Telangana High Court

WP/25500/2008 of B. Murthaiah Vs The District Collector, (Civil Supplies) on 29 December 2008

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 25500 of 2008 Between: B. Murthaiah S/o. Malakondaiah R/o. Kakarla Village, Ardaveedu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT

PRESENTTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULUWRIT PETITION NO : 25500 of 2008

Between:

B. Murthaiah S/o. Malakondaiah

R/o. Kakarla Village, Ardaveedu Mandal, Prakasam District.

..... PETITIONER

AND

1 The District Collector, (Civil Supplies) Prakasam District at Ongole.

2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Markapur, Prakasam District.

3 The Tahsildar, Ardaveedu Mandal Prakasam District.

.....RESPONDENT(S)

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that inthe circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will bepleased to to issue a writ order or a direction more particularly one in thenature of writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings NoRCH/1597/2008 dt. 15-10-2008 of the second respondent as beingillegal, arbitrary and unreasonable and in gross violation of the principlesof natural justice and consequently set aside the same with a furtherdirection directing the respondents to supply the stocks regularly to thepetitioners fair price shop and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.LAKSHMA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES

The Court made the following :

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU

W.P.No.25500 of 2008

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER:

The learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.

Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissedas withdrawn. No order as to costs.

Date: 29.12.2008DA

_____________ C.V.RAMULU, J

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU

29.12.2008

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead