Telangana High Court

WP/16517/2009 of G.V.Ravindra Kumar, Vs The Superintendent of Police, on 31 December 2014

SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.16517 of 2009 ORDER: Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. This writ petition is filed declaring the action of respondents 2 and 3 in harassing the petitioner and his family

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAOWRIT PETITION No.16517 of 2009

ORDER:

Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learnedGovernment Pleader for the respondents.

This writ petition is filed declaring the action of respondents 2 and3 in harassing the petitioner and his family members to settle the disputewith respondents 4 to 6 and to register the property in favour of the 4[th]respondent and to withdraw the case pending against respondents 4 to 6as illegal and arbitrary.

Learned Government Pleader, on instructions, states that policeneither interfered with the civil dispute nor harassed the petitioner at anypoint of time. The other allegations made by the petitioner are alsodenied.

In view of the same, no further orders are necessary in thepresent Writ Petition and the same is accordingly dismissed asinfructuous. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall standclosed. There shall be no order as to costs.

_____________________________

(A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J)

31.12.2014

Prv

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead