Telangana High Court
WP/36964/2021 of Sri. Borra Bavaiah alias Babu Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others on 31 December 2021
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY , THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 36964 0F 2 021 Between: AND 1 2 ,1 . Sri. Borra Bavaiah atias Babu, S/o. Sailu, Aged
FRIDAY ,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF [DECEMBER]TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [B.VIJAYSEN REDDY]
WRIT PETITION NO: 36964 [0F ][2][021]
Between:
,1 . Sri. Borra Bavaiah atias Babu, S/o. Sailu, Aged about 50 Years, occ: Agriculture,ilo. ff-.ruoS-CB, Balaput [Village and Mandal, Ranga.Reddy District'][[RJo']]ilo. ff-.ruoS-CB, Balaput [Village and Mandal, Ranga.Reddy District'][[RJo']]
ff-.ruoS-CB, Balaput Balaput - z. F.i!"r;aA, sii borE-n-rrlnGi,'slo."Siirrl Avijoviriagai, ealiiur X [Aged ]Roads, Meerpet Village, Balapur [ibout ][51"Years,'occ: ][Asriculture' ]Mandal'[[RJo']]Ranga ReddY District.Represented by their [General ][Power of ][Attomey ][with ][Possession Holder]Ranga ReddY District.Represented by their [General ][Power of ][Attomey ][with ][Possession Holder]
M/s. sree Lakshmi [Balaii Developers, ][Represente. ]llJf $Xt?%Bt I"?H%:JiCniouiinlntNursimha [R'eddy ][S/o. Late ][Agl ][Reddy,]EiiLYil;;,'H6. ir,N.j.+-zbii [d#iw ][virragE ][and ][rvrSnoa'i, ]' [Ransa Reddy ]-...PETITIoNER(S)[District. ][_]
AND
1The State of [Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary' (Revenue]Deoartment), Secretariat, [Hvderabad']Deoartment), Secretariat, [Hvderabad']
2i[S?.j,,ii.ir".ii""iiiijlri.p6ii.jr [cenerar ][of stamps and Resisrration, ][l\,4ozamjahi]It/arket. Hvderabad,It/arket. Hvderabad, S ine Oiitrict [Registrar, Ranga ][Reddy-Distrrct']
4. The Sub- Registrar, [L.B Nagar, ][at ][L'B ][Nagar]
...RESPONDENTS
Page 1 of 3
PetitionunderArticle226of|heConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthecircumstancesStatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybepleasedtoissueaWritorderordirectionmoreparticularlyoneinthenatureofWritofMandamus [declaring ][the ][action ][of ][the ][Respondents ][No ][4 ][in ][refusing ][to ][receive]and [release ][the sale ][deed ][or ][sale ][deeds ][presented ][by ][the ][Petitioners ][vide]register PlotsinSurveyNo.lo/Part,12Pan,and13/Part,situatedatMallapurvillage'Balapur Mandal [(earlier Saroornagar ][Mandal)' ][Ranga Reddy District pursuant to ][the]|VEMONo.G2l257l2}1g,dated26-8-2020,issuedbytheofficeoftheRespondentNo.2, under [prohibition ][of ][registration ][of ][unauthorized ][plots and buildings ][against]the Petltioners [plots made ][out ][in ][sanctioned ][layout' ][issued by ][the ][Venkatapuram]as [arbitrary ][illegal ][without ][any ][jurisdiction ][contrary ][to ][the]gram panchayat, provisionsoftheregistrationActlg0BandinviolationofArticlel4ofConstitutionoflndia and [consequently ][direct ][the ][Respondent ][No ][4 ][herein ][to ][receive register ][and]release the [sale ][deed ][presented by ][the ][Petitioner ][in ][respect ][of ][Plots ][in ][Survey ][No']1OlParl,12tParl,and13/Part,situatedatMallapurvillage'BalapurMandal(earlier Saroornagar Mandal), Ranga Reddy District without reference to MEMOINo.G2125712019, dated 26-08-2020, issued by the office of the Respondent No.2.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to directthe respondent No.4 to receive register, and release the sale deed presented bythe petitioner in respect of the plots in survey No. '10/part, 12lpart, and 13/part,situated at Mallapur village, Balapur Mandal (earlier saroornagar Mandal), RangaReddy District without reference to MEMo No.c2t257/-2019, dated 26-08-2020,issued by the office of the Respondent No.2.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRt. GOVIND REDDY KONTHAM
Counsel forthe Respondents: Gp FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
t/
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
Page 2 of 3
WRIT PETITIONNo.36961 oF 202t
ORDER (ORAL):
Sri Govind Reddy Kantham, learned counsel or the petitioners,on instructions of the petitioners, woulcl submit that the petitionersmay be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with libertv to filefresh writ petition.
Conclusion
Recording the aforesaid submission of the leamed counsel forthe petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with libertythe petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with libertyto file fresh writ petition. No order as to costs.
As a sequel theleto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending inthe r,,'rit petition stand closed.
SD/-NAGALAKSHMIASSISTANTREGISTRAR
---iL'-',TRUE COPY//SECTION [OFFICER]
To,21i;; One CC cc.'i" to [Sri. Govind ]-GP for Revenui,'Hign [Reddy ][Kontham, ]court fdvgcalg for the stale [tOPUQl]of relangana atHvderabad. [OUT].>Trlvo CD Copies4One Spare [CoPY]
TR*bs
HIGH [COURT]
DATED:31 [11212021]
ORDERWP.No.36964 of 2021
DISI\4ISSING THE WRIT PETITION,AS WTTHDRAWN/W|THOUT COSTS.
v/.. \ ,\
'iLi\T1i5 zq [JF$][ ?sJ-]t.'---1--t.-.'
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…