Telangana High Court
WP/24863/2004 of Datla Padmavathi, Vs The Addl. Agent to the Govt., on 30 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No. 24863 of 2004 Between: Datla Padmavathi, W/o. Venkatapathi Raju, R/o. Laxminarasapuram
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA
Between:
WRIT PETITION No. 24863 of 2004
Datla Padmavathi, W/o. Venkatapathi Raju,R/o. Laxminarasapuram Village, Anaparthi Mandal, E.G.District.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 The Addl. Agent to the Government,Rampachodavaram, E.G.District.2 The Special Deputy Collector, Tribal Welfare, Rampachodavaram, East Godavari District.Rampachodavaram, E.G.District.2 The Special Deputy Collector, Tribal Welfare, Rampachodavaram, East Godavari District.
3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Rajavommangi ( M) E.G.District. .....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writof mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 & 3 in evicting the petitionerfrom the lands to an extent of Ac. 9-57 cents of land in Sy.No.43/1, 52 and 53/2 ofDusaripamu village, Rajavommangi Mandal, E.G.District in pursuance of the ordersin L.T.R.P. Nos. 171/2003 to 174/2003 passed by the 2nd respondent as illegal,arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondents not to evict thepetitioner from the above lands pending disposal of the appeal preferred before thefirst respondent in the interest of justice.Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.K.VENKATESHCounsel for Respondents : G.P. FOR REVENUE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that he filed appeals before thefirst respondent on 8.12.2004 against the common order passed by the secondrespondent in L.T.R.P.Nos. 171, 172, 173 and 174 of 2003 dated 10.6.2004, but thefirst respondent neither considered the same nor passed any orders so far andhence aggrieved by the inaction of the first respondent, the present writ petition isfiled.
Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Government Pleader forRevenue and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition at the stage ofadmission.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the first respondent isdirected to consider the appeals filed by the petitioner on 8.12.2004 against thecommon order passed by the second respondent in L.T.R.P.Nos. 171, 172, 173 and174 of 2003 dated 10.6.2004 and shall dispose of the same in accordance with law,expeditiously, if not already disposed of. Till such time, Status quo existing as ontoday, shall be maintained.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.
Date: 30.12.2004
_____________
N.V.RAMANA, J
TVK/DA
To
1 The Addl. Agent to the Government, East Godavari District at Rampachodavaram.
2 The Special Deputy Collector, Tribal Welfare, Rampachodavaram, East Godavari District. East Godavari District.
3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Rajavommangi (M), East Godavari District.District.
4 Two CCs to the G.P. for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT).Hyderabad (OUT).
5 Two CD copies.