Telangana High Court
WP/27597/2007 of Ketha Thirupalu Reddy , Thirupal Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the on 28 December 2007
SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH W.P.Nos.21428 and 27597 of 2007 Between: Rapuru Rami Reddy and others. .. PETITIONERS and The Government of A.P. and others. .. RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH W.P.Nos.21428 and 27597 of 2007 COMMON ORDER: Since similar questions that arise
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH
W.P.Nos.21428 and 27597 of 2007
Between:
Rapuru Rami Reddy and others.
.. PETITIONERS
and
The Government of A.P. and others.
.. RESPONDENTS
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH
W.P.Nos.21428 and 27597 of 2007
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON ORDER:
Since similar questions that arise for consideration in these writpetitions, the same are taken up together for disposal by way of commonorder.
The petitioners in W.P.No.21428 of 2007 are in possession andenjoyment of the lands admeasuring Ac.0-52 cents in Sy.No.1078, Ac.0-52cents in Sy.No.1078 and Ac.4-00 cents in Sy.No.1056-P respectively situatedat Devarayapalli Bit-I, Anantha Sagaram Mandal, Nellore District, and thepetitioner in W.P.No.27597 of 2007 is in possession and enjoyment of theland admeasuring Ac.3-50 cents in Sy.No.1056-P situated at Devarayalli Bit-I, Anantha Sagaram Mandal, Nellore District, having acquired through D.K.T.pattas.
It is stated that in case of petitioners in W.P.No.21428 of 2007, theirnames were entered in the adangals and in case of petitioner inW.P.N.27597 of 2007, pattadar pass book has been issued in his favour. While so, the respondents are attempting to dispossess the petitioners fromthe lands in question, without following due process of law and withoutissuing any notice.
It is further stated that they have not violated any terms and conditionsof D.K.T. pattas and even if there is any violation, the petitioners cannot bedispossessed from the lands in question without following due process oflaw.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the writpetitions are disposed of directing the respondents not to dispossess thepetitioners from the lands in question without following due process of law.There shall be no order as to costs.
___________