Telangana High Court

AS/1036/2013 of Kaparthi Vara Laxmi Vs Kaparthi Nagaraju on 31 December 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEI\iIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA APPEAL SUIT NO: 1036 OF 2013 Appeal filed under Section 96 r/w Order 41 Rule 1 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree

II

!

I

I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEI\iIBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA

APPEAL SUIT NO: 1036 OF 2013

Appeal filed under Section 96 r/w Order 41 Rule 1 of CPC against theJudgment and Decree daled 3111012O'13 made in O.S.No.65 of 2009 on the file ofthe Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Siddipet, Medak District.

Between:

'1. Kaparthi Vara Laxmi, Wo late Lingam, Aged about 68 years, Occ Housewife,Kaparthi Vara Laxmi, Wo late Lingam, Aged about 68 years, Occ Housewife,

2. Kaparthi Krishnaveni, Wo late Vinay kumar, Aged about 37 years, OccHousewife,Housewife,

3. Kaparthi Lingesh, S/o late Vinay kumar, Age Minor, Occ Student,

4. Kaparthi Manisha, D/o late Vinay kumar, Occ Student, Appellants 3 and 4 are being minors, rep by their mother K.Krishnaveni, theappellant No.2, All are Residents of H No. 7-1-59, Subash Road, Siddipet Town, lVledakDistrict.

...APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS

AND

1. Kaparthi Nagaraju, S/o Chinna Lingam, Aged about 42 years, Occ Business

2. Kaparthi Jagadishwar, S/o Chinna Lingam, Aged about 40 [years, ]OccBusiness,Business, Both are residents of H.No.1-56, Shankarnagar, Narsapur village, R/tvlSiddipet, Medak District.

...RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS

Counsel for the Appellants: M/s. A. Satyasiri Counsel for the Respondents: Shashidhar Guruvula The Court delivered the following JUDGMENT:

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHAAPPEAL SUIT No. 1036 of2013

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT:

This eLppeal suit is filed against the judgment ancl decreedated 31.10.2013 passed in O.S.No.65 of 2OO9 on the fi[e of theSenior Crvil Judge, Siddipet, Medak District.

2. The surt vide O.S.No.65 of 2009 was hled for recovery ofamount u'as decreed on 31.10.2013 against which altpeal ispreferred.

3. l,earncrl counsel for the appellants and learned counse]for lhe respondents prcsen t.

4. lt is represented that during the pendency of the appeal,parties entered into the scttlcment and also a compromise jointmemo was executed between the parties.

5. In view of the compromise joint memo executed betweenthe parties, appeal is allou,ed in Lerms of joint memo.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pendir-rg if ar-Ly, shallstand closec-.stand closec-.

Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To

1. The Senior Civil Judge, Siddipet, Medak District.

2. One CC to M/s. A. Satyasiri Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to Sri Shashidhar Guruvula Advocate [OPUC][OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies(Along with a copy of [joint ]memo)(Along with a copy of [joint ]memo)

Vtligh (x

HIGH COURT

DATED: 3111212024

JUDGMENTAS.No.1036 of 2013

-:':\a$?.vttc;.)\It0I?[254,(:fIir

ALLOWING THE APPEAL IN TERMSOF JOINT MEMO(+ffiu5 ^$cop,,o-Y

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT FryDERABADFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

RUNNING INDEX

A.S.No.1035 of 20'1.3

S1Description of the documentDate ofDate ofPage No.NoPaperfiling(5)(1)(2)(4)1Joint [Memo]28.70.202408.11.2024I-t2Copy of the Settlement Agreement28.10.2024-do-5-(

HYDERABAD

Dared:08-L1 -2024

COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE [STATE OF TEI.ANGANA ][AT]TryDERABAD

A.S.No. 1036 of 2O13

Between:

1. Kaparthi Vara La:rrni, Wife of [Late ][Lingam, ][aged ][about ][76]years, Occupation: Housewife.years, Occupation: Housewife.

2. Kaparthi Krishnaveni, [Wife ][of ][Late ][Vinay Kumar, ][aged ][about]48 yeass, Occupation: Housewife.48 yeass, Occupation: Housewife.

3. I{aparthi Lingesh, Son [of ][l"ate ][Vinay ][Kumar, ][aged. ][about ][27]years, Occupation: Chartered Accountant [in ][Practice.]years, Occupation: Chartered Accountant [in ][Practice.]

4. Kapartii Salthoshi alias [Kaparthi ][Manisha, Daughter ][of ][Late]Vinay Kumar, aged about 23 [years, ][Occupation:]Private Service.Vinay Kumar, aged about 23 [years, ][Occupation:]Private Service.

AII are residents of [H. ]No. [7 ][- ][1 ][- ][59, ][Subash ][Road, ][Siddipet Town,]Siddipet District, Telangana.

...Appellants/Defendants

And

1. Kaparthi Nagaraju, [Son ][of ][Chinna ][Lingam, ][aged ][about ][57]years, Occupation: Business;years, Occupation: Business;

2. Kaparthi Jagadishwar, [Son ][of ][Chinna ][Lingam, ][aged ][about ][55]years, Occupation: Business;years, Occupation: Business; Both residents of H.No. [1-56, ][Shankarnagar, ][Narsapur Village,]Siddipet Mandal, Medak [District.]

. . . Respondents/Plaintiffs

JOINT MEMO

1The ftespondents/Plaintiffs [had ][instituted ][a ][civil suit ][bearing]ftespondents/Plaintiffs [had ][instituted ][a ][civil suit ][bearing]

O.S. No. 65l2OOg on [the ][file ][of ][the Hon'ble ][Senior ][Civil ][Judge,]

f- [{f, ]V [p,Mj.sh'n&voi.]

A3

At

A2-

H.s.-thos$

Siddipet, Medak District, seeking recovery of a sum [of]Rs.6,76,6661- (Rupees Six l-akhs Seventy-Six Thousand [Six]Hun&ed Srxby- Six Only), inclusive of a [principal ]amount ofRs.5,oo,00o/- (Rupees Five [I ]rl'hs Only), allegedly borrowedby the deceased Vinay Kumar during his lifetime on the basisof registered mortgage deed without possession executed byhim and his mother tJle 1st Appellant herein in favour of thePlaintiffs/ Respondent vide document bearing No. 5389 of2OO3 dated 22.1O.2OO3 registered in the offce of the Sub-registrar, Siddipet

2. The Hon'ble Tria.l Court, vide its [judgment ]and decree dated31-10-2013, decreed the suit in favor of theRespondents / Plaintiffs, holding the Appellants/ Deferrdantsjoinfly and severally liable for d sum of Rs.6,76,666/-, withfuture interest at the rate of l2o/o per annum, while [mitingthe liability of Defendants No. 2 to 4 to the estate of thedeceased Vinay Kumar.31-10-2013, decreed the suit in favor of theRespondents / Plaintiffs, holding the Appellants/ Deferrdantsjoinfly and severally liable for d sum of Rs.6,76,666/-, withfuture interest at the rate of l2o/o per annum, while [mitingthe liability of Defendants No. 2 to 4 to the estate of thedeceased Vinay Kumar.

a

Aggrieved by the said judgment and decree, theAppellants/Defendants preferred the above captioned FirstAppeal before this Hon'ble Court. This Hon'ble Court, vide itsinterim order, stayed the execution of the decree dated 31-10-20 13, subject to the condition tJlat the Appellants/Defendantsdeposit 5Oo/o of the decretal amount. In compliance [qdth ]thesaid order, the Appellants/First Part5r have deposited a sum ofRs.5,44,878/-, which may be withdrawn by theRespondents / Second Party, and the First Party/Appellants(+46<, ut h. )<xishr..rvezdAppellants/Defendants preferred the above captioned FirstAppeal before this Hon'ble Court. This Hon'ble Court, vide itsinterim order, stayed the execution of the decree dated 31-10-20 13, subject to the condition tJlat the Appellants/Defendantsdeposit 5Oo/o of the decretal amount. In compliance [qdth ]thesaid order, the Appellants/First Part5r have deposited a sum ofRs.5,44,878/-, which may be withdrawn by theRespondents / Second Party, and the First Party/Appellants(+46<, ut h. )<xishr..rvezd i!

