Telangana High Court
WP/4334/2008 of Chitturi Venkateswara Rao, Vs Tanuku Municipality, on 29 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 4334 of 2008 Between: Chitturi Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Sri Chitturi Gandhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADAWRIT PETITION NO : 4334 of 2008
Between:
Chitturi Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Sri Chitturi Gandhi Garu, Tanuku, West Godavari Dist.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 Tanuku Municipality, rep. by its Commissioner, Tanuku, West Godavari District.
2 Smt. Reddy Surya Vijaya Nagamohini, W/o. Sri R. Srinivas, Velpuru village, Tanuku Mandal, West Godavari District.
3 Smt. Nooli Umamaheswari W/o. Sri N. Venkatarathnam, Tanuku, West Godavari District. Tanuku, West Godavari District.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying thatin the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Courtwill be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one inthe nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondentNo.1 in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated19.02.2008 to take action against the illegal and unauthorizedconstructions activities of the respondent Nos.2 and 3 in SurveyNos.65/1 and 26/1 situate in Tanuku Municipality, Tanuku, WestGodavari District, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional andconsequentially direct the first respondent to take immediate necessaryaction to desist from the unauthorized and illegal construction activitiesof the 2nd and 3rd respondents in Survey Nos.65/1 and 26/1 situate inTanuku Municipality, Tanuku Town and to pass such other appropriateorder or orders Counsel for Petitioner: MS.DEVINENI RADHA RANI
Counsel for Respondents: MR.S.NAGESWARA REDDY
The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Sri D. Radha Rani, learned counsel for the petitioner filed a letterdated 26.12.2008 before the Registry seeking permission of this Court towithdraw the writ petition.
Permission is accorded, and the Writ Petition is dismissed aswithdrawn.
29[th] December, 2008
__________________________
(Gopala Krishna Tamada, J.)
Js.