Telangana High Court
WP/43588/2016 of M. Nageswar Rao , Bullet Babu, Vs The State of Telangana Rep. by The Principal Secretary, on 29 December 2016
SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO WRIT PETITION No.43588 OF 2016 ORDER: The writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of mandamus to quash the proceedings in F.I.R.No.257 of 2016 on the file of the third respondent. Heard and perused the material. Learned counsel for the petitioner
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Arguments
ORDER:
The writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of mandamus to quash the proceedings in F.I.R.No.257 of 2016 on the file of the third respondent. Heard and perused the material.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the fourth respondent, with all false allegations, lodged a complaint against the petitioner and others and that a case is registered being F.I.R.No.257 of 2016 against the petitioner along with other accused for the offences under Sections 420, 272, 273, 109 read with Section 34 IPC. He further submits that on earlier occasion, this Court directed the petitioner herein to appear before the Investigating Officer concerned and in pursuance of the same, the petitioners appeared before the Investigating Officer and cooperated with the investigating agency. The same is also reiterated by the Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to quash the proceedings against the petitioner at the threshold. However, taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner already appeared before the investigation agency, the third respondent is directed to complete the further investigation without arresting the petitioner and file final report, if any, in accordance with law. The petitioner is directed to appear before the third respondent and execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) with one surety for the likesum for his future appearance as and when required for the purpose of investigation.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any shall also stand disposed of.
29.12.2016 pln
_____________________
JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO