WP/37820/2022 of Dasari Bhaskar Vs The State of Telangana on 31 December 2024

1. The Tahsildar, Balapur Mandal, Balapur, Ranga Reddy District

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur Revenue Division, Ranga ReddyDistrict.District.

3. The State of Telangana, Rep.by [its ]Prinicipal Secretary, [Revenue]Department, Secretariate, Hyderabad.Department, Secretariate, Hyderabad.

4. N. Maisaiah S/o. Late Kashaiah, Aged about 78 [years, ]Occ: Labour, [Rl.io.]Kurmalguda, Saidabad, Hyderabad.Kurmalguda, Saidabad, Hyderabad.

(R4 is impleaded as per C.O. dt. 10.09.2024 in lA. No.2l2o22l

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more in the nature of Mandamusdeclaring action of the respondents in highhandedly interfering with thepossession and enjoyment of the petitioners in the land situated in Sy.No.46admeasuring to an extent of Ac.6.00 gts. situated in Meerpet Village of BalapurMandal of Ranga Reddy District and trying to disposes without any notice isarbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300(4) of the constitution oflndia and contrary to the orders passed by this Honble Court inW.P.No.31559i1998 dated 13.06.1999 and consequentially declare that theRespondents cannot interefere with the possession and enjoyment of thePetitioners without following the due process of Law in lands situated insy.No.46 admeasuring to an extent of Ac.6.00 gts. situated in Meerpet village ofBalapur Mandal of Ranga Reddy District.

Petition under Section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased toissue an interim direction directing the Respondents not to interfere with thepossession and enjoyment of the petitioners in the land situated in Sy.No.46admeasuring to an extent of Ac.6.00 gts. situated in Meerpet Village of balapurMandal of Ranga Reddy District pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI R. PRASHANTH REPRESENTING FORSRI V. YADU KRISHNA SAINATH

Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: GP FOR REVENUE

Counsel for the Respondent No.4: M/s. S. TULASI DAS

WRIT PETITION NO: 37820 0F 2022:

Between:

1. DasariH.No.'l7-29111 [_Btaskat ], SirlaHilla, Meerpet, BalapurMaridal, R.R. [. ][S/o.. Narsimha, ][4gea. ][28 ][years, ][Occ. ]Distridt[Agriculture,]Rl/oH.No.'l7-29111 [_Btaskat ], SirlaHilla, Meerpet, BalapurMaridal, R.R. [. ][S/o.. Narsimha, ][4gea. ][28 ][years, ][Occ. ]Distridt[Agriculture,]Rl/o

2. Dasari Narsimha, S/O.D. Balaiah, Age 60 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.H.No.17-29111 , SirtaHilla, Meerpet, BatipurMaridat, R.R. OistridtH.No.17-29111 , SirtaHilla, Meerpet, BatipurMaridat, R.R. Oistridt

3. Dasari Babu, S/o. D. Balaiah, Age 51 years, Occ. Agricutlure, Ri/o.H.No.l_114, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, Ranga Reddy District.114, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, Ranga Reddy District.

a. Pg".rti. Poch-aiah, S/o.DasariBalajah,. Age 46 years, Occ. Agricutture,R/o.H.No.1 -137, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, Ranga Reddy bistrict.R/o.H.No.1 -137, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, Ranga Reddy bistrict.

S Pg.?i'.. M91qmma, W/o.D.Sammaiah, Age 45 years, Occ. Agriculture,R/o. H. No. H. No. No. 1 -'t -'t 34. Meerpet, BalapurMandal, Ranga Reddy Dis[ri;i.Dis[ri;i.34. Meerpet, BalapurMandal, Ranga Reddy Dis[ri;i.Dis[ri;i.R/o. H. No. H. No. No. 1 -'t -'t 34. Meerpet, BalapurMandal, Ranga Reddy Dis[ri;i.Dis[ri;i.34. Meerpet, BalapurMandal, Ranga Reddy Dis[ri;i.Dis[ri;i.

R/o. H. No. H. No. No. 1 -'t -'t 34. Meerpet, BalapurMandal, Ranga Reddy Dis[ri;i.Dis[ri;i.' il3:?5"? [TilB?''[vi;.? i fl,%i:'ft 3o%", Xl Jfi Bi:, [occ ][As ][ricu ][rtu ][re, ][R/o ][1 ][- ][1 ][3 ][3,][TilB?''[vi;.? i fl,%i:'ft 3o%", Xl Jfi Bi:, [occ ][As ][ricu ][rtu ][re, ][R/o ][1 ][- ][1 ][3 ][3,]

3o%", Xl Jfi Bi:, Xl Jfi Bi:, Jfi Bi:, Bi:, 7 R6.Hir".i-i;i','rii;"lol,t, Pg.gry Puttamma, Wo.D.Shankaraiah, Aqe 63Asriculsure,BarapurMandar, Ringa *Jffi,"or,ti. R6.Hir".i-i;i','rii;"lol,t, Pg.gry Puttamma, Wo.D.Shankaraiah, Aqe 63Asriculsure,BarapurMandar, Ringa *Jffi,"or,ti.

8. Dasari Jangaiah, S/o.DasariAdivaiah, Age 40 years, Occ. Agrictiture Rl/o.'1-139, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, Ranga Reddy District.139, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, Ranga Reddy District.

9. Dasari Narsimha, S/o.D.Pochaiah, Age 51 years, Occ. Agriculture,R/o.H.No.1-'12511, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, Ranga Reddy District.R/o.H.No.1-'12511, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, Ranga Reddy District.

10. Dasari Balraj, S/o. Yellaiah, Aged.47 [years, ]Occ. Agriculture, [Rl/o. ][H.No.'1-]136, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. District136, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. District '1 1 . Dasari Sudhakar, S/o. Pentaiah, Aged. 40 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.H.No.1-135, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. Diskict.H.No.1-135, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. Diskict.

12. Dasari Sammaiah, S/o.D.Pochaiah, Age 46 [years, ]Occ. [Agriculture,]R/o.H.No.1-109, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. District.R/o.H.No.1-109, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. District.

13. Dasari Balvanth, S/o.Yellaiah, Age 40 [years, ]Occ. Agriculture [Rl/o.H.No.1-137,]Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. District.Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. District.

l4.Chitran Ramulu, S/o.Muthaiah, Age 76 [years, ]Occ. [Agriculture, ][Rl/o.H.No.1-]137, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. District.137, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. District.

15. Bommani Narsimha, S/o.8. Jangaiah, Age 74 [years, ][Occ. ][agriculture,]R/o.H.No.1-100, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. District.R/o.H.No.1-100, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. District.

16. Bommani Tulasaiah, S/o.B.Pochaiah, Age 53 [years, ][Occ. ][Agriculture,]Rl/o.H.No.2-8, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. [District.]Rl/o.H.No.2-8, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. [District.]

17. Bommani Narsamma, Wo.B.Yadaiah, Age 49 [years, ][Occ. ][Agriculture,]FUo.H.No.2-1, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. District.FUo.H.No.2-1, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. District.

'lS.Bommani Jagan, S/o. Pochaiah, Age 47 years, Occ. Agriculture, H.No.'l-97,Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. District.Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. District.

lg.Bommani Babamma, Wo.Yadaiah, [Age ][58 ][years, occ. Agricuture, ][Fl/o.1-104,]Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. District.Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. District.

20. Bommani Laxmamma, Wio.B. Shankaraiah, [Age ][60 ][years, Occ. ][Agriculture']Rlio.H. No.'l -1 02, Meerpet, Balapurlvlandal, [R. ][R. ][District.]Rlio.H. No.'l -1 02, Meerpet, Balapurlvlandal, [R. ][R. ][District.]

...PETITIONERS

AND1. The State of Telangana, Represented [by its Principal Secretary, Revenue]Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.1. The State of Telangana, Represented [by its Principal Secretary, Revenue]Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy [District.]

lr

3. The Trhsildar, BalapurMandal, Ranga [Reddy ][District.]

4. The Rickshaw Pullers and Daily Waged [Workers Association, ][Rep. ][by ][its]President N. Mysaiah, Rep. by GPA-Holder [S.Sree Harsha, S/o. ][Tulai ][Das,]Aged. 37 yearq Occ. Business, [Ryo. ][1 ]7-1-388/8/1 , [Laxminagar, ][Saidabad]Colony, HyderabadPresident N. Mysaiah, Rep. by GPA-Holder [S.Sree Harsha, S/o. ][Tulai ][Das,]Aged. 37 yearq Occ. Business, [Ryo. ][1 ]7-1-388/8/1 , [Laxminagar, ][Saidabad]Colony, Hyderabad

5. Rudra Raiaiah [(Died), ]Sio. Late [Narsaiah, Rep. ][by ][Venkatesham, aged about]30 years, Occ. Private Employee, [Fl/o. ][Meerpet ][(V), ][Balapur ][(M)' ][Ranga]Reddy District.30 years, Occ. Private Employee, [Fl/o. ][Meerpet ][(V), ][Balapur ][(M)' ][Ranga]Reddy District.

6. D. Lingamma, W/o. Lingaiah, [Aged about ][65 ][years,.Occ. Household, ][Fl/o.]H.No.-17-75, Sirla HillsColony, [lMeerpet ][Village, Balapur Mandal, ][Ranga]Reddy District.H.No.-17-75, Sirla HillsColony, [lMeerpet ][Village, Balapur Mandal, ][Ranga]Reddy District.

7. Bala Prasad, S/o. Ramulu, Aged about 65years, Occ. Private Service, R|/o.H.No. 19-12-A, Guntijangaiah Nagar, L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad.H.No. 19-12-A, Guntijangaiah Nagar, L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad.

B. K. Pandu, S/o. Narayana, Aged about 68 [years, ]Occ. Employee, Rl/o. H.No. 2-138, HMT Colony, Habsiguda, Hyderabad.138, HMT Colony, Habsiguda, Hyderabad.

9. C. Kamalamma, W/o. Chandi Keshava, Aged about 70 [years, ]Occ.Housewife, Rl/o. H.No. 77-121A, Kothakota, Pochampalli Village, YadadriBhongir District.Housewife, Rl/o. H.No. 77-121A, Kothakota, Pochampalli Village, YadadriBhongir District.

10. Punna Chandra Shekar, S/o. Keshavulu, Aged about 65 [years, ]Occ. Weaver,Rl/o. H.No. 77-3, Kothakota, Pochampalli Village, Yadadri Bhongir District.Rl/o. H.No. 77-3, Kothakota, Pochampalli Village, Yadadri Bhongir District.

1 1. Budda Chandramouli, S/o. Late Narsimulu, Aged about 68 years, Occ.Labour, Rlio. H.No. 11-1-1390112, Sanjay Gandhi Nagar, Warasiguda,Secunderabad.Labour, Rlio. H.No. 11-1-1390112, Sanjay Gandhi Nagar, Warasiguda,Secunderabad.

12. Miryala Raju, S/o. Bala Swamy, Aged about 58 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o.H.No. 11-12-1368/1 , Ambemagar, Jamila Osmania, Hyderabad.H.No. 11-12-1368/1 , Ambemagar, Jamila Osmania, Hyderabad.

13. K. Lingaiah, S/o. Mallaiah, Aged about 70 years, Occ. Weaver, Rl,to. H.No. 77-89, Kothakota, Pochampalli Village, Yadadri Bhongir District.89, Kothakota, Pochampalli Village, Yadadri Bhongir District.

14. Rudra Balachandram, S/o, Ramulu, Aged about 67 years, Occ. Weaver, Fl/o.H.No. 77 162112, Kothakota, Pochampalli Village, Yadadri Bhongir District.H.No. 77 162112, Kothakota, Pochampalli Village, Yadadri Bhongir District.

'15. K. Susheela, W/O Bikashapati, Aged about 65 years, Occ.HouseWife, Rl/OH.No. 1 1 -1 2-1 379/1, Sanjay Gandhi Nagar, Warasiguda, Secunderabad.H.No. 1 1 -1 2-1 379/1, Sanjay Gandhi Nagar, Warasiguda, Secunderabad.

'16.G. Laxminarayana, S/o. Rama Swamy, Aged about 72 years, Occ.Dependant, Rl/o. H.No. 11-12-137113, Sanjay Gandhi Nagar, Jamia Osmania,Hyderabad.Dependant, Rl/o. H.No. 11-12-137113, Sanjay Gandhi Nagar, Jamia Osmania,Hyderabad.

17. Edem Shakuntala, Wo. Ayodhya, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Housewife, Rl/o.H.No. 76/74, Old Village, Gattuppal, Narayanapur, Yadadri Bhongir District.H.No. 76/74, Old Village, Gattuppal, Narayanapur, Yadadri Bhongir District.

18. K. Venkatesham, S/o. Ramulu, Aged about 72 yearc, Occ. Private Employee,R/o. 10-1 1-62, parsigutta, Secunderabad.R/o. 10-1 1-62, parsigutta, Secunderabad.

'19.K. Narasimha, S/o. Kankaiah, Aged about 78 years, Occ. Dependant, Rl/o.l1.No.1 -67 122, Dattatreya Nagar, Karwan, Hyderabad.l1.No.1 -67 122, Dattatreya Nagar, Karwan, Hyderabad.

20. R. Jaihind, S/o Sarvaiah, Aged about 69 years, Occ. Watchman, R/o. H.No. 3-72lA, SR Nagar Colony, Jagadgirigutta, Balanagar, Hyderabad.72lA, SR Nagar Colony, Jagadgirigutta, Balanagar, Hyderabad.

21. Adepu Vijay Kumar, S/o Srinivas, Aged about 56 years, Occ. Business, R:/o.H.No. 3-62lC, Nallakunta, Hyderabad.H.No. 3-62lC, Nallakunta, Hyderabad.

22. M. Prabhakar, S/o Elamaiah, Aged about 67 years, Occ. Labour, Rl/o.H.No.1 0-62-3, Vinayaka Nagar, Parsigutta, Secunderabad.1 0-62-3, Vinayaka Nagar, Parsigutta, Secunderabad.

23. K. Balamma, W/o. Venkateshwarlu, Aged about 63 years, Occ. Housewife,Fl1o. H.No. 1 1 -12-163911 1, Bombay Colony, Warasiguda, Secunderabad.Fl1o. H.No. 1 1 -12-163911 1, Bombay Colony, Warasiguda, Secunderabad.

24. Allay Ganesh, S/o. Bala Narasaiah, Aged 55 years, Occ. Carpenter, Fl/o.H.No. 7-15-C, YMCA, Narayanguda, Hyderabad.H.No. 7-15-C, YMCA, Narayanguda, Hyderabad.

25. Satyanarayana, S/o Durgaiah, Aged72 years, Occ. Welder, F/o. H.No.. 11-1 2-1 520, Ambernagar, Warasiguda, Secunderabad.1 2-1 520, Ambernagar, Warasiguda, Secunderabad.

26. Smt. S. !9rs.ammg (Die_d), Wio. Late Yadagiri, Rep. by her son S. SureshKumar, S/o. Late Smt. S. Narsamma W/o Late yadqiri. aqed about 46 vearsOcc. Private Service, R/o. H.No. 16-1-s2st11, SaidiOdd,"tfydeiaOiO sdOOStj.Kumar, S/o. Late Smt. S. Narsamma W/o Late yadqiri. aqed about 46 vearsOcc. Private Service, R/o. H.No. 16-1-s2st11, SaidiOdd,"tfydeiaOiO sdOOStj.

27. K. Laxmi Bai, W/o Late K. Babu, Aged about 57 [years, ]Occ. Housewife, Rl/o12-1-112, Bandlaguda, Nagole, Hyderabad.12-1-112, Bandlaguda, Nagole, Hyderabad.

28. Boddula Suvarna, W/o Sriramulu, Aged about 61 [years, ]Occ. Housewife, [Rl/o]H. No. 1 0-59/4, [trlanikanta Colony, Parsigutta, Secunderabad.H. No. 1 0-59/4, [trlanikanta Colony, Parsigutta, Secunderabad.

29. Marineni Gaftaiah, S/o Rajaiah, Aged about 66 [years, ]Occ. Labour, [R/o. ][69-]59, Laxminagar, Uppal, Hyderabad.59, Laxminagar, Uppal, Hyderabad.

30. Damodar, Sio Jaggaiah, Aged about 65 [years, ]Occ. Labour, [R:/o. ]H.No.6114213, Road No. 6, Amberpet, Hyderabad.6114213, Road No. 6, Amberpet, Hyderabad.

31 . K. Nagabhushanam, S/o Balaswamy, Aged about 53 [years, ]Occ. Business,R/o H.No. 2-5913, Medchal, Medchal Malkajgiri District.R/o H.No. 2-5913, Medchal, Medchal Malkajgiri District.

32. N. Shobha Rani, W/o. Prabhakar, Aged about 60 [years, ]Occ. Housewife, [Rl/o]H.No. 6-72, Nagole, Hyderabad.H.No. 6-72, Nagole, Hyderabad.

33. Gaddam Narasimha, S/o Chittaiah, Aged about 70 [years, ]Occ. [Weaver, ][Rl/o]H.No. 51/2, Koyyalagudem, Choutuppal, Yadadri Bhongir District.H.No. 51/2, Koyyalagudem, Choutuppal, Yadadri Bhongir District.

34. Vallakirthi Perumal, Slo Narsaiah, Aged about 70 [years, ]Occ. [Labour, ][Rl/o.]H.No. 7-12-15, Chilkalguda, Secunderabad.H.No. 7-12-15, Chilkalguda, Secunderabad.

35. K. Lakshmamma, Wo. Yellaiah, Aged about [78 years, Occ. Household, ][Rep.]by T. Radha Wio Ankamma Rao, Aged about 38 [years, Occ. Private]Employee, Fl/o H.No. 17-110, Sirla Hills Colony, Meerpet Village, [Balapur]Mandal, R.R.District.by T. Radha Wio Ankamma Rao, Aged about 38 [years, Occ. Private]Employee, Fl/o H.No. 17-110, Sirla Hills Colony, Meerpet Village, [Balapur]Mandal, R.R.District.

36. M. Yellamma, W/o Sailoo, Aged about 76 [yea6, ]Occ. Household, [Rep.]byT.Raieshwari W/o. Bhadra, Aged about 40 [years, ]Occ. [Household, ][Rl/o]H.No17-1i4lA, Sirla Hills, Meerpet Village, Balapur Mandal, [R.R.District.]T.Raieshwari W/o. Bhadra, Aged about 40 [years, ]Occ. [Household, ][Rl/o]H.No17-1i4lA, Sirla Hills, Meerpet Village, Balapur Mandal, [R.R.District.]

37. Smt. R. Nirmala, Wo R. Narsimha, Aged about 60 [years, ][Occ. ][Housewife,]R/o Singarayakonda, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh, Bep [by Repqltg]Mark, S7o Eilaiah, aged 35 [years, ]Occ. Private Employee, [Rl/o. ][H.No. ][4216,]Lenin Nagar, Meerpet Village, Ranga Reddy District.R/o Singarayakonda, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh, Bep [by Repqltg]Mark, S7o Eilaiah, aged 35 [years, ]Occ. Private Employee, [Rl/o. ][H.No. ][4216,]Lenin Nagar, Meerpet Village, Ranga Reddy District.

38. Smt. S. Anjamma, Wo. S. Madhava Reddy, Aged about 61 [years, ][Occ.]Housewife, Rl/o Meerpet Village, Ranga Reddy District. [Rep. ][by ][Bommani]Jayamma Wo D. Srinu, Aged about 38 [years, ]Occ. [Household,No ][17-226,]Sirla Hills Colony, Meerpet, Ranga Reddy [District.]Housewife, Rl/o Meerpet Village, Ranga Reddy District. [Rep. ][by ][Bommani]Jayamma Wo D. Srinu, Aged about 38 [years, ]Occ. [Household,No ][17-226,]Sirla Hills Colony, Meerpet, Ranga Reddy [District.]

39. Smt. M. Venkatamma, Wo M. Durgaiah, Aged [about ][63 years, Occ. ][Labour,]Rl/o. Sirla Hills Colony, Meerpet, Ranga Reddy [District. Rep. by ][K ][Srinvani]Wo K. Srinivasa Chdry, Aged 35 [years, ]Occ. Private employee, [Rl/o. ][H.No.]59-271A, Meerpet Village, Balapur Mandal, Ranga [Reddy ][District.]Rl/o. Sirla Hills Colony, Meerpet, Ranga Reddy [District. Rep. by ][K ][Srinvani]Wo K. Srinivasa Chdry, Aged 35 [years, ]Occ. Private employee, [Rl/o. ][H.No.]59-271A, Meerpet Village, Balapur Mandal, Ranga [Reddy ][District.]

40. R. Somakka, Wo Muthaiah, Aged about [B0 ][years, Occ. Household' ][Rgp. ][by]Smt. S. Renuka Devi, D/o. Yadagiri, Aged 53 [years, Occ. Household, ][Fl/o.]H.No. 16-1-24i208/505, North East Residency, [Saidabad, Hyderabad 500059]Smt. S. Renuka Devi, D/o. Yadagiri, Aged 53 [years, Occ. Household, ][Fl/o.]H.No. 16-1-24i208/505, North East Residency, [Saidabad, Hyderabad 500059]

41 . S. Sandhya, W/o S. Ramesh, Aged about [40 ][years, Occ. Household, ][R9p ][by]Smt. B. V-asantha Wo Venkatesh, Aged about [40 ][years, Occ. ][Household,]R:io. Road No. 6, Suryanagar Colony, Mallapur, Medchal [District.]Smt. B. V-asantha Wo Venkatesh, Aged about [40 ][years, Occ. ][Household,]R:io. Road No. 6, Suryanagar Colony, Mallapur, Medchal [District.]

42. K. Shobha Rani, Wo. Swamy, Aged about 67 [years, Occ. Housewife' ][Rl/o]H.No. 9-3211, Shankarmutt, Hyderabad.H.No. 9-3211, Shankarmutt, Hyderabad.

43. Vanam Yadagiri, S/o. Satyanarayana, Aged about [70 years, ][Oq9 ][Labour,]Fl/o. H.No. 6{142, KLB Colony, Pochampally, [Yadadri Bhongir ][District.]Fl/o. H.No. 6{142, KLB Colony, Pochampally, [Yadadri Bhongir ][District.]

44. Mada Swamy, S/o Nambi Kumar, Aged about 67 years, Occ. Labour, R/o.H.No. 1 1-12-1410, Warasiguda, Secunderabad.H.No. 1 1-12-1410, Warasiguda, Secunderabad.

45. Srigadi Shakuntala, Wo. Sambaiah, Aged about 70 years, Occ. Housewife,R/o H.No. 5-7216, Jagatgirigutta, MedChal Ma|kajgiri-District.R/o H.No. 5-7216, Jagatgirigutta, MedChal Ma|kajgiri-District.

(Respondents No.5 to 45 are impleaded as per C.O. dated 08/08/2024 in lANo.5 of 2022)

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue an Order, Direction or Writ, more particularly a Writ ofMandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in issuing impugnedpanchanama Dt 1210112022 in favour of the Respondent No.4 in respect of theland admeasuring Ac 6-00 gts in Sy.No. 46 of Meerpet Village, Balapur Mandal,R.R. District as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary and contrary to law and contraryto B.S.O. 21 and the Judgments of this Honble Court and set aside the impugnedpanchanama Dl. 12.01 .2022. Certiorari calling for all the connected recordsincluding the impugned panchanama Dt.12lO1 12022

(Prayer is amended as per C.O. dated 18.10.2022 in tA No.Zl2022)

Petition under Section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tosuspend the impugned panchanama Dl.12l01l2OZ2 issued by the respondentno.3 in favour of the respondent no.4, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

lA NO: 3 OF 2022

:

Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased toreceive the additional documents i.e, (1). Receipt Dt. 14.02.2022, (2). Notice Dt.15.06.2022, (3). Representation Dt.'10.02.2022, (4).Form No.1 (Comptaint)Ot.1 4.02.2022, (5 ).Tax Receipts, (6 ). Representation Dt. 1 O.O2.2O2Z to the DistrictCollector and (7). Represent ation D1.23.1 2.201 S.

lA NO:4 OF 2022

BETWEEN:

The Rickshaw Pullers and Daily Waged Workers Association, Rep. by itsPresident N. Mysaiah, Rep. by GPA Holder S.Sree Harsha, S/o. Tulai Das,Aged.37 years, Occ. Business, R/o. 't7-1-388/8i1, Laxminagar, SaidabadColony, Hyderabad

AND

...PETITIONEFURESPONDENT No.4

1. Dasari Bhaskar, Sio. Narsimha, Aged. 28 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.H.No. 1 7-29'l11, SirlaHitla, /eerpet. Bilapurtr4an'dat, R R. Oistri&H.No. 1 7-29'l11, SirlaHitla, /eerpet. Bilapurtr4an'dat, R R. Oistri&

2 pqqari._N^q,r9r.ryh_a, SlO.D,-Balaiah, Age 60 years, Occ. Agricutture, R/o.H.No.17-29111, SirlaHilla, Meerpet, BalSpurMandal, R.R. OistridtH.No.17-29111, SirlaHilla, Meerpet, BalSpurMandal, R.R. Oistridt 3 '1 9?9r.n Babu, 14, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, Ranga Reddy district.S/o. D. Balaiah,_Age 51 years, Occ. Agricuflure, R/o.H.No.j_

4. Dasari. . Pochaiah, S/o.DasariBalajah, Age 46 years, Occ. Agriculture,Rl/o.H.No.1-137, Meerpet, BalapurManiial, Ranga Reddy Disirict.Rl/o.H.No.1-137, Meerpet, BalapurManiial, Ranga Reddy Disirict.

5. Dasari.. Mglqmryq, Wo.D.Sammaiah, Age 45 years, Occ. Agriculture,R/o H.No.1-134, Meerpet, BatapurMand'at, Ranga R6ddt Disari;i.R/o H.No.1-134, Meerpet, BatapurMand'at, Ranga R6ddt Disari;i.

6. Dasari Sqarypa, Wo.D.Jangaiah. Age 43 years, Occ. Agriculture, Ri/o..1_133,Meerpet, BalapurMandal, Ra nga Red-dy Disirict.Meerpet, BalapurMandal, Ra nga Red-dy Disirict.

Z. P?.gtV. Puttammq, W/o.D.Shankaraiah, Age 63 years, Occ. Aqriculqure.Rl/o.H.No.'1-141, Meerpet, BatapurMandat, R;nga RdCdy Disarict.Rl/o.H.No.'1-141, Meerpet, BatapurMandat, R;nga RdCdy Disarict.

Disarict.A Pg:u1 Jangaiah,. S/o.DasariAdivaiah,-Age 40 years, Occ. Agrictiture Ri/o.1_139, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, Ranga Re-ddy Didtrict.139, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, Ranga Re-ddy Didtrict.

9. Dasari Narsimha, S/o.D.Pochaiah, Age S.l years, Occ. Aqriculture.Rl/o. H. No. 1 -1 2511, [\/eerpet, BalapurMandil, Ranga'Redciy Oiitrict.Rl/o. H. No. 1 -1 2511, [\/eerpet, BalapurMandil, Ranga'Redciy Oiitrict.

'l0.Dasari Balraj, S/o. Yellaiah, Age! 47 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. H.No..t_Balraj, S/o. Yellaiah, Age! 47 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. H.No..t_136, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. Distiict 'll.Dasari H.No. 1 -1 Su9h.akar, 35, Meerpet, BalapurMandalIR. S/o. Pentaiah, 4Sgd. R. 40 Oistrict.years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.H.No. 1 -1 Su9h.akar, 35, Meerpet, BalapurMandalIR. S/o. Pentaiah, 4Sgd. R. 40 Oistrict.years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.

12. Dasari . Sammaiah, S/o.D.Pochaiah, Age 46 years,Occ. Agriculture,Rlo.H.No.1 -109, Meerpet, BatapurMandal,"R.n. Oistiict.Rlo.H.No.1 -109, Meerpet, BatapurMandal,"R.n. Oistiict.

13. Dasari Balvanth, S/o.Yellaiah, Age 40 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. H.No..l-137,Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. D-istrict.-Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. D-istrict.- ta Q[trg1 Ramulu, S/o.Muthaiah, Age 76 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.H.No.1_137, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. District.137, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. District.

15. Rl/o. Bommani H. No.'1 . -1 \qr_sir.n-ha, 00, Meerpet, BalapurMandat, R:R. S/o3.. Jangaiah, 4g. District.74 years, Occ. agriculture,16. Bommari ^ [T-ula_saiah, ][S/o.B.pochaiah, ]_{Oe [SO ][years, Occ. ][Agriculture,]16. Bommari ^ [T-ula_saiah, ][S/o.B.pochaiah, ]_{Oe [SO ][years, Occ. ][Agriculture,]R/o.H.No.2-8, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. District.

'17. R/o. Bomma.ni H. No.2-1, Meerpet, BalapurMandal, ^ Narsamma, _Wo.B.Yadaiah, R. {ge R: District:a9 years, Occ. Agriculture,

18. B.ommani Jagan,.S/o. Pochaiah, Age 47 yearc, Occ. Agriculture, H.No.1-97,Meerpet, Balapurl\rlandal, R.R. District.Meerpet, Balapurl\rlandal, R.R. District.

'l9.Bommani Babamma, Wo Yadaiah, Age 58 years, occ. Agricuture, R:/o..1-104,Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. District.Meerpet, BalapurMandal, R.R. District.

20. Bomma.ni lq1rya-ryma, Wo.B. Shankaraiah, Age 60 years, Occ. Agricutture,R/o.H.No.1-102, lVleerpet, BalapurMandat, R.R."Districi.R/o.H.No.1-102, lVleerpet, BalapurMandat, R.R."Districi.

...WRIT PETITIONERS/RESPONDE NTS

21 . The State of Telangana, Represented by its principal Secretary, RevenueDepartment, Secretariat Buiidings, Hydeirabad.Department, Secretariat Buiidings, Hydeirabad.

22. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District.

. [23.The Tahsildar, BalapurMandal, ][Ranga ][Reddy ][District.]

.,.RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavrt filed in support of the petition, irre Hign court may be pleased tovacate the interim order dated 1811012022 passed in w.p.No,378io ot iozz.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRt R. PRASHANTH REPRESENTING FORSRI V. YADU KRISHNA SAINATH

counsel forthe Respondent No.1: sRr L. RAVTNDER, ASST. cp FoR REVENUE

Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SMT. RACHANA REDDY, SR. COUNSELREP FOR SRI MOHD. BASHEER RIYAZREP FOR SRI MOHD. BASHEER RIYAZ

Counsel forthe Respondent No.S: M/s. S. TULASI DAS

Counsel for the Respondent No.6 to 25 & 27 to 45: SRI p. SHASHI KIRANThe Court made the following: COMMON ORDERThe Court made the following: COMMON ORDER

I

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

WRIT PETITION Nos.58O1 and 3782O OF 2022COMMON ORDER:

Heard Sri R. Prashanth, learned counselrepresenting Sri Vemula Yadu Krishna Sainath, learnedcounsel for the petitioners, Smt. Rachana Reddy, learnedsenior counsel representing Sri Mohd. Basheer Riyaz,iearned counsel for respondent No.4 and Sri S. TrrlasiDas, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.6 to25 and 27 to 45 in W.P.No.37820 of 2022 andSri L. Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pieader forRevenue. Perused the record.

2. The lis involved in both the writ petitions andsubject property is one and the same. Therefore, both thewrit petitions were heard together and decided by way ofthis common order. The official respondents are referredto as arrayed in W.P.No.580 1 of 2022. Respondent Nos. 6

to 25 and 27 to 45 are referred as members of respondentNo.4 Association.

3. Petitioners are (2g) in number. They belong toScheduled Caste community. Their forefathers and aftertheir death, their fathers and thereafter, petitioners are inpossession of land admeasuring Ac.6.OO gts. in Sy.No.46situated at Meerpet Village of Balapur Mandal, RangaReddy District. They are in possession of the subject landsince last 10 decades.

4. In the year 1973, some of their family membersobtained loan from Dena Bank, Saroornagar Branch fordevelopment of the said tand. They are cultivating thesaid land. They have also obtained electricity connectionand paying consumption charges to the ElectricityDepartment. Thus, they claim ttrat they are in possessionof the subject property.

5. In the year 1998, respondent Nos. 1 to 3 tried todispossess the family members of petitioners along withfamily members of Bommana family. Therefore, they havefi,ed a writ petition vide w.p.No.31559 of 199g. videorder dated 13.06.1999, this Court referring to the order dated 02.01.1997 in W.P.No.3583l of 1997 disposed ofthe said writ petition directing the respondents thereinnot to demolish the structures nor to dispossess thepetitioners therein from the land to an extent of Ac.6.0Ogts. situated in Sy.No.46 of Meerpet Village, SaroornagarManda,l, without foilowing due process laid down underlaw.6. The respondent authorities in view of the aforesaidorders passed by this Court, conducted [panchananama']dated 12.01.2022 and delivered [possession ]of [subject]property to respondent No.4 Association. Challenging thesaid impugned panchamarna issued in favour [of]respondent No.4 Association, petitioners in W.P.No.37820of 2022 filed the said writ petition. Thereafter, [respondent]No.4 Association a-lso filed a suit vide O.S.No.304 [of ]2022against some of the [petitioners ]seeking [perpetual]injunction. Along with the suit,anInterlocutoryApplication vide LA.No.33 of 2022 seeking ad-interiminjunction was fiIed. Vide order dated [09.O5.2022,]

learned Special JFCM, Excise_cum_Vll Addl. Junior CivilJudge-cum-Vll Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate atL.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District dismissed the said I.A.Feeling aggrieved by the sarne, respondent No.4Association preferred an Appear vide C.M.A.No.3S of2022. The same was also dismissed. The said ordersattained finality.

7. On 2g.O1.2O22, staff of respondent Nos. 1 to 3requested the petitioners to vacate the schedule landwithout issuing any notice and without following dueprocedure laid down under law. Respondent Nos. 1 to 3informed the petitioners that the subject property belongsto Government ald therefore, petitioners have to vacatefrom the subject property within one week. petitionershave furnished copy of order dated 13.06.1999 inW.P.No.31559 of l99g to the stalT of respondent Nos. 1to 3. They have not considered the same. Thus, the entireaction of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in trying to vacate thepetitioners from the subject land without following due procedure laid down under law is arbitraqr, illegal andalso in violation of [. ]order dated 13.06.1999 inW.P.No.31559 of 1998. Challenging the said action ofrespondents, petitioners in W.P.No.5801 of 2022 filed thesaid writ petition.

8. Respondent No.4 contended that he is working asPresident of Ranga Reddy District Rickshaw Pullers andDaily Waged Workers Welfare Association, a registeredAssociation. The said Association is formed for thewelfare and rehabilitation of its members, who areRickshaw pullers. They have a,lso succeeded in securingthe assignments with regard to land in Jagatgirigutta inthe year 198 1, Kachwani Singaram in the year 1985 andMeerpet in the year 1993. Thus, the said Association isfighting for the wellare of its members who are Rickshawpullers.

9. The said Association succeeded in getting pattacertificates in respect of Meerpet land in the year 1993.But due to some obstruction caused by local people, the /

members of the said association were not in a position totake possession of the said property. Thus, there wasdelay. Therefore, they have filed a writ petition videdelay. Therefore, they have filed a writ petition videW.P.No.27974 of I99g and the sarne was disposed of on09.02.2001.09.02.2001.

10. A housing layout was prepared by the then HUDAfor tota_l extent of Ac.22.25 gts. in Sy.No.46 of Meerpet.Members of the said Association numbering about 23Ohave to be allotted the plots, but due to encroachmentsmade by Toddy Tappers, Washer man community and forBuria_l ground, the.y lost 100 plots. About 15O assigneeswere actually shown physical possession leaving gOassignees to their fate. In the year 2006, Government hasissued G.O.Ms.No.493, dated 2g.O4.2006 banningallotments of individual house plots and carne out with arevised policy to accommodate the houseless people inthe Rajiv Gruhakalpa and other similar housing schemes.Therefore, the members of the said Association had nooption but to act as silent spectators.

11. Thereafter, a writ petition vide W.P (PIL) No.249 of2017 was filed assailing the said G.O and the Circularinstructions issued by the then Collector, Ranga ReddyDistrict, cancelling all the assignments made prior to2006. Vide order dated 30.10.20 18, a Division Bencha-llowed the said writ petition and set aside the saidproceedings. They have not initiated further action incompliance with the said orders. Therefore, they haveIiled a contemptCASC. They have also approachedLokay'uktha. Thereafter, the Tahsildar, Balapur Ma-ndalconducted physical verification of the area and submittedreport to the District Collector on 08. 12.2O16. Copy of thesarne was forwarded to the Lokal'uktha. Vide order dated21.O9.2O2O, Lokayrrktha directed the authorities toinduct the members of the association physically withinone month from the date of report. The Tahsildar vidememo dated 30.06.2O2L, directed the Manda-l Surveyorand the Additional Mandal Girdavar, Balapur to inspectthe subject land situated in Sy.No.46 of Meerpet withreference to layout by the HUDA and report compliance (

for taking necessary action in the matter. Thereafter, theTahsildar vide letter dated l1.ll.2o2l requested theStation House Oflicer, Meerpet police station to providepolice protection to the staff and the beneficiaries in theprocess of plotting and delivering possession and whenthe Revenue Inspector faced hardship, he sought the helpof police, who in turn gave assistance to thern indelivering possession on 12.O1.2022. Thus, the membersof the said Association took possession and started layingthe roads, drainage pipeline and other structures over anextent of Ac. 1.2O gts. They agreed to forego 35 plots outof 8O plots so as to accommodate the writ petitioners. Infact none of the writ petitioners are entitled for anyallotment whatsoever under the revision videG.O.Ms.No.493 of 2006, dated 28.O4.2006.

L2. The Government has to either modifu G.O. or seekan amendment to allot the plots to the writ petitioners.Therefore, the present writ petition is not maintainable.They have hled the present writ petition with a mala hde

intention. A case in Crime No.60 of 2022 under Sections447, 427 rlw.34 of IpC was registered by p.S.Meerpetagainst the writ petitioners. They were arrested andenlarged on bail. Thus, with the said contentions,respondent No.4 sought to dismiss the present writpetition.

13. The aforestated facts would reveal that thepetitioners are claiming right over land admeasuringAc.6.00 gts. in Sy.No.46 of Meerpet Village, BalapurMandal, Ranga Reddy District. According to them, theirforefathers, their fathers and thereafter, petitioners are inpossession of the said property. When respondent Nos. 1to 3 tried to dispossess their family.members and others,they have filed a writ petition vide W.p.No.3iS59 of 199gand this Court vide order dated 13.06.1999 referring tothe order dated O2.01 .1992 in W.p.No.35g3l of l99Tdirected the respondents not to dispossess the petitionerstherein and not to demolish the structures in the subjectproperfy i.e. in the land to an extent of Ac.6.0O gts.

situated in Sy.No.46 of Meerpet Village, SaroornagarMandal, without following due process laid down under1au,.

L4. It is relevant to note that in the said order, thisCourt referred the order dated O2.Ol.lg97 inW.P.No.35831 of L997. Vide the said order datedO2.O1.L997 in W.P.No.3S831 of 1997, this Court heldthat the property of the petitioners situated in Sy.No.45,admeasuring Ac.1.10 cents situated at Mansoorabad,Saroornagar Manda_l, Ranga Reddy District shall not beinterfered with by respondent No.4 nor he should takeany action to demolish the structures without takingrecourse to law and without putting the petitionerstherein on notice.

15. Petitioners filed photographs to show that they dugbore well and they have obtained electricity connection.16. Perusa-l of documents filed by respondent No.4would revea-l that Ralga Reddy District Rickshaw pullers and Daily Waged Workers Welfare Association,represented by its president filed a writ petition videW.P.No.27974 of 1998 to declare the action ofrespondents therein in not handing over physicatpossession to the patta holders in Sy.No .46 of MeerpetVillage, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, asillegal. Vide order dated 09.O2.2OO1, this Court disposedof the said writ petition directing the respondents thereinto take all necessar5r steps and see that no constructionis made by any unauthorized person in the land allottedto the beneficiaries. No construction shall be allowed tobe made in open space. The respondents sha_ll also takenecessary steps to prevent the encroachments into theland, which is already allotted to the beneliciaries andweaker sections of the societSr.

17. This Court also observed that the Mandal RevenueOfficer shall scrutintze each of the patta certificate earliergranted and upon being satisfied about the identity of the patta holders, [ind,uct each ][one ][of ][them ][into ][possession of]the lald [a,llotted ][to the ][particular pattadar' ][etc']

18. Vide order [dated ][3O'i0'2018 ][in ][W'P'(PIL) ][No'249]of 2Ol7 and [batch, ][filed ][by ][the ][Weaker ][Sections ][Welfare]Association [(Regd.No.2447l ][and' ][6 ][others' ][this ][Court ][set]aside the [proceedings ][dated ][28'03'2007 ][and ][granted]to [the ][Revenue ][authorities ][to ][examine ][individual]tiberty cases and' if [circumstances ][warrant, ][issue notice, ][afford]opportunity [to ][beneficiaries ][and pass orders']

19. Proceedings [No.E4/253O/05, ][dated ][28'O3'2OO7]were issued [consequent]to G.O.Ms.No.493, [dated]28.04.2006. [The ][same ][is ][relevant ][and extracted ][below']" Therefore, [for the ][above ][said reasons and ][in]of [Government ][on]view of thepresent PolicY of individual [house ][site ][Pattas ][in]assignmentRanga Reddy [District as ][stipulated ][in ][reference]10th cited. [above, ][all the ][patta ][certificates]prepared before [28'04'2006, ][but not ][distributed]which wereand all the Patta [certificates]distributed but Possession [not]given before2A.04.2006 [are ][herebY ][cancelled']

The Mandal Revenue Officers concerned arehereby directed to take necessary action forregistration of the eligible beneficiaries underUnion Poor Housing Schernes where pattecertificates were prepared, but not distributedand to those patte certificates distributed, butpossession not given and report compiiance.,,

20. Vide Memo dated 3O.06.2021, respondent No. 1referring to the orders passed by Lokayuktha, clirectedthe Mandal Surveyor and the Additional Manda,lGirdawar, Balapur to inspect the subject land situated inSy.No.46 of Meerpet with reference to the layout approvedby HUDA and to send compliance report for takingfurther necessary action in the matter. Vide proceedingsdated 01.11.2O2i., respondent No. 1 directed AdditionalMandal Girdawar, Balapur Mandal to redevelop/makenecessary changes/put land situated in Sy.No.46 ofMeerpet Village, Balapur Mandal in the style and shapeof layout for taking further necessa_ry action in the matteras directed by Lokayuktha. Vide Memo dated 1O.01 .2022,respondent No.1 directed the Additional Mandal Girdawar, Balapur Mandal [to ][handover ][the ][possession ][of]the (a5) redeveloped [plots ]situated [at ][Sy.No.46 of Meerpet]Village, Balapur Mandal1nfavour of members ofrespondent No.4-The District Rickshaw [Pullers and ][Daily]Waged Workers Association under cover [of ][panchanama.]Vide letter dated 15.I1.2021, respondent [No.l-Tahsildar]sought for police protection [from PS, ][Meerpet.]Accordingly, panchanarna was conducted [on ][L2.O1.2O22]and handed over the plots to the [members of respondent]No.4 Association.

