Telangana High Court
CRP/2352/2017 of SRI NAVNEETH DAS MAUNDADA, HYD Vs R. SUDHAKAR, HYD AND ANOTHER on 31 December 2020
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEI4BER TWO THOUSAND TWENTY :PRESENT: THE HON. BLE JUSTICE G.SRI DEVI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2352 OF 2OL7 (Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India aggrieved by the order dated 06.01.2017 in IA No.1555 OF
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEI4BERTWO THOUSAND TWENTY
:PRESENT:
THE HON. BLE JUSTICE G.SRI DEVI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2352 [OF ][2OL7]
(Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India aggrieved bythe order dated 06.01.2017 in IA [No.1555 ][OF ][2016 ][in ][AS No.200 ][of]2011 on the file of the Court of the IX Additional [Chief ][Judge, City ][Civil]Court, Hyderabad)
Between:
Sri Navneeth Das Maundada S/o Girdhar [Das ][Mundada]
.. Petition er
AND
1. R.Sudhakar S/o Sita Ramaiah [R/o ][8-3-677/42, ][SKD ][Nagar,]HyderabadHyderabad2. M/s Nutan Textiles, a [proprietary ][concern ][rep. ][by ][its ][Prop:]R.sudhakar S/o Sita Ramaiah [Occ: ][Business ][R/o ][8-3-677/42,]SKD Nagar, Hyderabad.R.sudhakar S/o Sita Ramaiah [Occ: ][Business ][R/o ][8-3-677/42,]SKD Nagar, Hyderabad.
..... Respondents
CRP [4P N o.3078 [O][F ][201,7]
Petition under Section 151 of [CPC ][praying ][that ][in ][the]circumstances stated in the [affidavit ][filed ][therewith, ][the ][High ][Court]may be [pleased ]to stay [all ][further ][proceedings ][in ][AS No.200 ][of ][2011]pending on the file of ihe IX Additional [Chief ][Judge, ][City ][Civil ][Court,]Hyderabad [pending ]disposal [of ][the ][Civil ][Revision Petition.]
Counsel for the Petitioner : [M/s Bankatlal ][Mandhani, Advocate]
Counsel for the [ResPondent ][No]1:Sri Sharad Sanghi, [Advocate]Counsel for the [Respondent ][No]),none a [ppea ]red The Court made the [following ][ORDER]
Page 1 of 2
ORDER:
HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI
CIVIL REVISION PETI'II']N NO,2352 OF 20 [L7]
I-r'irlrrt'cl corLr-Lsei iirr tlre Dcltliottcr tor-Llcl s'.tbttlit thttl lll('t:tiLrsc in tiris rcvision does not sLrrvive lurthcr- ircLjudiciLtion i'irtcl tlt,r-cvision hus bccornc in fructr-Lous.
ln that vieu, of the rr.ratte r, recordir-rg the said submission, theCir,il Rei ision Petition is dismissed as infrl-rctl-lous. There sha11 bcno order as tLr costs.
\'liscclLancons a pplir:r.Ltion s, if ar-l'. pending shaLl sL:rurirlisnrlsserl Sd/-B.SATYAVATHIASSISTANT [REGISTRAR]LlgSECTION OFFICER
,TRUE COPY'
To1. The [IX ][Additional ][Chief ][Judge, Citv Civil ][gfftrJJ ][Hyderabad]Z. One CC [to Sri Sharad Sanghi, Advocate ][(OPUU) ]-;' 6;; 6c i; [a;i e"nxrttat ][lr/5ndhani, Advocate ][(oPUC)]4. Two CD Copies Kj \]-- HIGH COURT
DATED:31 11212020
ORDERCRP.No.2352 of 2017
Dismissing the CRP as infructuous.
6 $5u
.q€516:q5oZo'12 [JAll ][2021]c*r
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…