Telangana High Court

WP/29366/2012 of V.Mallesh, S/o. Late Nagamallaih, Vs The State of Andhra P -adzsh rep by its on 31 December 2012

SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.29366 of 2012 Dated 31st December, 2012 Between: V.Mallesh and another …Petitioners and The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its District Collector, YSR District and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDYWrit Petition No.29366 of 2012

Between:

Dated 31stDecember, 2012

V.Mallesh and another

and

…Petitioners

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its District Collector, YSR Districtand others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri V.R.Reddy KovvuriCounsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP for Revenue The Court made the following:

ORDER:

This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief:

“…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularlyone in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action ofrespondent No.3 in including the land in an extent of Ac.0.69cents in Sy.No.887/7 of Chinthakommadinne Village fields,Chinthakommadinne Mandal, YSR District in the list ofAssigned/Government lands basing on dots in Resurvey andRe-settlement Register and consequential action ofrespondent No.4 in refusing to entertain the Sale Deeds forregistration basing on the list of Assigned/Government landsfurnished by respondent No.3 as arbitrary, illegal, contrary tothe provisions of the Registration Act, 1908 and settledprinciples of legal position and violative of the fundamental andConstitutional rights guaranteed to the petitioners underArticles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India andconsequently set aside the list of Assigned/Government landsinsofar as the land in an extent of Ac.0.69 cents in SurveyNo.887/7 of Chinthakommadinne Village fields,Chinthakommadinne Mandal, YSR District furnished byrespondent No.3 and also direct respondent No.4 to entertainthe Sale Deeds for registration of the same.”

At the hearing, Sri V.R.Reddy Kovvuri, learned counsel for the petitioners, sought permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.37471of 2012 shall stand disposed of as infructuous.

31[st] December, 2012VGB

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead