Telangana High Court
WP/9167/1999 of G.Chandraiah Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh on 24 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 9167 of 1999 Between: G.Chandraiah
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHTPRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMEDand THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO : 9167 of 1999
Between:
G.Chandraiah S/o Roasiah Gruhakalpa, A.P.Housing Board, Hyderabad
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Housing Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad-500 022. Housing Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad-500 022.
2 Vice-Chairman and Managing Director Housing Department, Gruhakalpa, Hyderabad. Gruhakalpa, Hyderabad.
3 Sri S.Madava Rao A.P.Housing Board, Vijayawada Circle, Hyderabad Hyderabad
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the HighCourt will be pleased to issue a writ or order or directions, particularly,in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1strespondent for not considering the case of the petitioner to the post ofSuperintending Engineer in the existing vacancy as illegal, arbitrary,contrary to law and muchless denying the promotion of the eligible andqualified persons like the petitioner, deviating the rules besidesviolative of article 14, 16, 21 and 309 of the Constitution of India andfurther directing the 1st respondent to revert unofficial respondentswho are not eligible and qualified to hold the higher posts Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.V.RAJA RAAM
Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sri V.C.H. Naidu Counsel for Respondent No.3: MR.A.K.JAYAPRAKASH RAO
The Court made the following :
ORDER: (per Sri Ghulam Mohammed, J)
The petitioner, Sri G. Chandraiah filed letter dated 22-12-2008 in the Registry seeking permission of the Court towithdraw the writ petition stating that he is facing departmentalproceedings and liberty may be given to him to avail appropriateremedies as per law, if necessity arises.
Letter dated 22-12-2008 is made part of the record. Recordingthe statement of the petitioner in the said letter, permission is accordedand the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms ofthe prayer made. No order as to costs.
GHULAM MOHAMMED, J
B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J