Telangana High Court
SA/449/2006 of Pidugu Bangaramma Vs Medarametla Annapurnamma on 31 December 2014
S. RAVI KUMAR SECOND APPEAL No.449 of 2006 JUDGMENT: No representation is made on behalf of appellant though the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”. It seems that appellant is not interested to prosecute this case. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for Non-
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMARSECOND APPEAL No.449 of 2006
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
No representation is made on behalf of appellantthough the matter is listed under the caption “fordismissal”. It seems that appellant is not interested toprosecute this case.
Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for Non-Prosecution. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, inthis Appeal shall stand closed.
Date: 31-12-2014.gvl
__________________
S. RAVI KUMAR, J