14 ' [ganthoshJ]

L[

Iz-.lc

i!

14 ' [ganthoshJ]

L[

Iz-.lc shall issue No Objection [for withdrawal ][of ][the ][said amount]along with the interest [which ][is ][in ][deposit ][before ][the ][trial]court.

4In the course of the [proceedings, ][given ][the ][close familial]relations between the [Parties ][and ][with ][the ][intervention ][and]mediation of family [elders and well-wishers, ][the ][Parties have]arrived at an amicable [setflement, thereby ][agreeing to resolve]and settle atl their [disputes, ][including ][those ][arising from ][O.S']No. 65/2009 and the [above ][captioned First ][Appeal. ][As ][per ][the]Settlement Agf,eement, [an additional amount ][of Rs'8,30,OOO/-]is being paid by the [Appellants to the ][Respondents ][jointly' ][It]is respectfirlly submitted [that the amount ][satisfies the ][Decree]Amount, and no further [amounts ][are ][payable ][to ][the]Respondents by the [Appellants' ][It ][is ][further ][agreed ][that ][the]Respondents No. I & 2 [will ][release ][the ][registered ][mortgage]deed referred above [vide ][document bearing ][No. ][5389 ][of ][2OO3]dated 22.10.2003 in [favour ][of ][the ][Appellant ][by ][executing]4ecessary [documents ][in ][this ][regard ][before ][the ][Sub-Registrar,]Siddipet.relations between the [Parties ][and ][with ][the ][intervention ][and]mediation of family [elders and well-wishers, ][the ][Parties have]arrived at an amicable [setflement, thereby ][agreeing to resolve]and settle atl their [disputes, ][including ][those ][arising from ][O.S']No. 65/2009 and the [above ][captioned First ][Appeal. ][As ][per ][the]Settlement Agf,eement, [an additional amount ][of Rs'8,30,OOO/-]is being paid by the [Appellants to the ][Respondents ][jointly' ][It]is respectfirlly submitted [that the amount ][satisfies the ][Decree]Amount, and no further [amounts ][are ][payable ][to ][the]Respondents by the [Appellants' ][It ][is ][further ][agreed ][that ][the]Respondents No. I & 2 [will ][release ][the ][registered ][mortgage]deed referred above [vide ][document bearing ][No. ][5389 ][of ][2OO3]dated 22.10.2003 in [favour ][of ][the ][Appellant ][by ][executing]4ecessary [documents ][in ][this ][regard ][before ][the ][Sub-Registrar,]Siddipet.

5In view of the aforementioned [settlemerrt and ][as ][per ][tJ:e ][terms]and conditions mutually [agreed ][upon, ][as per tJle ][Settlement]dated [15-1O-2024 ][the ][Parties respectflrlly ][submit]and conditions mutually [agreed ][upon, ][as per tJle ][Settlement]dated [15-1O-2024 ][the ][Parties respectflrlly ][submit]Agreement that the matter starids [resolved ][in ][its ][entirety and ][no ][furtlrer]between [them. ][Accordingly, ][the ][Parties ][jointly]that the matter starids [resolved ][in ][its ][entirety and ][no ][furtlrer]between [them. ][Accordingly, ][the ][Parties ][jointly]disputes remain pray before this Hon'ble [Court ][t}lat ][the ][pending Appeal ][Suit]No. 1O36/2013 be [disposed ][of ][in ][terms ][of ][the ][settlement' ][Copy]pray before this Hon'ble [Court ][t}lat ][the ][pending Appeal ][Suit]No. 1O36/2013 be [disposed ][of ][in ][terms ][of ][the ][settlement' ][Copy]l< e 6 <, 6 pkr*shrroveTl{

A3

4LA2-

aa.t&l-

of the Settlement Agreement is annexed herewith for the kindperusal of this Hon'ble Court.

6. The Parties further submit that the said setllement has beenentered into voluntarily, without any undue influence,coercion, or pressure, and that they shall bear their respectivecosts incurred in the proceedings.entered into voluntarily, without any undue influence,coercion, or pressure, and that they shall bear their respectivecosts incurred in the proceedings.

Hence this joint memo.

Counsel fot Appellaats

)PJ ,iyAppellant No. LoF'Fa'is [htrc'-v&u]Appellaat IIo.2Appellant No.3H. [ganthshi]Appellaat No.4

-==--Counael for Reapondeatc

lytRerpondent No.1a)c**rRcspondeEt l{o.2

HyderabadDate : 28.10.2024

AGREEMEIIT

THIS SETTLEMENT [AGREEMENT ][(the ]['Agreemeof) ][is ][executed ][on this ][28th ][day ][of]October, 2024 [(the ]"kecution [Date") at SiddiPet, ][Telangana" ][India' ][by and alaong:]

FIRST PART

l. Kaparthi Vard.laxmi, [WiIe ][of ][I-ate ][Lingan, ][aged ][about ][76 yeans, ][Occupation:]Housewi.fe;Housewi.fe;

2. Kaparthi Krblnaueni, [Wife ][of ][l,ate Vinay Kumar, ][aged ][about ][48 ][ye€rs,]Occupation: Housewife;Occupation: Housewife;

3. Kaparihi [Lingesh ][Son ][of ][La.te ][vinay Kumar, ][aged' ][about ][27 yeare, ][occupation:]Chartered Accountant [in ][hactice;]Chartered Accountant [in ][hactice;]

4. Kaparthi'&tnnshi [dias Koparthi ][Manishg ][Dau8hter ][of Late ][Vhay ][Kumar,]a$ed about 23 year8, Occupation: kivate Service;a$ed about 23 year8, Occupation: kivate Service;All residents of [H.No. ][7- ][1-59, Subash Road, ][SiddiPet Toum, SiddiPet ][District,]Telangans.;Telangans.; (Hereinaftet collectively referred to [as ][t}re ]['Appellants/Defendants', ][which]expreseion shall, unless [repugnant ][to ][tlle ][context ][ot ][meaning thereof, ][be]deemed to mean and include [their ][reslrctive ][legal ][heirs, ][auoaeaaora,]representatives, and [assigns) ][of the FIRST PARI;]expreseion shall, unless [repugnant ][to ][tlle ][context ][ot ][meaning thereof, ][be]deemed to mean and include [their ][reslrctive ][legal ][heirs, ][auoaeaaora,]representatives, and [assigns) ][of the FIRST PARI;]

SECOND PART

\. Kopanhi Naganiu, [Son ][of ][Chinna Lin8am, ][aged ][ebout ][57 ][yeers, OccuPation:]Busineeo;Busineeo;

2. Kaparlhi Jagadishuar, [Son ][of ][Chinna ][Lingam, ][aAed ][about ][55 ][year8,]OccuPation: Busi[ess;Both residents of H.No. [1-56, ][shanl(arnagar, ][Narsapur ][vtlage, ][Siddipet]Mandal, Medak Dietrict, Telangana;(Hereinafter collectively [referred ][to ][as the ][oRespondenta/P1aintiffs", ][whieh]expression sha.lt, unless [repugnant ][to ][the ][cont€xt ][or ][meaning thereof, ][be]deemed to mean and [include ][ttreir ][respective ][legaf ][heir8, ][successora,]repreaentatives, arrd [assigns) of ][the ][SECOND ][PART']OccuPation: Busi[ess;Both residents of H.No. [1-56, ][shanl(arnagar, ][Narsapur ][vtlage, ][Siddipet]Mandal, Medak Dietrict, Telangana;(Hereinafter collectively [referred ][to ][as the ][oRespondenta/P1aintiffs", ][whieh]expression sha.lt, unless [repugnant ][to ][the ][cont€xt ][or ][meaning thereof, ][be]deemed to mean and [include ][ttreir ][respective ][legaf ][heir8, ][successora,]repreaentatives, arrd [assigns) of ][the ][SECOND ][PART']

The Appe[ants/Defendants [and ][Respondents/ ][Plaintifis ][are ][hereinalter ][collectively]referred to as ttre ["Partiea" and ][individually ][as ][a ]["Party"]

WHEREAS,

,A- The Respondents/Plaintills [frled ][a ][civil ][suit ][bearing ][O'S' ][No' ][65 ][/2OA9 ][on ][the ][frle]of t]le Hon'ble Senior [Civil Judge, SiddiPet, ][Medak ][District, ][8eeki48 recoveqr ][of a]sum of Rs.6,76,666/- [(Rupees ][Six ][Lakhs ][Seventy-Six ][Thousand Six Hundred]Sixty-Six Only), [inclusive ][of ][a principal ][amount ][of ][Rs'5,O0,O0O/- ][(Rupees Five]I-akhs Only) [ailegedly ][borrowed ][b'y ][I-ate ][Vinay Kumar during ][tlie ][lifetinxe ][on the]basis of registered [mortgage ][deed ][without ][possession ][eaecttcd ][by him ][and his]of t]le Hon'ble Senior [Civil Judge, SiddiPet, ][Medak ][District, ][8eeki48 recoveqr ][of a]sum of Rs.6,76,666/- [(Rupees ][Six ][Lakhs ][Seventy-Six ][Thousand Six Hundred]Sixty-Six Only), [inclusive ][of ][a principal ][amount ][of ][Rs'5,O0,O0O/- ][(Rupees Five]I-akhs Only) [ailegedly ][borrowed ][b'y ][I-ate ][Vinay Kumar during ][tlie ][lifetinxe ][on the]basis of registered [mortgage ][deed ][without ][possession ][eaecttcd ][by him ][and his]

IPage I of [tt]l-/<'Kr"k[?rmqvrnt]tLx6*rtA}'1A)_A3,/"+nLw(?-LRL&ALrd-

IPage I of [tt]l-/<'Kr"k[?rmqvrnt]tLx6*rtA}'1A)_A3,/"+nLw(?-LRL&ALrd- motier t}le 1st Appellant herein in favour of the Plaintiffs/Respondent videdocumqnt besring No. 5389 of 2OO3 dated 22.1O.2OO3 registered in the omce ofthe Sub-regi strar, Siddipet.

B. The Honble Court tria.l vide its judgrnent dated 31-10-2013 decreed lhe suit,holding the AppeUants/Defendants joinuy and severally liable for the anount ofRs.6,76,666/-, a-long wi*r future interest at tie rate of l2Vo per annum, Iimitingthe liability of Defendants No. 2 to 4 to the estate of late Vinay Kumar.holding the AppeUants/Defendants joinuy and severally liable for the anount ofRs.6,76,666/-, a-long wi*r future interest at tie rate of l2Vo per annum, Iimitingthe liability of Defendants No. 2 to 4 to the estate of late Vinay Kumar.

C. Aggrieved by the said [judgrnent, ]the AppeUants/Defendants f,led Appeal Suit No.1036 of 2013 before the Hon'ble High Court for the State of Telangana, which iscurrently pending adjudication. The Hon'ble High Court grarted stay of theDecree dated 31-10-2012 on the condition of deposit of 50% of the de.cretalamount, The Appellants/ F irst Party have paid an amount of Rs.5,44,878/- interms of tlle said order which was withdrawn by the Respondent/ Second Parry;1036 of 2013 before the Hon'ble High Court for the State of Telangana, which iscurrently pending adjudication. The Hon'ble High Court grarted stay of theDecree dated 31-10-2012 on the condition of deposit of 50% of the de.cretalamount, The Appellants/ F irst Party have paid an amount of Rs.5,44,878/- interms of tlle said order which was withdrawn by the Respondent/ Second Parry;

D. Owing to the familial relationahip between the Parties and after mediation by q,ell-wishers and family elders, t].e Parties have mutually agreed to settle all disputesin the terms and conditions outlined heretr, thereby putting an end to tllepending litigation.wishers and family elders, t].e Parties have mutually agreed to settle all disputesin the terms and conditions outlined heretr, thereby putting an end to tllepending litigation.

NOW, THEREFORE, THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSSTH AND THE PARTIES HEREBYAGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. s€ttloE trt of DLputo

1.1. The Appellants /Defendants, in fuU and 6nal setuement oi sll ctai[ls, Iiabilitics,arrd obligations arising from or in connection with the aforementioned civil suitbearing O.S.No.65/2OO9 and the decree dated 31-10-2013, hereby ag.ee to pay tottre Respondents/ Plaintifis a total aum of Ra.8,30,OOO/- (Rupee8 Eight t-qkhs ThirtyThoueend only) (the'Setuement Amounr), in addition to the Fts.5,44,878/-deposited by the First Party in terms of the order of ttre Hontte High Courl 1.2. Out of the Settlement Amount:

a A sum of Rs.4,15,OO0/- (Rupees Four l€l<hs Fiftee[ Thousand onlyl shall bepaid to Respondent/Plainti-ff No. l, Koparthi Naggruju, by way of DemandDraft bearing No.OOO310 dated 28 10-2024 drarvn on Axis Bark, SiddipetBranch.paid to Respondent/Plainti-ff No. l, Koparthi Naggruju, by way of DemandDraft bearing No.OOO310 dated 28 10-2024 drarvn on Axis Bark, SiddipetBranch.

b. An equal sum of Rs.4,15,OO0/- (Rupees Four [:]hs Fi-fteen Thoueand only)shall be paid to Respondent/Plaintiff No. 2, Kapotfhi Jagadishuar, by way ofDernard Draft bearing No. O00311 dated 28-lO-2O24 drawn on Axis Balk,Siddipet Bra-nchshall be paid to Respondent/Plaintiff No. 2, Kapotfhi Jagadishuar, by way ofDernard Draft bearing No. O00311 dated 28-lO-2O24 drawn on Axis Balk,Siddipet Bra-nch

2. Cloaurc of Ll6gation

2.1. The Appellants/ De{endants shatl, w'it}rir a period of One Week from t}reExecution Date, file appropriate petitions before t}le Honble HiAh Court lor the State Pago 2 0f4\z-5 [{ ][- ][sr ]K, [srj.shTo-vd4^-$e" "1/.A1*x-{3y(^M+"a,LA\_lL2-*&td_.

of Telangana, [seeking ][the ][closure ][of AS No' ][1036/2013' ][ard ][the]Respondents/Plaintiffe [shall ][rerrder unconditional cooperation ][and ][support ][in ][a1l]r"ui".t" necesaary to [facilitate ][the ][exPeditious ][closure ][of the said litiSation' ][The]Respondents/Plaintifrs [shall ][also take ][neceasaty 8teP8 ][for ][tl.e ][closure ][of ][the]negistered Mortgage [Deed referred ][above ][bearing Document 538912003 ][dated]22:rc.2oo3 by executiflg [neceasary docum€rrts ][for ][the ][discharge ][of ][tj.e ][said]dosuments 2.2. Tine aforementioned [Demand ][Drafts ][shall ][be ][handed ][over ][to ][t}te]Respondents/Plaintilfs [on ][ttre date of closure of the ][Appeal Suit ][No' ][1036/2013 ][by]the Hontle [High Court.]

3. Rolosse and [Dlschatge]

3. l. Upon [receipit of ][t}le settlement ][Amount ][in ][accordance ][with ][the ][terrns ][herein' ][the]nespondents/niaintifis, [on their own ][behalf ][and ][on behatf of ][their ][respective ][heirs']*r"L"uo.", [rePresentatives, ][and ][assigns, hereby irrevocably ][and ][unconditionally]release, waive, [and ][discharge ][the ][Appetlants/Defendants ][and ][their ][respective ][heirs']auccesaora, [representatives, ][and ][assigns ][from ][any ][and ][atl ][daims' ][liabilities']demands, actions, [suits, ][or ][proceedings, ][whether ][known ][or unlanown' arising ][out of]or in connection [E'ith the ][subject ][matter ][of ][O'S' ][No' ][6512009 8nd ][A'S' ][No']lA36l2}t3, [including ][but ][not ][lirnited ][to ][the ][principal ][amount' intereat' costs' ][and]any other related [claims.]

Both [parties ][a€tee ][that ][A.S.No.1O36/2013 ][bc ][closcd ][irr ][terms ][of ][this ][out ][of ][court]gettlement.

4. Wtt.hdrawsl [of ][Clalas ][by ][Tttrd ][P'rtle8]

The ResPondents/Plaintills [hercby ][confrm that ][no ][t}ird ][parties ][have any ][valid ][or]pendlng ctaims or [acuons ][aSainst ][the ApPellants/Deferdants ][in connection ][with ][the]subjecLatter [of ][O.S. ][No. 65/2O09 ][or A'S' No' ][7036/2013' ][Should any such ][third-]party ctaims arise, [the ][Respondents/PtaintilTs ][shail take ][all ][necessary ][steps ][to]"lruure "uch [claims.are ][prompfly withdrawn ][or ][dismissed' ][ald ][shall ][indemniff ][tl-te]Appellants/ [Defendants against any ][liatrility ][arising ][from ][such ][claims']

5. Birdtsg Elfoct

This Agreement [shall be ][binding ][upon ][and ][shall ][inure ][to ][the ][benefit ][of ][the ][Parties]heretoLd their [respective legal ][heirs, ][successors' ][executors' ][admitriskators' ][and]permitted assigns.

6. lf, lscella.oeous [Provlslons]

13.1. Entire [Agreement: ][This ][Agreement ][constitutes ][t-l.e ][entire ][agreement ][between]the Parties with [respect ][to the ][subject ][matter ][hereof ][and ][supersedes ][all ][prior]understandings, [agreernents, and ][rePresentalions, whether ][oral or ][written' ][regarding]such subject [rnatter.]

t

a-!

13.2. Governing l,aw: This Agreement shall be governed by arrd con8tr-ued inaccordance with the laws of India, and any dispute8 arising oLrt of or in connectiontlIith this Agreernent sha]l be subject to ttre excluaive jurisdictron of t}le courts atHyderabad, Telangara- 13.3. Amendment. Any modi.fication or arnendment to this Agreement sha]] be inwriting aad signed by all pa,-ties hereto.writing aad signed by all pa,-ties hereto.

IN WITNFSS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on tile date,month, and year first above written.

SIGNED AND DELIVERED by the within-named:

Appellants/Defend ants

Yo4**3

2.1(' t<trJ\shnov [bnt]

41.1, [<^..thoshi]

RespondentslPlaintiffs

1Witnesses

3-s---

2 /)t2

Page { of4

J*a'

fls[\'?-]

MEDAK:: DISTRICT

tHIGH COURT AT HYDERABADFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

tZl2

l2A.S. No. ["1036 ]of 2W

rcq113

JOrNT [MEMO]

6tr,gCoI}.r)*RECEIvE0

l\

Flied on: @.11..2024

Filed by

A. SATYASTRT (15309)AdvocateCounsel for the Petitioner

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead