Telangana High Court
WP/26100/2011 of R.Latha Vs The Govt of A.P. on 31 December 2024
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 26100 OF 201'l Between: R.Latha, S/o.R.Ramulu House wife R/o.1-3-205 to
[ [33021]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE [OF ][TELANGANA AT ][HYDERABAD](Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 26100 OF 201'l
Between:
R.Latha, S/o.R.Ramulu House wife R/o.1-3-205 to 213, Kavadiguda, Hyderabad
...PETITIONER
AND
1 . The Govt of A.P., Rep.by its Chief Secretary, Secretariat Hyderabad
2. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad
3. The Collector, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad
4. The Tahsildar, Kavadiguda mandal, Hyderabad District
...RESPONDENTS
Page 1 of 3
Petition under Article 226 oI the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature ofWrit of Mandamus by declaring the Memo issued by the 3rd respondent inLr.No.R2/5194/2009 dated 2'1.10.2009 to pay Rs. 3,43,7501- toward transfer ofrights (Regularization) of Govt land to an extent of S5sq.Yrds in premises No.1-3-205 to 13, Kavadiguda, in T.S.No.98/2, Block H.Ward 76, Bakaram Village,Musheerabad Mandal as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of theConstitution of lndia contradiction to the provisions of G.O.Ms.No.166 dated16.02.2008 issued by Revenue Department besides violative of principles ofnatural justice and consequently set aside the impugned orders and direct the 3rdrespondent to redetermine the amounts to be paid by petitioner towardsregularization of the land as per the provisions of G.O.Ms.No.166 dated16.02.2008.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI SRINIVAS REDDY BALAKISTI
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
-
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [K.SARATH]
WRTT PETITION No.261OO of [2O11]
ORDER:
This petition is coming for [hearing ][since ][2O11. ][On]17.12.2024, when the matter [was ][called, ][there was ][no]representation on behalf of [the ][petitioner, ][and ][therefore]the matter was directed to [be listed ][today ][r-rnder ][the]caption "for Dismissal". [Even ][today, ][when ][the matter ][is]called, there is norepresentation on beha-tf of [the]petitioner. It seems that the petitioner [is not ][interested ][to]prosecute this case.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition [is dismissed ][for]
2.
Page 2 of 3
Non-prosecution/defau1t. [There ][shall be ][no ][order ][as ][to]co sts.
Pending miscellaneous applications, [if ][any ][in ][this]petition, shall stand closed.
:
SD/- T.JAYASREEASSISTANT REGISTRARN._.-.-SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,
1. One CC to SRI SRINIVAS REDDY BALAKISTI, Advocate. IOPUCI
2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana.tourltourl
3. Two CD Copies.
BSKPSK
HIGH COURT
DATED:3111212024
ORDER
WP.No.26100 of [2011]
t.1i{E S14ocfoa3 FfB a.2A?5z*.l+oPATCHEo[*]
DtsMlsslNc THE [WRlr PETlrloN ]F0R [6\ool ][PdLose(orr0N]WITHOUT COSTS(A2.5L2y6
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…