CRLP/2213/2019 of Komma Suresh Vs The State of telangana on 29 December 2023

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court atHyderabad.Hyderabad.

.RESPONDENT

2. N. Ravinder, S/o. N. Jagna. Aged about 39 years, Occ. Private Employee R/o.'Plot No.281, Tirumala Nagar Almasguda, R. R. District.Plot No.281, Tirumala Nagar Almasguda, R. R. District.

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P.C [praying ]that in the circumstancesstated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court maybe pleased to quash the proceedings in Crime No.941/2018 registered by SHOVanasthalipuram Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2019

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C [praying ]that in the circumstancesstated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the [High Court ][may]bepleased td grant stay of all further proceedings including arrest of the [petition]accused No.2 in connection with Crime [No.941/2018 registered ][by ][SHO]Vanasthalipuram Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate. [pending ][disposa]of the above criminal petition.

:

".

-z-

CRL.P. NO.2213 0F 2019

Between:

Komma Suresh, [S/o. ][Sri ][Komma ][Ram ][Raieshwar, ][Aged ][about ][48 ][years, ][Occ.]Business, R/o. [H.No.6-5-439, ][MIG-ll, ][Phase ][-V, ][Self ][Finance ][Colony,]Vanasthalipuram, [R. ][R. District.]

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1

AND

1. The State of Telangana, [Rep. ]by its Public Prosecutor [High ][Court at]Hyderabad.Hyderabad.

..Respondent

2. N. Ravinder, S/o. [N. ][Jagna Aged about ][39 ][years, Occ. Private Employee ][Ri/o]Plot No.28'1, Tirumala [Nagar ]Almasguda, [R. R. ][Diskict.]Plot No.28'1, Tirumala [Nagar ]Almasguda, [R. R. ][Diskict.]

...RESPONDENT/COM PLAINANT

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C [praying ]that in the circumstancesstated in the Memorandum [of ][Grounds ][of ][Criminal Petition, ][the ][High Court may]be pleased to [quash ]the [proceedings ][in ][Crime ][No.941/2018 ][registered by ][SHO,]Vanasthalipuram Police Station, Rachakonda [Commissionerate..]

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2019

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P -C [praying ]that in the circumstances [,:,]stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of [Criminal Petition, ][the ][High ][Court ][may]bepleased to [grant ]stay of all [further ][proceedings against A-][1 ][in ]connection withCrime No.941/20'18 registered by SHO, [Vanqsthalipuram ][Police ][Station]Rachakonda Commissionerate [pending ]disposal [of ][the above criminal ][petition. ]['']

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon [perusing ]the fVemorandum of ".Grounds of Criminal [Petition ]and upon [hearing ]the arguments of Sri CHDHANAMJAYA, Advocate [for ]the [Petitioner in both the ]Criminal [Petitions ]and the [. ][.]Public Prosecutor on behalf of the [Respondent ][No.1 ]in both the Criminal [petitions.]

':ji'i'.

The Court made the following ORDER:

.i li.i,. E,.i8fills5ffi!,;ntl1'gitjbftAe*Eia..i*rir&tffi{EtrJ*',*ffit.,+''l-*1r,'.+... tl;-i;i*i:.,,i:,., THE [HONOURABLE ][SRI JUSTICE K'SURENDER]CRIMINAL[ PET][ITIO][N ][Nos.][ 1757 ][at][d,22L3][ o][F ][2019]coM[MON][o][RDER:]

These [Criminal ][Petitions ][are ][filed ][under ][Section ][482]oftheCodeofCriminalProcedure(forshortCr.P.C.}bythe [petitioners/accused ][Nos'1 ][and ][2 to ][quash ][the]proceedings [against ][them ][in ][FIR No'941 ][of ][2018 ][on ][the]IileoftheP.S.,Vanasthalipuram'Rachakonda'registeredfor the [offences ][punishable ][under ][Sections ][420' ][506 ][and]509 of [Indian ][Penal ][Code ][and ][Section ][3(2)(va) ][of ][the]Scheduled [Castes ][and the ][Scheduled ][Tribes ][(Prevention]of Atrocities) [Act, ][20 ][15']

Since [[the petitioners ][are arrayed as ][accused ]][[are arrayed as ][accused ]][[accused ]][[Nos'1]]

2. Since [[the petitioners ][are arrayed as ][accused ]][[are arrayed as ][accused ]][[accused ]][[Nos'1]]and 2 [inthe ][very ][same ][crime ][i'e' ][FIR ][No'941 ][of ][2018 ][and]both of [them ][sought ][to ][quash ][the ][said ][proceedings]agarnst [them, ][both the ][petitions ][are heard together ][and]disposed [off ][by way ][of ][common order']

