Telangana High Court
WP/20415/2004 of P. Krishna , Vs The Commissioner of Civil Supplies, on 30 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 20415 of 2004 Between: P. Krishna , S/o Papaiah, R/o H.No. 1-9-135, Ramnagar,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO : 20415 of 2004
Between:
P. Krishna , S/o Papaiah,
R/o H.No. 1-9-135, Ramnagar, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 The Commissioner of Civil Supplies, A.P. Somajiguda, Hyderabad.
2 The Chief Rationing Officer, Hyderabad, near Anand Talkies, Secunderabad.
3 District Supply Officer, Hyderabad ( city), near Anand Talkies, Secunderabad.
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue writ or direction preferably writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of therespondents in notifying the vacancies of Fair Price Shop Nos. 628 and 644 as perthe proceedings of the 1st respondent issued in revision No. N1/555/2003 dt. 7-3-2003 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice andconsequently direct the respondents to notify the above vacancies and commencethe selection process without any further delay and also consider the case of thepetitioner for appointment on regular basis as a dealer in the light of theobservations made in the above proceedings.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.KOWTURU VINAYA KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES
The Court, at the stage of admission, made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents are not notifying the vacancyof fair price shop Nos.628 and 644 of Secunderabad. Reference is made to variousproceedings initiated by the petitioner.
After the writ petition is filed, the respondents have issued a notificationinviting applications for filling the vacancies. In that view of the matter, the grievanceof the petitioner stands redressed. Petitioner states that he is now over aged by twomonths and the disqualification incurred by him is on account of inaction on the partof the respondents.
From a perusal of the order passed by the appellate authority, it is evident that thecase of the petitioner was directed to be considered.
In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing that, in case, thepetitioner submits his application, the respondents shall consider the same withoutinsisting on the qualifications as to age. There shall be no order as to costs ______________________
L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J
Dated : 30[th] December, 2004
TS
To
1 The Commissioner of Civil Supplies, A.P. Somajiguda, Hyderabad.
2 The Chief Rationing Officer, Hyderabad, near Anand Talkies, Secunderabad.
3 District Supply Officer, Hyderabad ( city), near Anand Talkies, Secunderabad.
4 2 CCs to the Government Pleader for Civil Supplies, High Court Buildings,Hyderabad. (OUT)
5 2CD copies.