a timeframe deemed reasonable …”
At the hearing, Ms. Avani Reddy, learned counsel forthe petitioner submitted that in view of the new development,namely, constitution of separate Regulatory Commission forthe State of Telangana, the petitioner is proposing to file acomprehensive Writ Petition.
In view of the same, the Writ Petition is closed, withliberty to the petitioner to file such a Writ Petition.
As a sequel to the disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMPNo.19492 of 2014 is disposed of as infructuous.
Date : 30-12-2014
________________________
Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy
AM