Telangana High Court

WP/17961/2005 of Sushmita Filling Station, Vs Indianm Oil Corporation Limited, on 30 December 2008

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 17961 of 2005 Between: Sushmita Filling Station, Indian Oil Dealer, Rep. by the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDYWRIT PETITION NO : 17961 of 2005

Between:

Sushmita Filling Station, Indian Oil Dealer, Rep. by the Manager, P. Rama Rao S/o. Bhasker Rao, Aged 33 yrs, R/o.Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam-530 041,

..... PETITIONER

AND

1 Indianm Oil Corporation Limited, Rep. by the Senior Divisional RetailSales Manager, 8th Floor, LIC Building, Jeevitha Bheema Road, Visakhapatnam 530 004, 2 The Sales Officer (Retail) Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Marketing Division, Visakhapatnam,

.....RESPONDENT(S)

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will bepleased to to issue a writ, in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any otherappropriate Writ, direction or order declaring the order VR/564, dt. 11-8-2005of the Senior Divisional Retail Sales Manager, Indian Oil CorporationLimited, Marketing Division, Visakha Divisional Office, Visakhapatnam, asillegal and void, and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Courtmay deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.KAMLAKAR

Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.R.RAGHUNANDAN

The Court made the following :

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDYW.P.No.17961 of 2005

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been instructedto withdraw the writ petition.

In view of the representation made by the learned counsel, the writpetition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

____________________

L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J

30.12.2008Note: C.C. in one week.B/o.Stp To1.2CCs to2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}

// TRUE COPY //

..... REGISTRARSECTION OFFICER

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead