Telangana High Court
WP/25276/2004 of T. Hiranmayi, Vs The Gram Panchayath, on 31 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.25276 of 2004 Between: T. Hiranmayi, w/o Venugopal Reddy, R/o Kothapalli Haveli, Karimnagar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO
WRIT PETITION No.25276 of 2004
Between:
T. Hiranmayi, w/o Venugopal Reddy,R/o Kothapalli Haveli, Karimnagar Mandal & District,
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 The Gram Panchayath, rep. by its Executive Officer, Kothapalli Haveli, Karimnagar Mandal and District.
2 The Executive Engineer, Panchayat Raj, Karimnagar.
3 The District Collector (PR), Karimnagar.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ ofMandamus declaring the action of the respondents in proposing to demolish thehouse of the petitioner bearing H.No.9-133, 9-134 situated at Kothapalli (Haveli),Kothapalli Village,Karimnagar Mandal and District for the purpose of road wideningwithout issuing any notice or following the due process of law as arbitrary andillegal.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.SATYAM REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV.
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO
Page 1 of 2
WRIT PETITION No.25276 of 2004
ORDER:
The petitioner is a resident of Kothapalle Haveli in Karimnagar District. Hefiled writ petition apprehending that the respondents might demolish the petitioner’shouse and property for laying down roadin a World Bank Package scheme. Nomaterial is placed before this Court with regard to the allegation that World BankPackage scheme is being implemented or the apprehension is well founded.However, this Court has no reason to believe that the respondents would resort tohigh-handed action to deprive the petitioner of his property (if he is really the owner).It is needless to say that if any person has to be deprived of his property, dueprocess of law has to be followed.
The writ petition, with the above observations, is dismissed.
December 31, 2004.
_____________
V.V.S.RAO,J
YS
To
1 The Gram Panchayath, rep. by its Executive Officer, Kothapalli Haveli, Karimnagar Mandal and District. Karimnagar Mandal and District.
2 The Executive Engineer, Panchayat Raj, Karimnagar.
3 The District Collector (PR), Karimnagar.
4 Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (O.U.T)
5. Two C.D Copies.
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…