Telangana High Court
WP/32359/2011 of Borally Mallesham Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep by its Principal on 31 December 2024
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY , THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO : 32359 oF 2011 Between: ,Y,."}il*'lafl :*B,,.?fi :ffi r,ffi f;
H]GH COURT [FOR THE STATE OF ][TELANGANA]AT HYDERABAD(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE [THIRTY ][FIRST DAY ][OF ][DECEMBER]TWO THOUSAND [AND ][TWENry ][FOUR]
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE [SRIJUSTICE ][K. SARATH]
WRIT PETITION [NO][: 32359][ oF ][2011]
[ [33021]
Between:BorallyAmista,Y,."}il*'lafl [:*B,,.?fi ][:ffi ][r,ffi ][f; ][goii^',,?l#'occ:AericurtureFr/o]
...PETITIONER
AND1. " The Govemment [of ][Andhra ][Pradesh Rep by its Principal, ][secretary' ][Revenue]Depa-rtment, Secretariat, Hyderabad1. " The Govemment [of ][Andhra ][Pradesh Rep by its Principal, ][secretary' ][Revenue]Depa-rtment, Secretariat, Hyderabad
2. The Tahsildar, [Bhoothpur ][Mandal' ][Mahabubnagar ][District]
'R?{cl,lffi [?ii?ST,'r#3*Bi:tfifl',?,"-LtlBtBi,?##3,'nEno'oo"]
-ff{elx,1?",1ieEl'Jfi ;"',^B3iffii,i,3tffi IEiRSr,'#3{lHn',**o;"',^B3iffii,i,3tffi IEiRSr,'#3{lHn',**o
...RESPONDENTS
PetitionunderArticle226oftheconstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthecircumstances [stated ][in ][the ][affidavit ][filed ][therewith' ][the ][High Court may ][be]pleased to lssue [a ][writ' ][order ][or ][direction more particularly ][one ][in ][the ][nature of]WritofMandamusdeclaringtheorderoftheTahsildar,Bhoothpur'inproceedingsNo.A/3190/2005'dt.25.l0.20llisillegal,arbitrary,violativeofprinciplesofnatural [justice ][and contrary ][to the ][provisions ][of ][A'P' ][ROR ][in ][Land ][and ][Pattedar]Pass Books [Act ][1971 ][and ][consequently ][set ][aside ][the ][same and ][restore ][order ][of]M.R.O. Bhoothpur [vide order ][dt ][8 ][1'2001 in File ][No' ][N164112011]
l.A. NO: [1][ oF ][2011][ (WPMP. ][NO:][ 40213 ][0][F 201][1)]
Page 1 of 2
PetitionunderSectionlslCPCprayingthatinthecircums{ancesstatedinthe affidavit [fited ][in .rpp"o.t'li ][tn"-pltitionl ][the ][High Court may ][be ][pleased]
suspend the order dt.25.10.2011 vide proceedings No. A/3190i2005 on the file ofTahsildar, Bhoothpur, Mahabubnagar District during the pendency of writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. M ACHUTA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.l&2: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3&4: SRI G SHIVA KUMAR GOUD
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
UIRIT PETITION No.32359 of 2OlL
ORDER:
karned Counsel appearing for the [petitioner]submits that no further [orders ]are [necessary ][in ][this]matter ald the cause in the [Writ ][Petition ][does not]survive and thereby, the [Writ ][Petition ][has ][become]infructuous.
2. Recording the aforementioned submission, [tJ:e]Writ Petition is dismissed [as ]infructuous. [There shall]be no order as to costs.
As sequel to it, Miscellaneous [Petitions, ][if ][any]
pending, shall s tald closed
/TTRUE [COPY//]
ANABHA [REDDY]SD/.P.PADMASSISTANT [REGISTRAR]SECTION [OFFIC][ER]
'O,.. ON" CC tO [SRI. ][M ][ACHUTA ][REDDY ][AdVOCAIC ][IOPUC]]
2. Two [ccs to ][Gp FoR ][REVEN,E ][,High ][court ][for ][the ][state ][of ][rerangana']
TOUTI
3. One [CC ][to ][SRI G SHIVA KUMAR GOUD Advocate [OPUC]]
4. Two [CD ][CoPies]KKSBSK
HIGH COURT
DATED:3111212024
ORDER
WP.No.32359 of 2011
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONAS INFRUCTUOUSWITHOUT COSTS
?+gilrEr-[( [r(-*5]
.,,'/: -.- iY\'1 '':' .[-]_ t -=-.aJ i (r.(/...j.'-(ilt',ii>ll; 0i i-|..:JCtr\\-l:,'.-'..,*\'.: '--:-I" .')r..-.. ^
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…