The [[petitioners ][/ ][wife ][and ][husband are ][questioning]][[/ ][wife ][and ][husband are ][questioning]][[wife ][and ][husband are ][questioning]][[and ][husband are ][questioning]][[husband are ][questioning]][[questioning]]

3. The [[petitioners ][/ ][wife ][and ][husband are ][questioning]][[/ ][wife ][and ][husband are ][questioning]][[wife ][and ][husband are ][questioning]][[and ][husband are ][questioning]][[husband are ][questioning]][[questioning]]the [crime ][which ][was ][registered ][on the file ][of]

Ill

Vanasthalipuram Police Station, on the [basis ][of ][a private]complaint which was referred for the [purpose ][of]investigation U.i, ttre Special Sessions Judge [for ][trial ][of]cases under SCs & STs [(POA) ]Act. The [learned ][Sessions]Judge on 03.11.2018 has [passed ][the ][following ][docket]order:

"Heard the counsel for the complainant. Perused the complaint, documents filed along withcomplaint and other material on record. This courtis of the opinion that the thorough investigation isrequired for [just ]conclusion. Hence referred thiscomplaint to the S.H.O Vanasthalipuram P.S.U/sec. 156(3) Cr.P.C for investigation and report.CaIl on 03.12.2018"

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit ttrat al afhdavit is not frled in accordance with theguidelines of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case ofPriganka Sriurrstaoa and another as. State of UttarPradesh and othersl. In accordance with the saidjudgment, the complainant ought to have approached theSHO and thereafter the Superintendent of Police, if ' [lzors; ][e ][scc ][zez]

aggrieved [by ][the action of the ][SHO ][for not taking ][action]on [the comPlaint']

The [[Hon'ble Supreme ][Court ][in ][Babu Venkatesh ][as']][[Court ][in ][Babu Venkatesh ][as']][[in ][Babu Venkatesh ][as']][[Babu Venkatesh ][as']][[as']]

5. The [[Hon'ble Supreme ][Court ][in ][Babu Venkatesh ][as']][[Court ][in ][Babu Venkatesh ][as']][[in ][Babu Venkatesh ][as']][[Babu Venkatesh ][as']][[as']]Stdte [Of ][Kcrrnatokc,z ][held ][that ][the ][concerned Court]referring [case ][for the ][purpose ][of ][investigation ][shall ][give]reasons [for ][the ][said ][referral']

As seen seen [[from ][the ][docket ][order' ]][[the ][docket ][order' ]][[docket ][order' ]][[order' ]][[no ][reasons ]][[reasons ]][[a-re ][glven]][[glven]]

6. As seen seen [[from ][the ][docket ][order' ]][[the ][docket ][order' ]][[docket ][order' ]][[order' ]][[no ][reasons ]][[reasons ]][[a-re ][glven]][[glven]]and [further ][it ][does ][not ][appear ][that ][the ][learned ][Sessions]Judge [has noted about ][the ][facts ][of ][the ][case' Since the]complaint [was ][not ][given ][earlier ][to ][police ][and ][also]a-fhdavit [was ][not ][filed while ][lodging ][the complaint' ][docket]order [is liable to ][be set aside']

Accordingly, [[both ][the Criminal ]][[the Criminal ]][[Petitions are ][allowed]][[allowed]]

7. Accordingly, [[both ][the Criminal ]][[the Criminal ]][[Petitions are ][allowed]][[allowed]]and the [proceedings ][against ][the ][petitioners ][- ][accused]Nos.l [and 2 ][in ][FIR ][No'941 ][of ][2018 ][on ][the ][hle of ][the P'S'']Rachakonda,areherebY [quashed']VanasthaliPuram,However, [this ][order ][will ][not ][preclude ][the ][complainant]

from prosecuting the petitioners by following the dueprocedure.procedure.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall nr.rlur-r-ax ANSART :ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,:

//TRUE COPY//

SECTN OFFICER

To,1The Vll Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad at Hayathnagar.2One CC to SRI. CH DHANAMJAYA Advocate [OPUC]1The Vll Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad at Hayathnagar.2One CC to SRI. CH DHANAMJAYA Advocate [OPUC]

JTwo CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of Telanaganat Hyderabad. [OPUC]at Hyderabad. [OPUC]4Two CD copies.cvkNSNS

HIGH COURT

DATED:2 [gt. ]tzoz,a

COMMON ORDER

CRLP.Nos.1757 &2213 of 2019

Both the Grl.Ps. are Allowed.

jP"2

.r 1 (l:-'r

.:i.iT:i;1.1,r,,i:

i

.:.