Telangana High Court
WA/2137/2004 of Dr. T. Kameswara Rao, Vs Mr. Ch. Surya Prakash, on 30 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 2137 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA,
CHIEF JUSTICE
and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY
WRIT APPEAL NO : 2137 of 2004
(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated14/10/2004 in WP NO : 19012 OF 2004 on the file of the High Court.)
Between:
Dr. T. Kameswara Rao, S/o Late Sri T. Jagannatham,R/o Plot No.15, Sai Ansh Arcade, Durga Vihar Colony,Trimulgheery, Secunderabad.
AND
..... APPELLANT
1 Mr. Ch. Surya Prakash, S/o Sri Ch. Narayana, R/o Plot No. 59, Sanjeevaiah Nagar colony, Tarbund, Secunderabad.
2 The Secunderabad Cantonment Board, Rep. by its the Chief Executive Officer, Secunderabad.
Counsel for the Appellant : MR.A.P.VENUGOPALCounsel for the respondent No.1: None appeared.Counsel for the Respondent No.2: MR.DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE
The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT:
( per Hon’ble The Chief Justice )
…..
1. Writ petition of the appellant was dismissed in which appellant has soughtdirection against the Cantonment Board for stopping unauthorizedconstruction and its removal made by 1[st] respondent.
2. We are informed by learned counsel for respondent No.2 that pursuant tothe complaint filed by the appellant, action has been taken by theCantonment Board and proceedings are initiated against 1[st] respondent. In that view of the matter, we will dispose of the writ petition with direction to 2[nd]respondent to proceed in accordance with law in case respondent No.1 hasviolated any of the provisions of the Act, Rules and Regulations. Orderedaccordingly. No costs.
____________________
DEVINDER GUPTA. C.J.,
______________________
M. NARAYANA REDDY. J.,
Dated: 30.12.2004.
VRK.
To
1 The Chief Executive Officer, Secunderabad Cantonment Board, Secunderabad.Cantonment Board, Secunderabad.
HON’BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA,
CHIEF JUSTICEAND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. NARAYANA REDDY.
W.A.NO. 2137 OF 2004.
( Judgment of the Bench delivered byHon’ble The Chief Justice )
Dt: 30.12.2004.