Telangana High Court

CRLP/11550/2017 of Syed Riyaz Ahmed Vs The State of Telangana on 29 December 2017

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Crl.M.P.No.12805 OF 2017 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO.11550 OF 2017 ORDER: Crl.M.P.No.12805 OF 2017 This miscellaneous petition is filed under Section 320 of Cr.P.C seeking permission to compromise and compound the offences to quash the proceedings in

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Crl.M.P.No.12805 OF 2017IN/ANDCRIMINAL PETITION NO.11550 OF 2017

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Crl.M.P.No.12805 OF 2017

This miscellaneous petition is filed under Section 320 of Cr.P.C seeking permission to compromise and compound the offences to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.503 of 2016, for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A & 406 IPC & Sections 4 & 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

The petitioners nos.2 & 3/A-2 & A-3 and the second respondent/ defacto complainant are present and they are identified by their respective counsel and produced Photostat copies of Aadhar cards to prove their identity. Petitioner nos. 1 & 4 /A-1 & A-4 are not present, but they are represented by the second petitioner/A-2 by Special Power of Attorney.

A joint memo of compromise is filed by both the parties, when terms of compromise are explained in Urdu language by Learned Public Prosecutor for the State of Telangana, they are admitted to be true and correct. Further, it is now submitted that, both the petitioners/A-1 to A-4 and the second respondent/defacto complainant voluntarily entered into compromise due to intervention of elders and well-wishers and they wanted to lead peaceful life.

Therefore, I find that the compromise is voluntary in the interest of both parties and permission is granted to compound the offence. Hence, compromise is recorded in terms of the joint memo of compromise filed along with this petition. Accordingly, this petition is ordered.

Crl.P.NO.11550 OF 2017

In view of the orders passed by this Court Crl.M.P.No.12805 OF 2017, this criminal petition is allowed.

in

Registry is directed to annex a copy of joint memo of compromise filed by both the parties, to this order.

Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall also stand closed. No costs.

_________________________________________

JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Date:29.12.2017

SP

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead