Telangana High Court

WP/26344/2005 of M/s. Akula Koteswara Rao, AND Son Jewellers, Vs The Commercial Tax Officer, on 26 December 2005

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No. 26344 OF 2005 26-12-2005 Between: M/s.Akula Koteswara Rao & Son, Jewellers, Brodipet, Guntur, rep. by its Proprietor. ………Petitioner And The Commercial Tax Officer,

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI

AND

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU

WRIT PETITION No. 26344 OF 2005

26-12-2005

Between:

M/s.Akula Koteswara Rao & Son, Jewellers, Brodipet,Guntur, rep. by its Proprietor.

And

………Petitioner

The Commercial Tax Officer, Narasaraopet Circle, Guntur & Others.

……..Respondents

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI

AND

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU

WRIT PETITION No. 26344 OF 2005

ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Bilal Nazki, J)

Counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner’s grievancehas already been redressed. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed.No order as to costs.

26[th] December 2005

________________

(BILAL NAZKI, J)

ajr

________________

(C.V. RAMULU, J)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead