Telangana High Court
WP/14311/2006 of G. Srikanth S/o Sri G. Sampath Rao Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh, repby Principal on 28 December 2006
R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.14311 of 2006 Dated:28.12.2006 Between: G.Srikanth. …Petitioner and Govt., of A.P., and others. …Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.14311 of 2006 ORDER: Though interlocutory matters are listed for hearing, at
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.14311 of 2006
Dated:28.12.2006
Between:G.Srikanth.andGovt., of A.P., and others.
…Petitioner…Respondent
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.14311 of 2006
ORDER:
Though interlocutory matters are listed for hearing, at the requestof the learned Advocates for the parties, the Writ Petition itself is heardand disposed of.
The petitioner, who is presently working as a Lecturer in theGovernment Junior College, Razole, East Godavari District, filed thisWrit Petition seeking a writ of mandamus to declare the action ofrespondents 5 to 8 in not taking up the selections in the S.C BacklogAided vacancies, pursuant to the notification published in the IndianExpress Daily News Paper, dated 07.07.2005, as illegal and arbitrary,and for a consequential direction to fill up the vacancies as perG.O.Ms.No.214, dated 08.05.2001.
In the Writ Petition, it is stated that the petitioner is presently agedabout 43 years and though the respondents have notified the vacancies, selection process is being postponed indefinitely withoutany valid reason. It is the case of the petitioner that for the purpose ofselections, the procedure as notified in G.O.Ms.No.214, dated08.05.2001, is to be followed.
On the other hand, it is submitted by Sri Ram Mohan Rao,learned Counsel appearing for the College for which the vacancies areto be filled, that as much as there are directions from this Court inW.P.No.25761 of 2005 to fill up the vacancies by following theprocedure laid down in G.O.Ms.No.12, dated 10.01.1992, and some ofthe applicants represented for adopting G.O.Ms.No.214, dated08.05.2001, the selections were postponed. It is submitted that asmuch as there are already directions from this Court in W.P.No.25761of 2005, which have become final, respondents are prepared to fill upthe vacancies as per the directions issued by this Court.
As much as it is not in dispute that certain Backlog Aidedvacancies are available and respondents have already notified thosevacancies to be filled up by following the procedure, which isapplicable as per the rules framed in this regard, and it is also the caseof the Management that in view of the directions issued by this Court inW.P.No.25761 of 2005, the respondents will fill up the vacancies byfollowing the procedure as contemplated under G.O.Ms.No.12, dated10.01.1992, I dispose of the Writ Petition directing the respondent-Management to fill up the vacancies as expeditiously as possible,preferably, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of acopy of this order by implementing the directions issued by this Courtin W.P.No.25761 of 2005 or any other applicable rules in this regard. Itis open for the respondents either to proceed with the selections as perthe earlier notification or by issuing a fresh notification in this regard tofill up the vacancies.
Subject to the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
28.12.2006Note: Issue C.C in three days.B/o. vs ___________________(R.SUBHASH REDDY, J)