Telangana High Court
WP/22550/2020 of M/s.AVR Zinc Products Pvt Ltd., Vs UCO Bank on 31 December 2020
THE STATE OF TELANGANA (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY Between: lV/s. AVR Zinc Products Pvt Ltd, No71-6-21/ A ' A Block .No301iA' Ameer Estate, s n Nagar,""H"y;"irn"o_ 5oo Q3Q Rep by its Authorised
HIGH COURT [FOR ][THE STATE ][OF ][TELANGANA](SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, [THE THIRTY FIRST ][DAY ][OF ][DECEIVBER]TWO THOUSAND [AND ][TWENTY]
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE [SRI ][JUSTICE ][A. RAJASHEKER ][REDDY]AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE [K. LAKSHMAN]
WRIT PETITI[ON No. ][22550][ oF ][2020]
Between:
lV/s. AVR Zinc [Products ][Pvt ][Ltd, ][No71-6-21/A' ][A ][Block ][.No301iA' ][Ameer]Estate, s n [Nagar,""H"y;"irn"o_ ][5oo ]Q3Q [Rep ][by ][its ][Authorised ]^Signatoryili.Eiiptof,Atno"t [Xu.ar ][S/o ][lrr'lr'Veera ][Rajeswara Rao' aged ][6u ][years']
...PETITIONER
AND
dnur.,o"ii,' UCO Bank, [niiohauan ][Asset ][lvlanaoement ]"n%-r;l sbmaiiguda, [Branch, ][No ]Hyderabad- [6-3-1 ][108' Ground ]500 082 [Floor ]Rep. [Navabharat]by itsAuthorised Officer.
...RESPONDENT
Petition under [Article ][226 ][of ][the ][Constitution ][of ][lndia ][praying ][that ][in ][the]circumstancesStatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCoUrtmaybepleasedtoissue an order, [writ ][ot ][ii[liion ][more ][particularly ][one ][in ][the ][nature ][of ][writ ][of]mandamus [declaring ][tne ][proceeOings ][initiated ][by the ][respondent ][bank ][under]Securitisation [and ][Reconstruction ][of ][Financial ][Assets and ][Enforcement ][of ][Security]lnterest Act, [2002 ][including ][sale notice ][dl25l11l2020 ][as null and ][void]
IAN O: 1 OF [2020]
Page 1 of 2
PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatintheCircumstanCesstatedintheafiOavit lireO [in ][support ][of the ][petition, ][tne ][lign ][Colrt ][may ][be ][pleased ][to ][stay ][all]further [proceedings subsequeni ][to ][sale ][notic; ][dt.25/1 ][1i2020 ][including ][e-auotion]io oe hio on [1511bl2o2o' ][pending disposal of ][the ][main ][writ ][petition']p;;;;."i Counsel for the [Petitioner: ][SRI RAVINUTHALA V ][S ][R]
Counsel for the [ResPondents: ]['---']
The Court made [the ][following: ][ORDER]
l
To,
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE [A.RAJASHEKER ][REDDY]ANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI [JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN]
Writ Petition No.22550 of 2020
ORDER:[(Per ]Sri Justi
A. Raiasheker Reddv)
Learned counsel for the [petitioner ]submits [that the cause ][in ][the ][writ]petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ [petition has ][become]infructuous.
Recording the aforesaid submission, [the ][Writ ][Petition is dismissed ][as]infructuous. No order as to costs.
lvliscellaneous [petitions, ]if any, [pending ][in ][this writ ][petition ][shall]stand dismissed.
SD/-V.SUDHAASSISTANT [REGISTRAR].!-v,'SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY'
1. One CC [to Sri. Ravinuthala, V S ][R ][Advocate ][[OPUC]]2. Two C.D. [CoPies]
Prk
^///
I
HIGH COURTDATEDl.311121202O
ORDERWP.No.22550 [of ][2020]
Dismissing the WP.as infructuouswithout costs.
,-..V1a\=- [c-O ][O]r-o2lr>-\o [r])r
ei,.9()'4F.tiix,*'$Ia),/ $\*,l
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…