Telangana High Court
WP/25500/2008 of B. Murthaiah Vs The District Collector, (Civil Supplies) on 29 December 2008
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 25500 of 2008 Between: B. Murthaiah S/o. Malakondaiah R/o. Kakarla Village, Ardaveedu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENTTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULUWRIT PETITION NO : 25500 of 2008
Between:
B. Murthaiah S/o. Malakondaiah
R/o. Kakarla Village, Ardaveedu Mandal, Prakasam District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The District Collector, (Civil Supplies) Prakasam District at Ongole.
2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Markapur, Prakasam District.
3 The Tahsildar, Ardaveedu Mandal Prakasam District.
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that inthe circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will bepleased to to issue a writ order or a direction more particularly one in thenature of writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings NoRCH/1597/2008 dt. 15-10-2008 of the second respondent as beingillegal, arbitrary and unreasonable and in gross violation of the principlesof natural justice and consequently set aside the same with a furtherdirection directing the respondents to supply the stocks regularly to thepetitioners fair price shop and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.LAKSHMA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES
The Court made the following :
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU
W.P.No.25500 of 2008
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
The learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.
Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissedas withdrawn. No order as to costs.
Date: 29.12.2008DA
_____________ C.V.RAMULU, J
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU
29.12.2008