Telangana High Court
CC/1145/2017 of SK.SAFIA SULTANA BEGUM, KHAMMAM DIST Vs SAMBASHIVA RAO, KHAMMAM DIST on 29 December 2023
;1 ': I,ft'''. ,i t$o3l rNrHE H|GH ""r.[[ff$JI"TJsE oF TELANGNNN FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CONT EMPT CASE NO:'1145 OF 2017 contempt case under section 'r0 ro 12 of contempt of courts Act
,':;;.i'
':.1,-'+x,.'.,. .i'i;h;1 ': I,ft'''. ,i
t$o3l
oF TELANGNNN
rNrHE [H|GH ]""r.[[ff$JI"TJsE
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
;,:
,:
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
CONT EMPT CASE NO:'1145 OF 2017
ipunish contempt the respondent case under for contempt section ['r0 ]of ro court 12 of contempt of in wilfuHy not courts imprementing Act rg71 thetoaorders dated 08.12.2016 in W.p.No.42695 0f 2016.
ffi;
Between:
Sk.Safia Sultana Beoum. Wo. Late Janimiya, Muslim, Aged aboKonijerla, Khammarn-Disirict.
ut 81 years, Ryo
,J --i
,
,, :'".683,./!t-r [_v-^kn]...PET|IoNER [:--'*:f[.;j]':-1 i,:
ANDSambashiva Rao, The Tahsildar, Konijerla, Konijerla Mandal, Khammam DistrictRESPONDENTCounset for the petitioner: SRl. KASIBHATLA SAAKETHCounset for the Respondent: Gp FOR REVENUEThe Court made the following: ORDER
i
RESPONDENT
!I.,11..:$
r'-+..:. -:-.=,,.1 a: ii.}s{!!;A'&ileii.}s{!!;A'&ile..: :;it.d+*!Ei: >n#. . r+-ri6lA.'ry4. . r+-ri6lA.'ry4. r+-ri6lA.'ry4r+-ri6lA.'ry4, - ::tEt; ''"lq''' ,'{ 't-i i a: ii.}s{!!;A'&ileii.}s{!!;A'&ile :;it.d+*!Ei: >n#. . r+-ri6lA.'ry4. . r+-ri6lA.'ry4. r+-ri6lA.'ry4r+-ri6lA.'ry4
. . r+-ri6lA.'ry4. r+-ri6lA.'ry4r+-ri6lA.'ry4. r+-ri6lA.'ry4r+-ri6lA.'ry4r+-ri6lA.'ry4- ::tEt; ''"lq'
n'l
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENTVAS RAOCONTEMPT CASE No.1145 of2Ol7
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The Contempt Case is filed for non-implementation of theorder, dated 08.12.2016 [passed ]by this [Court ][in ][W.P.No.42695 of]2016.order, dated 08.12.2016 [passed ]by this [Court ][in ][W.P.No.42695 of]2016.
2. A perusal of the [order, ][dated ][O8' ][12'2O16 ][shows ][that ][this]CourtwhiledisposingofW.P.No.426g5of2016directedtherespondent - [Tahsildar ][to ][dispose ][of ][the ][representation' ][dated]15.06.2016 [and ][pass ][appropriate ][orders ][in ][accordance ][with ][law']
3. The respondent/ [contemnor ][hled ][counter ][a-ffidavit stating]that pursuant [to ][the ][order ][passed ][by ][this ][Court' ][the ][respondent]issued memo [uide ][R'C'No ][B/ ][1265l2ol5' ][dated ][l4'O7 ]['2017]the [petitioner ][that ][it ][is ][not ][possible ][to ][grant ][pattadar]informing pass books [arrd ][title ][deeds']
3. In vie-,r' of [the ][compliance ][of the ][order ][of ][this ][Court']no+ further [adjudication is required ][in ][the present ][contempt ][case']
5. AccordinglY, [the ][ContemPt ][Case][ ls][ closed. ][However, ][the]is [grarLted ][libertv ][to ][avail the ][remedies ][as ][available ][under]petitioner I
Iaw including questioning the rejection memo, dated, L4.OZ.2OITpassed by the respondent. No costs.
Miscellaleous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed
1
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2911212023
ORDER
GC.No.1145 of 2017 [,,r.n]
CLOSING THE CC
a.rr*fel(g)Y'v*
R[Tfl5 ][S ][I,9].(.>^e[o]c^({1(l'l E am ?wta)*$-sPerc*+€s
..1t
A:I
'/
ffi
;+1F:1, ' l,i:$'".a,.r"rri:l
4t 1,j1, ,ilL+n&-, :i r-r .f.. a'- ii6i ;rEliisEl6 [.-u]4u . t?!{!tlE4i }Yi :fnliiffi*ia.l. I :'.'r'l 7",.i-t5a-. E:, :. 1
tl' i ri'i.'"j [j+-r'ilit ]'lI t:"tri'i- l f, :S.:.$i.#, L€"ilr*.3 ti':j:jt