Telangana High Court
WP/38983/2012 of Gurram Shankaraiah Vs The District Collector, on 28 December 2012
SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.38983 of 2012 ORDER: The relief sought for in this Writ Petition is to declare the action of the respondents in not mutating the names of the petitioners in the revenue records in the place of their late father in respect of the land in
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANWRIT PETITION No.38983 of 2012
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The relief sought for in this Writ Petition is to declare the actionof the respondents in not mutating the names of the petitioners in therevenue records in the place of their late father in respect of the landin Survey No.59/4 admeasuring Acs.2.03 guntas situated atKyathanpalli Shivar, Mandamarri Mandal, Adilabad District, pursuantto the representation dated 05.11.2012, as arbitrary and illegal.
Learned Government Pleader for Revenue (Telangana Area)would submit that, if an application in Form VI-A, in terms of Section4(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass BooksAct, 1971 (the Act), and Rule 18 of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Landand Pattadar Pass Books Rules, 1989 (the Rules), is filed by thepetitioners, the second respondent would consider the same, inaccordance with law, and pass orders thereupon at the earliest.
Sri Gajanand Chakravarthi, learned Counsel for the petitioners,would submit that an application, in the prescribed form, would be filedwithin two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. Incase such an application is filed, in accordance with the formprescribed under the Act and the Rules made thereunder, within theaforesaid period, the second respondent shall consider the same, andpass orders thereupon, in accordance with law within two monthsthereafter.
The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Themiscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
______________________________
(RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J)28.12.2012 vs