Telangana High Court
WP/11672/2002 of Penki Gunnam Naidu, Vs Chief Commissioner, on 29 December 2009
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND NINE WRIT PETITION No.11672 of 2002 Between: Penki Gunnam Naidu. … Petitioner And: Chief
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE,ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNAREDDY
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OFDECEMBER,TWO THOUSAND NINE
WRIT PETITION No.11672of 2002
Between:Penki Gunnam Naidu.
…
Petitioner
And:
Chief Commissioner, Land Administration,Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh and three others.
…
Respondents.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Y.Ravindra Kumar.
Counsel for the Respondents: None.
This Court made the following:-ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for a Certiorari to quashproceedings, dated 14-6-2002, issued by respondentNo.1.
At the hearing, Sri Y.Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the impugnedorder was passed pending the revision beforerespondent No.1; and that during the pendency of thisWrit Petition, the revision petition itself was disposed ofby respondent No.1. The learned counsel furthersubmitted that questioning the said order, the aggrievedparty, viz., respondent No.4, filed a Writ Petition, whichis pending in this Court.
Inasmuch as the revision, pending which theimpugned order has been passed, has already beendisposed of by respondent No.1, the cause in this WritPetition does not survive for consideration. The WritPetition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition,WPMP No.4393 of 2002 is also dismissed asinfructuous.
------------------------------------
C.V.NAGARJUNA
REDDY,J
Date:29-12-2009MNR