Telangana High Court

WP/42384/2015 of K.Adinarayana, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 30 December 2015

Cites 0, Cited by 0

P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No. 42384 of 2015 ORDER: Petitioner is the Field Assistant in Yendurivaripalem Gram Panchayat. The petitioner claims to have been appointed in the year 2006 and he is in continuous service. By proceedings dated 24.06.2015, he was served with a show cause notice

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAOWRIT PETITION No. 42384 of 2015

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Petitioner is the Field Assistant in YendurivaripalemGram Panchayat. The petitioner claims to have beenappointed in the year 2006 and he is in continuousservice. By proceedings dated 24.06.2015, he wasserved with a show cause notice asking him to submit hisexplanation on the allegations levelled in the show causenotice. Simultaneously, his services were also placedunder temporary removal. Petitioner has filed hisexplanation on 10.07.2015. The grievance of thepetitioner necessitating for initiation of this writ petition isthat so far, no action has been taken after submission ofhis explanation. However, he was kept out ofemployment and there is serious endeavour made to fillup the vacancy.

2. The service conditions of Field Assistants aregoverned by Human Resources Policy. As per paragraphNo.13 of the said Policy, whenever disciplinary action isinitiated against the Field Assistant, the proceedingsshould be concluded within a period of 30 days. While so,in the instant case, though show cause notice was issuedon 24.06.2015, so far, issue is not finalized and noreasons are forthcoming. Learned Standing Counsel forthe 2[nd] respondent submits that the writ petition may be disposed of granting 30 days time to finalize theproceedings.

3. Having regard to the above submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 2[nd] respondent tofinalize the disciplinary proceedings against the petitionerwithin a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receiptof a copy of this order. Until the disciplinary proceedingsare finalized, the 2[nd] respondent is directed not to fill upthe post of Field Assistant. There shall be no order as tocosts.

4. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if anypending in this writ petition, shall stand closed.

___________________

P. NAVEEN

RAO, J

30[th] December, 2015

siva

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead