Telangana High Court
WP/5359/1999 of P.Srirama Murthy, Vs A.P.State Agro Industries Development Corpn Ltd., on 24 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5359 of 1999 Between: P. Srirama Murthy … Petitioner AND A.P.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE,ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER,TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY
PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.5359 of 1999
Between:
P. Srirama Murthy
… Petitioner
AND
A.P. State Agro Industries DevelopmentCorporation Limited, AC Guards,Hyderabad, rep., by its Vice Chairman &Managing Director.
… Respondent
Counsel for the petitioner : Sri G. Vidya Sagar This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.5359 of 1999
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… … Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ,order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ ofMandamus declaring the proceedingsNo.Pers/AM(P)/12943/83 dated 21.11.1998 of the respondentherein as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of naturaljustice and consequently set aside the same and pass suchother order or orders as it may deem fit and proper in thecircumstances of the case.”
At the hearing, Sri G. Vidyasagar, learned counsel for thepetitioner submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel, thewrit petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous,WPMP.No.6691 of 1999 filed by the petitioner for interim relief isalso dismissed as infructuous.
Date: 24.12.2008ES
____________________________
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J