Telangana High Court
CC/706/2013 of V.Varaprasada Raju Vs Sri Syed Ali Murtuza Rizvi, IAS, on 29 December 2022
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND,AND TWENTY TWO . PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 706 OF 2013 Contempl Case under Section 1 0 lo 12 ol Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND,AND TWENTY TWO
.
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 706 OF 2013
Contempl Case under Section 1 0 lo 12 ol Contempt of Courts Act 1971 topunish the respondents herein for violating, disobeying the Orders of the HighCourt dated: 23-7-2012 in W.P.M.P.No. 27 490 of 2012 in W.P.No. 21457 of2012.
Between:
'1. V.Varaprasada Raju, S/o Narasa Raju, Hindu, Aged about 50 years,business, R/ o.D.No.12-1 -61 411O2, HUDA Colony, Chanda nagar,Hyderabad.business, R/ o.D.No.12-1 -61 411O2, HUDA Colony, Chanda nagar,Hyderabad.2. D.Jagan Mohan Reddy, S/o Govinda Reddy, Hindu, Aged about 39 [years_,]business, Rl/o .FIat No. 402, Sailaxmitowers, Annapurna Enclave,Chandanagar, Hyderabad.business, Rl/o .FIat No. 402, Sailaxmitowers, Annapurna Enclave,Chandanagar, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONERS/ PETITIONERS/ WRIT PETITIONERS
AND
1. Sri Syed Ali Murtuza Rizvi, lAS, The District Collector, Hyderabad NampallyStation Road, Hyderabad.Station Road, Hyderabad.
2. M. Ramakrishna, The Tahsildar, Marredpally Mandal, Secunderabad.
3. Sri IM.T. Krishna Babu, lAS, The Commissioner & Special Officer, GreaterHyderabad lr/unicipal Corporatron (GHMC), Tank Bund Rodd, Hyderabad.Hyderabad lr/unicipal Corporatron (GHMC), Tank Bund Rodd, Hyderabad.
4. Sri S. Hari Krishna, The Zonal Commissioner [(NZ), ]Greater HyderabadMunicipal Corporation, Opp. to St.Ann's School, Marredpally, SecunderabadMunicipal Corporation, Opp. to St.Ann's School, Marredpally, Secunderabad
...RESPONDENTSI RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS 2 to 5
Counsel for the Petitione(s):SRl. K DURGA PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTICONTEMPT CASE No.7O6 of 2Ol3
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This contempt case is of the yeat 2O13. When thismatter came up on 22.1.7.2022, it is submitted that learnedcounsel for the petitioner is no more. Thereafter, this Courthas directed the Registry to serve notice on the petitioners. Asfor ttre note put up by the Registry, notice is served on the 2"dpetitioner. As it is being the contempt of the year 2OL3, if anycause of action survives, the petitioners are at liberty to file afresh petition.
2. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed.Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, sha1l stand clo sed.
Sd/- CH. VENKATESWARLUDEPUTY REGISTRAR.-t.I I a,-SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,1. One CC to SRl. K [DURGA ][PRASAD ][Advocate ]tOPUgli. i*" ccr io Gp ron [nEvrruUE, ][High ][court foi ][the ][state ][of Telangana, ][at]Hyderabad [OUT]3. Two CD Copiespr$>
I
HIGH COURTDATED: 2911212022
ORDERGC.No.706 of 2013
DISMISSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
2drlf
1HE [S ][14] ,t:73 (2E,rtN2tr73