CRP/4839/2014 of SYED ASGHAR HUSSAIN Vs Mrs. ASMAN MEHMOOD on 31 December 2014

Arguments

COMMON ORDER :

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners inthese civil revision petitions do not press the civil revisionpetitions on merits and seeks direction to the Family Courtto decide O.P.No.216 of 2013 within time frame.

2. O.P.No.216 of 2013 is filed by the father underthe provisions of Guardians and Wards Act, 1890,seeking custody of their son – Syed Azber Hussain. Thefather-husband is a resident of U.S.A. and often visitsIndia to meet his child. Keeping that in view, andconsidering the submissions of learned counsel for thepetitioners, I am satisfied that the following order shallmeet the ends of justice:

The civil revision petitions are disposed of as notpressed. The Family Court shall endeavour to dispose ofO.P.No.216 of 2013 as expeditiously as possible andpreferably within a period of six months from the date ofreceipt of this order. It is needless to mention that thehusband shall make himself available for concluding thetrial within the stipulated time and shall avoid to seek anyadjournments. Consequently, miscellaneous petitionspending, if any, also stand disposed of. No order as tocosts.

___________________________

BHOSALE

JUSTICE DILIP B.

31.12.2014.Msr

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE

CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.3884 and 4839 of 2014

31.12.2014Msr