Telangana High Court
WP/38369/2012 of P.Dhanunjaya Vs The Commissioner on 28 December 2012
SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITIONS No. 38369 AND 38374 OF 2012 COMMON ORDER: Both these Writ Petitions can be disposed of by this common order. Though these Writ Petitions have been instituted challenging the correctness of the orders passed by the Greater Hyderabad
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAOWRIT PETITIONS No. 38369 AND 38374 OF 2012
COMMONORDER:
Both these Writ Petitions can be disposed of by this commonorder.
Though these Writ Petitions have been instituted challengingthe correctness of the orders passed by the Greater HyderabadMunicipal Corporation, in accordance with Sub-section (2) of Section452 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955, but however,the petitioners in both these cases have approached the GreaterHyderabad Municipal Corporation subsequently by institutingapplications in terms of Section 455-A of the said Act.
It is therefore, appropriate to direct the Corporation to take allrelevant factors into account and consideration and pass appropriateorders on such applications within a maximum period of two monthsfrom today. Till the orders are passed on such applications, nodemolitions may take place pursuant to the impugned orders.
With this, both the Writ Petitions stand disposed of. No costs.
Consequently, the miscellaneous applications, if any shallstand disposed of.
------------------------------------------- (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J)
28[th] December 2012
vhb/ksld