Telangana High Court

PIL/514/2013 of The Vijaya Electrical Causal Workers Union, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh represented by its on 30 December 2013

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.514 OF 2013 DATED:30.12.2013 Between: The Vijaya Electrical Casual

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

PRESENT

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.514 OF 2013

DATED:30.12.2013

Between:

The Vijaya Electrical Casual Workers UnionRegd. No.A/T/128/013, Rudraram VillagePatancheru MandalMedak DistrictRep. by its President R. Eashwar PrasadR/o. No.22560, Type-II Qrs.,Ordinance Factory Medak,Yeddumailaram, Medak District (AP) … Petitioner

And

The Government of Andhra PradeshRep. by its Principal SecretaryLabour DepartmentSecretariatHyderabadand others … Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA ANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.514 OF 2013

ORDER:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)

This matter does not require any hearing on filing of counteraffidavit. The petitioner is an office bearer of a union of a large numberof casual workers. A representation has been made to respondentNo.3 - Joint Commissioner of Labour for redressal of grievance,amongst others, of non-regularization and absorption of casualworkers.

Learned counsel for the State submits that steps have alreadybeen taken pursuant to the representation by issuing notice. However,no final decision has yet been taken.

Since we are disposing of this matter at this stage without callingfor affidavits, we pass the following order.

We direct the Commissioner/Joint Commissioner of Labour,whosoever is dealing with the matter, will come to a logical conclusionon the issue, after giving opportunity of hearing to the concerned, ifaction has already been taken, within a period of two months from thedate of communication of this order. If no action has been taken, thenthe appropriate Commissioner shall take action in accordance with lawon the representation made by the petitioner and then decision shallbe taken in accordance with law. In that case, the entire exercise shallbe completed within a period of three months from the date ofcommunication of this order.

With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. There will be no order as to costs.

Consequently, P.I.L.M.P. No.791 of 2013 filed by the petitioner toexpedite the hearing of the writ petition, shall stand closed.

________________________

K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ

_______________________

SANJAY KUMAR, J

30.12.2013bnr

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead