Telangana High Court
WP/28318/2007 of B.Ayyanna Vs The Joint Collector, Kurnool, Kurnool District on 31 December 2007
SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.28318 OF 2007 Date: 31-12-2007 Between: B.Ayyanna … Petitioner And 1. The Joint Collector, Kurnool and others … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.28318 OF 2007 O R D E R: Heard both the
Date:31-12-2007
Between:
B.Ayyanna … Petitioner
And
1. The Joint Collector,
Kurnool and others … Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
WRIT PETITION NO.28318 OF 2007
Heard both the counsel.
2. The writ petition is filed praying for a Writ of Mandamus, declaring theaction of the 2[nd] respondent in not passing any orders despite the 1[st]respondent remanded back the matter vide proceedings Rc.CS.3/54/2006,dated 8.3.2007 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, improper and consequently directthe 2[nd] respondent to pass orders pursuant to the proceedingsRc.CS.3/54/2006 dated 8.3.2007 of the 1[st] respondent and for such otherreliefs.
3. The main grievance of the petitioner as can be seen from the affidavitfiled in support of the application is that the second respondent is not passingany order, despite the first respondent remanding back the matter. In view ofthe facts and circumstances, the second respondent is directed to dispose ofthe matter within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy ofthe order.
4. The writ petition is, accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs.
31[st] December, 2007.
_________________
P.S.NARAYANA,J
Date: 31-12-2007