Telangana High Court
CC/273/2017 of MOHAMMAD KHAJA MOINUDDIN, WARANGAL DIST. AND 2 OTHERS Vs M. MOHANACHARY, WARANGAL DIST. on 29 December 2023
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 273 OF 2017 Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 Io Pleased to punish the
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 273 OF 2017
Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act1971 Io Pleased to punish the Respondent for violation of the HonbleCourt order willfully, dated 15-1 1-2016 in W.P.No.39244 of 2016.
Between:
1. lvlohammad Khaja Moinuddin., S/o Md. Galib, Age 54 Years, OccAgriculture, Rl/o H.No.1 ['1 ]-23-1239, L.B. Nagar, Warangal,Warangal District.Agriculture, Rl/o H.No.1 ['1 ]-23-1239, L.B. Nagar, Warangal,Warangal District.
2. Mohammad Yousufuddin,, S/o Md. Galib, Aged 51 years, OccAgriculture, R/o H.No.1 1 -23-566, Ramanthapur, WarangalWarangal dist.Agriculture, R/o H.No.1 1 -23-566, Ramanthapur, WarangalWarangal dist.3. Mohammad Arifuddin,, Sio Late Md. Ameenuddin, Age 40 [years,]Occ Agriculture, R/o H.No.9-4-134l1/5, Nadeem Colony,Mehadipatnam. Hyderabad.Occ Agriculture, R/o H.No.9-4-134l1/5, Nadeem Colony,Mehadipatnam. Hyderabad.
...PETITIONERS
AND
M. MOHANACHARY, The Tahsildar, Zafargadh Mandal, WarangalDistrict.
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. K NARSI REDDY(NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR REVENUE (TG)
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI [JUSTICE ][J. ][SREENTVAS ][RAO]CONTEMPT CASE [No][.273 ][of ][2017]
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The contempt case is [frled ][seeking ][to ][punish ][the]
under [Sections ][10 ][to ][12 ][of ][the ][Contempt ][of ][Courts]respondent Act, lg7 l, for [deliberate ][and willful ][disobedience ][in]implementing [the order ][passed ][by ][this ][Court ][in ][W'P'No'39244]of 2016, dated [15.11.2016]
No representation representation [[on ][behalf ][of the ][petitioners ]][[behalf ][of the ][petitioners ]][[of the ][petitioners ]][[petitioners ]][[in ]][[the]]
2. No representation representation [[on ][behalf ][of the ][petitioners ]][[behalf ][of the ][petitioners ]][[of the ][petitioners ]][[petitioners ]][[in ]][[the]]morning and afternoon [sessions. ][Heard learned ][Assistant]Government Pleader [for ][Revenue ][appearing ][on ][behalf ][of]respondent.
'This Court while Court while [[disposing ]][[the writ ]][[petition ]][[i'c ]]
'3. This Court while Court while [[disposing ]][[the writ ]][[petition ]][[i'c ]]W.P.No.39244 of 2016 [on ][15.11'2016, ][directed ][the ][4th.]respondent to consider [the application ][made ][by ][the petitioners]on 17.09.2016 [and ][pass necessary ][orders thereon' ][if ][the ][same]is still pending [consideration, ][in ][accordance ][with ][law' ][after]hearing the [petitioners and the ][aggrieved ][party, ][if ][any' ][as early]as possible, [preferably ][within ][a ][period ][of ][eight ][weeks ][from ][the]from the date [of receipt of ][a copy ][of ][this ][order']
{t
tit
4. Learned Assistant Government pleader basing on theGovernment pleader basing on the instructions submits that, the respondent complied with theorder passed by this Court in W.p.No.39244 of 2O16, dated15.11.2016.
In view of the above submission, no further adjudication 5rs required 6 ' Accordingry, the contempt case is crosed. However, the contempt case is crosed. However, contempt case is crosed. However, case is crosed. However, is crosed. However, crosed. However, thepetitioners are petitioners are granted liberty to avail the remedies as areavailable under law, if so advised.available under law, if so advised.
Accordingry, the contempt case is crosed. However, the contempt case is crosed. However, contempt case is crosed. However, case is crosed. However, is crosed. However, crosed. However, the Pending miscellaneous appiications, if any, shall standclosed.
SD/- K.SAILESHI
DEPUrySECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPYII
To,1. One CC to SRl. K NARST REDDY Advocate tOpUCI2. Two CCs to Gp FOR REVENUE (TG) ,High Court for the State ofTelangana. [OUT]3. Two CD Copies TLNS{nq.
HIGH COURT
DATED:2911212023
ORDERCC.No.273 of 2017
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
M.\,rz\-t*'
Zli [[i'u ][Uii])1r*t!* Tcr?;