Telangana High Court
WP/46398/2022 of M. Janardhan Reddy, Vs State of Telangana AND 7 others on 29 December 2022
C0T RT FOIi I'III' S'IATE, OF'I'ELANCANA ,- AT IIYDI]RABAD (Spccial Original .l urisd iction) I III]I{SI)AY. 'I'I II]'I'WI]N'fY NINTH DAY OIT DECEMBER 'r'wo l'HOrjsAND AND ]-WENTY TWO ,- PRESf,NT 1'III'] II0NOI]I{AI}I,I] SRI .'US'TICE I}.VIJAYSEN REDDY ,. Brtrr ct,n: M. Janardhan Reddy. S/o.
|3rn3 |
III(;II C0T RT FOIi I'III' S'IATE, OF'I'ELANCANA [,-]AT IIYDI]RABAD(Spccial Original .l urisd iction)
I III]I{SI)AY. ['I'I ]II]'I'WI]N'fY NINTH DAY OIT DECEMBER'r'wo l'HOrjsAND AND ]-WENTY TWO ,-PRESf,NT
1'III'] II0NOI]I{AI}I,I] SRI .'US'TICE I}.VIJAYSEN REDDY ,.
\\ Itl'f P[.'l lI lON NO: 46398 OF 2022
Brtrr ct,n:
M. Janardhan Reddy. S/o. Yadi Reddy, R/o. Plot No. 21, Jupiter Colony, Tirumalghcrry.Sccundcrabad.'l'elangana State.
...PETITIONER
ANI)
l. Statc ot"l'elangana, Reprcscrrted by its Principal Secretary, Home Department,Sccretariat, I lyderabad, ['l'e ]langana.Sccretariat, I lyderabad, ['l'e ]langana.
2. Statc ol'l'clangana, Reprcsented b1, its Principal Secretary. Revenue Department,SL'crctar;at. I lydcrabad,'l'elangana.SL'crctar;at. I lydcrabad,'l'elangana.
.1. l)istrict [(lollcctor. ]Malka.igiri Division. Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Telangan4. Rcvcnuc I)ivisional OI'[icer, Malkajgiri Division, Medchal-Malkajgiri District.'l'elanga na4. Rcvcnuc I)ivisional OI'[icer, Malkajgiri Division, Medchal-Malkajgiri District.'l'elanga na nai. ['l'ahsildar. ]Malkajgiri [)ivision. Medchal-Malkaj giri District, ['Ielangana.]
6. ['l'he ]Station Ilouse Olliccr', Alwal Police Statiou, Hyderabad, Telangana.7. lraiz Alrn.rcd. S/o late Osnran Ahmed. R/o. 20-4-335 Osman Cottage. KhilwarIllderabad - 5000027. lraiz Alrn.rcd. S/o late Osnran Ahmed. R/o. 20-4-335 Osman Cottage. KhilwarIllderabad - 500002
8. Ninrrrra Mohan Reddy. S/o Ila l{cddy. R/o. Plot No 8 NCL Enclave, Pet-basheerahad. Quthbul lapur Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Telangana.had. Quthbul lapur Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Telangana.
"'RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thccircumstanccs s(ated in tlrc allidavit filed thcrcwith, the High Court may bc pleased toissue au appropriatc Writ. Order or Dircclion more particularly one in the nature of Writol'Mandanrus declaring thc action ot'the 6'r' Respondent in interfering in civil disputcsin land adnrcasuring Ac. 2.24 Guntas in Sy.No. 573 and Ac.2.l6 guntas in Sy.No. 574.totally adrneasuring Ac. 5.00 situated at Old AIwal Village, Alwal Municipality,Malkajgiri Mandal, Ranga lleddy District and threatening to dispossess the Petitioner atbehcst of the Rcspondcnt Nos.7 and 8, inspite ofjudgment and decree ol thc Hon'blcl'rl. Sr. [('ivil ].luclgc in [().S. ]No. 769 ol'2010 dated 11.12.2018 rvherein perpetualirr.iurrctiun \\0s gritr)tcd in lhvoLrr ol'the Pctitioner against the unolficial Respondent Nos.7 and 8. as illegal. arbitrary, contrary to law and in violation of Articles 14, l9 and 2l oltho Constitution ancl consequently direct thc olficial Respondents not to interf-ere withtlre possossion ol'thc Petitioncr in Iand adnreasuring Ac.2.24 Guntas in Sy.No. 573 andAc. 2. i(r !luntas in Sy.No. 574. totally admeasuling Ac. 5.00 situated at Old Alwal Villasc. ,\lurl MLrnicil,alitl. Malka.igiri Mandal. Itanga Rcddl I)istrict withoutl,rllrrrr inu ,.lrtc pr,rc,.ss trl' arr:
l.\ NO: I OF 21t22
Petition undcr Sertion l5l CPC praying that in the circumstancer; staled in thelllldalit lilccl irr sr.rpport )f the petition, the Iligh Court may be plcirscd be to direct thell.cspondents nrore particr larll the Rcspondent No. 6 not to intert'cr(' [..r'ith ]possession ofl)ctitioncr in larrd ad-nrcasuring Ac.2.24 Ciuntas in Sy.No.573 and r\c. .2.16 guntas inS1 .No. 574. totall) adr )eirsuring Ac. 5.00 situated at Old Alrval \ illage. AlwalMunicipalitl'. Malkaigiri rlandal, Ranga Reddy District Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. KONDAPARTHY KIF,\N k.LIMAR
Counscl firr thc Respondt nt Nos. I & 6: GP FOR TIOME
(lounscl for thc Respond€nl Nr)s.2 lo 5: GP l.-O R RUVENUE
'fhe Court nradr thc follo'ving:
HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDYWRIT PETITION No.46398 OF 2022
ORDER:(ORAL)
This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of respondentNo.6-Station House Officer, Alwal Police Station, Hyderabad,tninterfering in the civil disputes in respect of the land admeasuringAcs.2.24 guntas in Survey No.573 and Acs.2.16 guntas in Sy.No.574,totally admeasuring Acs.5.00, situated at Old Alwal village, AlwalMunicipality, Malkajgiri Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, andthreatening to dispossess the petitioner at the behest of respondentNos.7 and 8 in spite of the [judgment ]and decree dated 31 .12.2018passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District atL.B.Nagar, in O.S.No.769 oI 2010 filed for perpetual injunction.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedAssistant Government Pleader for Home, and perused the materialavailable on record.
3. ln the written instructions dated 29.12.2022 received by thelearned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, it is stated that onreceipt of a complaint filed by one Nimma lVohan Reddy (respondentNo.B), First lnformation Report No.87B of 2022 of Alwal Police Stationwas registered on 22.12.2022 for lhe offences under Sections 427 and447 of lndian Penal Code, ['1860. ]The petitioner and others are \
accused in the said crime. A copy of the said First lnf rrma:ion Reportis annexed to th= written instructions and also a cop)' [,:rf ]the same isserved upon the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. ln view of he above, the writ petition is closed e s no orders arerequired to be pirssed. However, it is made clear that lrL p)lice, wh leconducting investigation in First lnformation Report Nr,.ti7B of 2022 oIAlwal Police Stalion, Cyberabad, shall not interfere in tl-re ci,ril disputespending betweon the petitioner and unofficial espondentstnconnectton with tre subject land without following due tr,rr:rcer;s of law.
To,
As a sequt I thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pendingin the writ petitiorrstand closed. No order as to costs SA\.\UI,LAH [[ANSARI]]ASSIST,\N-T REGISTRAR lCER,r*#
SD/- MOHD. SA\.\UI,LAH [[ANSARI]]
//TRUE COPYII
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. One CC to [SRI. ]I -ONDAPARTHY [KIRAN KUMAR ][Advocat: ]['OPUCI]
2. Two CCs to GP I [OR ][HOME, High ][Court for ][the ][State ][of ][Telarrgrrna' ][[OUT]]3. Two CCs to [GP ][I ][OR ][REVENUE, ][High Court ][for ][the State ][of ]['-eiangana' ][[OUT]]4. Two CD Copies3. Two CCs to [GP ][I ][OR ][REVENUE, ][High Court ][for ][the State ][of ]['-eiangana' ][[OUT]]4. Two CD Copies l [(; ][( ][()I ]tt.l uVtt,,, DATIID: 29t12t2022
ot{l)ut{
-.EL.AAJGi\'t+tv\N\,.Eqs
\\ I'. No.{6-1911 ol 2(}22
\\'RI't'PEt'il tON rS [( ]r. )sEr) OF-WtTHOLT COSTS