Telangana High Court

WP/4334/2008 of Chitturi Venkateswara Rao, Vs Tanuku Municipality, on 29 December 2008

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 4334 of 2008 Between: Chitturi Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Sri Chitturi Gandhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADAWRIT PETITION NO : 4334 of 2008

Between:

Chitturi Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Sri Chitturi Gandhi Garu, Tanuku, West Godavari Dist.

..... PETITIONER

AND

1 Tanuku Municipality, rep. by its Commissioner, Tanuku, West Godavari District.

2 Smt. Reddy Surya Vijaya Nagamohini, W/o. Sri R. Srinivas, Velpuru village, Tanuku Mandal, West Godavari District.

3 Smt. Nooli Umamaheswari W/o. Sri N. Venkatarathnam, Tanuku, West Godavari District. Tanuku, West Godavari District.

.....RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying thatin the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Courtwill be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one inthe nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondentNo.1 in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated19.02.2008 to take action against the illegal and unauthorizedconstructions activities of the respondent Nos.2 and 3 in SurveyNos.65/1 and 26/1 situate in Tanuku Municipality, Tanuku, WestGodavari District, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional andconsequentially direct the first respondent to take immediate necessaryaction to desist from the unauthorized and illegal construction activitiesof the 2nd and 3rd respondents in Survey Nos.65/1 and 26/1 situate inTanuku Municipality, Tanuku Town and to pass such other appropriateorder or orders Counsel for Petitioner: MS.DEVINENI RADHA RANI

Counsel for Respondents: MR.S.NAGESWARA REDDY

The Court made the following :

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Sri D. Radha Rani, learned counsel for the petitioner filed a letterdated 26.12.2008 before the Registry seeking permission of this Court towithdraw the writ petition.

Permission is accorded, and the Writ Petition is dismissed aswithdrawn.

29[th] December, 2008

__________________________

(Gopala Krishna Tamada, J.)

Js.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead