WP/23000/2020 of M/s. Supermax Personal Care Pvt ltd, Vs Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT) on 30 December 2022

1. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT), Appellate Joint Commissioner (ST)Hyderabad Rural DivisronHyderabad Rural Divisron

2. Commercial Tax Officer, IDA Gandhinagar Circte, Hyderabad3. State of Telangana., represented. by lhe"principal Sdcretary, RevenueDepartment, Telangana Secretaria( Hyderaba'd.3. State of Telangana., represented. by lhe"principal Sdcretary, RevenueDepartment, Telangana Secretaria( Hyderaba'd.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may bepleased to issue a writ, direction or order more particurarry in the nature of a writof mandamus decraring the assessment order A.o.No.3o718 dated 31rost2o1gof mandamus decraring the assessment order A.o.No.3o718 dated 31rost2o1gpassed by the Respondent No.2 and consequenUy the impugned ADC OrderNo. ['1219 ]dated 2910612020 passed by the Respondent No. r as being void.illegal. violative of Article 26sand consequently Article 2g6 of the constitution oflndia. totally without jurisdiction and viorative of the principres of naturar .iusticelA NO: 1 OF 2020No. ['1219 ]dated 2910612020 passed by the Respondent No. r as being void.illegal. violative of Article 26sand consequently Article 2g6 of the constitution oflndia. totally without jurisdiction and viorative of the principres of naturar .iusticelA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased tostay all further proceedings and consequential actions pursuant to theassessment order A.o.No.30718 dated 31ro3tzo1B passed by the Respondent No.2 and consequen y the impugned ADCPassed by the Respondent No. I

Order No. 1 219 dated 2g/O6tZO2O

Counsel for the petitioner: SRl. M. NAGA DEEPAKCounsel for the Respondents No.1to3: SRl.K. RAJt REDDY,Gp FOR COMMERCIAL fAXThe Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BL E [THD CHIE][F. ][JUSTICE ][UJJAL ][BHTIYAN]AND

THE HON'BLE SRI[JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR ][REDDY]

WRIT PETIT ION [No.23OOO ][of ][2O2O]

ORDER: tl).r [1l e ][Llotl'ble ][ttre ][( ]['hr4./usrr.:e ][aril(li ][!irlllrn'l]

Heard Mr. M.NagaDeepak, learned [counsel ][for ][the]petitioner and Mr. [K.Raji]Reddy, learned counsel [for ][the]respondents.

2. Learned counsel [for ][the ][petitioner ][submits ][that ][pursuant]to One Time [Settlement ][(OTS) Scheme ][introduced ][by ][the]Government- of [Telangana, ][petitioner has ][settled ][the ][tax ][dispute]with the State. [Therefore, ][petitioner woutd ][like to withdraw ][the]\ [.rit ]petition.

3. In view of the above, [writ ][petitiorr ][is ][dismissed ][on]

u,ithdrawa[.

Miscellaneous applications [pending, ][if ][any, shall ][stand]closed. However, there [shall ][be ][no ][order ][as ][to ][costs]

SD/.L.SIVA PARVATHIASSISTANT REGISTRAR.,\1tari.- t\ J ". [\ ]',SECTION OFFICER

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. Two CCs to GP [FOR ][COMI/ERCIAL ][TAX, ][High ][Court ][for ][the ][State ][of]Telanoana.at Hyderabad[OUTl -Telanoana.at Hyderabad[OUTl - - Telanoana.at -2. One ct to sRl. [tu. NAGA DEEPAK, Advocate-[OPUUI]2. One ct to sRl. [tu. NAGA DEEPAK, Advocate-[OPUUI]

to sRl. sRl. 5 On" CC to SRl.K. [RAJI REDDY, ][Advocate ][[OPUC]]4. Two CD copies5 On" CC to SRl.K. [RAJI REDDY, ][Advocate ][[OPUC]]4. Two CD copies BM

SW

HIGH COURT

DATED:3011212022

ORDERWP.No.23000 of 2020

1$E [SIA]14,(-1\/.\)oo2 5 J[]l [2t?3]\>.,-.

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWALWITHOUT COSTS

ilD\N[x]