2L. Referring to the Board Standing [Orders ][21, ][learned]counsel for the petitioners in [W.P.No.3782O ][of ][2022]would submit that no application [for ][assignment ][or ][sale]of Government land under the [Standing ][Orders ][to ][a]association unless [such company, ][association]company, or societ5r is a company within [the ][meaning ][of ][that ][word]in Section 3(1) of the Companies [Act, ][i956 ][or ][has ][been]registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, theReligious Societies Act, 1880, etc. Therefore, the contention of learned counsel for respondent no.4Association that iand was assigned to the saidAssociation is contrar5r to the said Board Standing.Orders 21 . He also placed reliance on the principles laiddown in Lance Naik Korrapati Kishore Kumar v. TheState of Andhra Pradesh and othersr and IndianImmunologicals v. Narendra Agarwal and othersz.

Arguments

22. Learned counsel for the petitioners also wouldcontend that while conducting panchanama on12.O1.2022, respondent No. 1 did not put the petitionersin W.P.No.3782O of 2022 on notice. Whereas, learnedcounsel appearing for respondents and learned AssistantGovernment Pleader for Revenue would contend that thefamily members of the petitioners were present and thesarne was recorded in the said panchanama.

23. Respondent No.4 Association lodged a complaintdated 19.01.2022 with P.S., Meerpet, who in turnregistered a case in Crime No. 60 of 2022 agatnst' [zozz ]1t1 [eto ]u' [zozz ]1t1 [eto ][et+]

Mr. Kishore and others [for ][the ][offences ][under ][Sections]447,427 rlw.34 of [IPC.]

24. Perusal of record [a-lso ][would ][reveal ][that ][respondent]No.4 Association filed a suit [vide ][o.S.No.3O4 ][of ][2022]against some of the [petitioners seeking ][perpetual]injunction. Vide order dated [09.05.2022 ][irt ][I.A.No.33 ][of]2022 in O.S.No.3O4 of [2022, ][learned ][Special ][JFCM,]Excise-cum-Vll Addl. Junior [Civil ][Judge-cum-Vll ][Addl.]Metropolitan Magistrate at [L.B.Nagar, ][Ranga ][Reddy]District dismissed the said I.A [hled ][for ][ad-interim]injunction. Feeling aggrieved [by ][the ][same, ][respondent]No.4 Association preferred [an ][Appeal ][vide ][C.M.A.No.35 ][of]2022. The sarne was [also ][dismissed.]

21o. The aforestated facts [would ][reveal ][that ][both ][the]petitioners and members of the aforesaid [Association ][are]claiming right over the subject [property. ][There are ][three]aforesaid orders with respect to subject [property]1. e.1) order dated 13.06.1999 in W.P.No.31559 of 1998,2) order dated 09.02.2001 in W.P.No.27974 of 1998 and

3) order dated 30.10.2018 in W.p (pIL) No.249 of 2Ot7and batch.

26. Vide aforesaid order dated 30.10.2018 in W.p (pIL)No.249 of 2017 and batch, a Division Bench grantedliberty to the Revenue authorities to examine individualcases and if circumstances wa_rrant, issue notice, affordopportunity to beneficiaries and pass orders. It appearsthat respondent Nos. l to 3 conducted panchanama dated12.OI.2O22 and delivered possession of the plots in anextent of Ac. 1.20 gts. to the members of the aforesaidrespondent No.4 Association. petitioners herein are alsoclaiming that they a-re the absolute owners andpossessors of land admeasuring Ac.6.0O gts. in Sy.No.46situated at Meerpet Village, Balapur Mandal, RangaReddy District. Vide order dated 13.06.1999 inW.P.No.31559 of i99g, this Court directed respondentNos. 1 to 3 not to dispossess the family members ofpetitioners from the subject property. Thus, dispute iswith regard to land in Sy.No.46 of Meerpet Village. The dispute is going on since 1998. Both petitioners andmembers of the aforesaid association are claiming rightover the subject property and that they are in possessionof the said property. The extent is different.

27. In the light of the aforesaid discussion, both the writpetitions are disposed of directing the District Collector,Ranga Reddy District, the Tahsildar, Balapur Mandal,respondent Nos.2 and 3 in W.P. No.37820 of 2022, toinspect the site, examine the entire record including theaforesaid three orders; Board Standing Order No.21 andtake action in accordance with procedure laid downunder law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, withina period of three (3) months from the date of receipt ofcopy of this order. In the circumstances of the case, thereshall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if arry,pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.

SD/.T.[TIRUMALA ][DEVI]ASST REGISTRAR//TRUE [COPY//]cTlo[N][OFFICER]

To,1.The Prinicipal [Secretary' ][Revenue Department' ][The ][State of ][Telangana']Secretariate, [HYderaoao']

234. l[,ii{.i1{tlt'1",ii1ffi3fl [fl1h[,u"Ii:s3ft?'3',Bi:'ff&ansaReddv]District.34.l[,ii{.i1{tlt'1",ii1ffi3fl [fl1h[,u"Ii:s3ft?'3',Bi:'ff&ansaReddv]District.

\

5. One CC to SRI V. YADU KRISHNA SAINATH, Advocate IOPUC]

6. One CC to M/s. TULASI DAS, Advocate IOPUC]

IOPUC]7. One CC to SRI MOHD. BASHEER RIYAZ, Advocate [OPUC]

B. One CC to SRI P. SHASHI KIRAN, Advocate [OPUC]

9. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telanganatourltourl 'l0.Two CD Copies BN

BNLSv

II

HIGH COURT

DATED:31 11212024

1 $E [STAI]c.G,\6'q(o2[ [Jril ][z$fi]\3\i)

COOMON ORDERWP.Nos.5801 & 37820 o12022

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITIONWITHOUT COSTS

@W

t