Telangana High Court
WP/42598/2016 of Saladi Rajeswari, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Prl Secretary, on 29 December 2016
SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.42598 OF 2016 Dated:29.12.2016 Between: Saladi Rajeswari, W/o. Late Narayana Rao, Aged about 70 years, R/o.13-211/1, Old Ramalayam Street, Kothapeta, East Godavari District and another .. Petitioners And The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.42598 OF 2016
Dated:29.12.2016
Between:
Saladi Rajeswari, W/o. Late Narayana Rao, Aged about 70 years, R/o.13-211/1, Old Ramalayam Street, Kothapeta, East Godavari District and another
.. Petitioners
And
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Roads and Buildings Department, secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District and others
.. Respondents
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.42598 OF 2016
ORDER:
Heard. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission.
2. The grievance of the petitioners is that the without following the procedure as required in law, the respondents are undertaking construction of a permanent Horticulture Market Yard in between their agricultural land and the road margin and the same is obstructing the ingress and egress of their property, which is ex facie illegal.
3. When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads and Buildings, on instructions, submits that the respondents would follow the due procedure as required in law before constructing the Horticulture Market Yard and in case the agricultural land of the petitioners is affected, necessary steps would be taken.
4. In view of the said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to follow the due procedure before constructing the Horticulture Market Yard and shall not cause any obstruction to the property of the petitioners without following due procedure. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
____________________
P. NAVEEN RAO, J Date:29.12.2016 KH