Telangana High Court
WP/3227/2001 of M/s. Sree Raja Rajeswari Paper Mills Ltd., Vs The Dy. Commissioner of Labour, on 24 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WPMP NO.36676 OF 2008 AND WRIT PETITION Nos.3227 of 2001 Between: M/s.Sree Raja
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE,ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OFDECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY
PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNAREDDY
WPMP NO.36676 OF 2008ANDWRIT PETITION Nos.3227 of 2001
Between:M/s.Sree Raja Rajeswari Paper Mills Ltd.,Bapulapadu, Near Hanuman Junction,Krishna District, reptd., by its Chairman-Sri V.C.Janardan Rao.
… Petitioner
AndThe Dy. Commissioner of Labour,Eluru Zone, Eluru, West Godavari District andtwo others.
… Respondents
Counsel for the petitioners : Sri V.Hari Haran Counsel for respondents : Sri V.Raghu for R.2.
None for R.1 and R.3.
This Court made the following:-ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for the followingsubstantive relief:
“…to issue a writ, order or direction, more in thenature of writ of certiorari calling for the records infile No.B/2599/2000, dt.24-10-2000 on the file of the1[st] respondent-Dy.Commissioner of Labour, Zone-II,Eluru, W.G.Dist., and quash the same as beingpassed without authority of law, illegal and unjustifiedand without reasonable opportunity of hearing andhence suffers from the vice of Art.14 of Constitutionof India”.
The petitioner filed WPMP No.36676 of 2008 withthe prayer to dispose of the Writ Petition in terms ofmemorandum of settlement dated Nil-11-2008. I haveperused the joint memo filed on behalf of the petitionerand respondent No.2-workmen, signed by the partiesand their respective counsel, and also thememorandum of settlement entered into between theparties.
At the hearing, Sri V.Hari Haran, learned counselfor the petitioner and Sri V.Raghu, learned counsel forrespondents No.2, submitted that the Writ Petition maybe disposed of in accordance with the said settlement.
In view of this submission of the learned counsel for theparties, the Writ Petition is disposed of in terms ofsettlement dated Nil-11-2008 with the direction that thesaid settlement shall form part of the record of this WritPetition.
As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP
No.4116 of 2001 and WVMP No.918 of 2003 aredisposed of as infructuous.
Date:24.12.2008MNR
__________________________
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J