Telangana High Court

WP/4544/2000 of Jetti Sudhakar Vs Transmission Corporation , on 31 December 2008

COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:4544 of 2000 Between: Jetti Sudhakar ..... PETITIONER AND The AP Transmission

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY

WRIT PETITION NO:4544of2000

Between:

Jetti Sudhakar

AND

..... PETITIONER

The AP Transmission Corporation and others

.....RESPONDENTS

Counsel for the Petitioner:MR. P.RAGHAVENDER REDDY

Counsel for the respondents:MR. P.R.BALARAMI REDDY

The Court made the following :

ORDER:

This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to direct therespondents to absorb the petitioner on permanent basis in any suitablepost in terms of B.P.Ms.No.36, dated 18.05.1997.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P.R.Balarami Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

The grievance of the petitioner is that though he is working as acontract labourer under the individual contractors of the erstwhileAndhra Pradesh State Electricity Board, his case has not beenconsidered for absorption under B.P.Ms.No.36, dated 18.05.1997.

No counter-affidavit is filed by the respondents controverting theaverments contained in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition.

Page 1 of 2

Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction torespondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider the case of the petitioner forabsorption in terms of B.P.Ms.No.36, dated 18.05.1997, passappropriate order and communicate the same to the petitioner within aperiod of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.6037 of 2000filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous.

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J

31[st] DECEMBER, 2008.

kvni

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead