Telangana High Court

WP/8517/2005 of M/s. Masqati Dairy Products ( Regd Partnership Concern), Vs Government of A.P., rep. by its Prl. Secretary, on 28 December 2005

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION Nos.8399, 8400, 8515, 8516, 8517, 8519 AND 8520 OF 2005 Date: 28-12-2005 Between: M/s Masqati Dairy Products (Regd Partnership concern) Rep. by its Managing Partner Mr Sultan Bin Ibrahim Masqati

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI

AND

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU

WRIT PETITION Nos.8399, 8400, 8515, 8516, 8517, 8519 AND

8520 OF 2005

Date: 28-12-2005

Between:

M/s Masqati Dairy Products (Regd Partnership concern)

Rep. by its Managing Partner Mr Sultan Bin Ibrahim Masqati

….Petitioner

and

Government of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary, Commercial Tax Departmentand Others …Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI

AND

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU

WRIT PETITION Nos.8399, 8400, 8515, 8516, 8517, 8519 AND 8520 OF 2005

O R D E R (Per the Hon’ble Sri Bilal Nazki, J):

The orders impugned in these writ petitions are appealable orders. Since anefficacious alternative remedy is available to the petitioner, we do not think weshould entertain the writ petitions at this stage. The writ petitions are accordinglydismissed. However, in the interest of justice, we grant two weeks time from today tothe petitioner to file appeals. The appeals may be disposed of by the authorities concerned within a period of three months after their presentation. For a period offour weeks from today, the stay granted earlier by this Court shall remain operativeand after the appeals are filed, it will be for the authorities concerned to pass ordersgranting or refusing stay, if any stay application is made by the petitioner. No orderas to costs.

_____________________

(Bilal Nazki, J)

28[th] December, 2005

___________________

(C.V.Ramulu,J)

vrn

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead